The Supreme Court has imposed ₹1 lakh costs on Uttar Pradesh for a 30-year delay in cadre reallocation for a government employee who opted for the hill cadre to care for his cognitively disabled son. This landmark judgment clarifies the distinction between a 'transfer' and a 'change in cadre' and highlights state apathy in service disputes.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Fine Imposed: ₹1 lakh
- ›Legal Battle Duration: ~30 years (1997-2026)
- ›Target this Data: Fine amount of ₹1 lakh imposed on Uttar Pradesh.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh.
- ›Target this Legal Point: Distinction between 'transfer' and 'change in cadre' as clarified by the SC.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.