What is the common examiner trap about Intl. Relations in UPSC exams?

Confusing the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) with the Afghan Taliban. While both are Islamist militant groups, the TTP is a distinct entity primarily targeting Pakistan, whereas the Afghan Taliban controls the government in Kabul. Also, mixing up the Doha Agreement with other Afghan peace deals like the Bonn Agreement.

What should UPSC aspirants remember about Intl. Relations for Prelims?

1. Target this Data: 7 militant camps targeted in Nangarhar and Paktika provinces. 2. Target this Nodal Body: The Afghan Taliban's Interim Government (referred to as 'Interim Afghan Government' in Pakistan's statement). 3. Target this Legal Point: The Doha Agreement (2020) obligations regarding denial of territory to terrorist groups.

International RelationsSecurity

Take AI Challenge ▸

News 15 of 20

Pakistan Airstrikes Target TTP, IS Affiliates in Afghanistan; Kabul Vows Retaliation Citing Doha Agreement Violation

Q: The Doha Agreement (2020), mentioned in the context of Pakistan's airstrikes in Afghanistan, was primarily signed between which two parties?

The United States and the Taliban, The Doha Agreement, formally the 'Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan', was signed in February 2020 between the United States and the Taliban to end the Afghan War, leading to the withdrawal of US troops. Pakistan and Afghanistan were not direct signatories.

Q: Consider the following statements regarding the recent Pakistan airstrikes in Afghanistan: 1. The airstrikes targeted camps belonging to the Afghan Taliban government. 2. Pakistan invoked the Doha Agreement to criticize Afghanistan's inaction against militant groups. 3. Afghanistan's Defence Ministry stated the strikes targeted a religious school and several residential homes. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Both 2 and 3, Statement 1 is incorrect. The article states Pakistan targeted camps of the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) and an IS affiliate, not the Afghan Taliban government. Statement 2 is correct as Pakistan's statement mentions the Doha Agreement. Statement 3 is correct as per the Afghan Defence Ministry's post quoted in the article.

Q: According to the news article, how many militant camps did Pakistan claim to target in its airstrikes inside Afghanistan?

7, Pakistan's Information Minister stated that 'intelligence-based, selective operations' were conducted against seven camps belonging to the Pakistani Taliban (TTP) and its affiliates. The other numbers are close distractors not mentioned in the article.

Q: What is the primary reason cited by Pakistan for conducting airstrikes inside Afghan territory, as per the article?

To target militant groups it says operate from Afghan soil and attack Pakistan, Pakistan stated it targeted camps of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and an IS affiliate, which it holds responsible for attacks inside Pakistan. It accused the Afghan Taliban regime of failing to take action against these groups, justifying the cross-border strikes as self-defence.

Intl. Relations Security & DefenceHIGH

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GAPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link

22 Feb 2026

~2 min

Source: Indian Express

Key Data:7 camps targetedNangarhar provincePaktika provinceDoha Agreement (2020)

Bodies:Pakistan ArmyAfghan Defence MinistryInterim Afghan Government

Practice MCQs from today's news ▸

~2 min · Quick mode

What This Article Covers

1.Pakistan launched intelligence-based airstrikes in Afghanistan's Nangarhar and Paktika provinces, targeting seven camps of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and an Islamic State affiliate.

2.Afghanistan condemned the strikes as a violation of international law and the Doha Agreement, citing civilian casualties and vowing a 'calculated response'.

3.Pakistan criticized the Afghan Taliban regime for failing to act against terrorists on its soil, invoking the Doha Agreement's clauses on denying territory to groups threatening neighbours.

The Big Picture

Prelims · MediumMains · High

Pakistan conducted airstrikes inside Afghanistan targeting militant groups, leading to civilian casualties and a vow of retaliation from the Afghan Taliban government. This escalation tests the Doha Agreement's framework for regional stability and highlights the persistent security challenge of cross-border militant sanctuaries.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Strike DateFebruary 21-22, 2026 (Saturday night)

Targeted ProvincesNangarhar and Paktika (Afghanistan)

Targeted GroupsTehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and an Islamic State (IS) affiliate

Number of Camps Targeted7

Key Agreement ReferencedDoha Agreement (2020)

1-Minute Revision

›Strike Date: February 21-22, 2026 (Saturday night)
›Targeted Provinces: Nangarhar and Paktika (Afghanistan)
›Target this Data: 7 militant camps targeted in Nangarhar and Paktika provinces.
›Target this Nodal Body: The Afghan Taliban's Interim Government (referred to as 'Interim Afghan Government' in Pakistan's statement).
›Target this Legal Point: The Doha Agreement (2020) obligations regarding denial of territory to terrorist groups.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

News Snapshot

💥

Cross-Border Strikes

Pakistan conducted airstrikes inside Afghanistan, targeting seven militant camps of the TTP and an IS affiliate.

⚖️

International Law Violation

Afghanistan condemned the action as a violation of international law and the Doha Agreement, citing civilian casualties.

🤝

Doha Agreement Obligations

Pakistan invoked the Doha Agreement, accusing Afghanistan of failing its obligation to deny its soil to groups threatening Pakistan.

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

The Doha Agreement (2020) between the US and the Taliban included commitments from the Taliban to prevent Afghan soil from being used for attacks against other countries. Post-US withdrawal, Pakistan has repeatedly accused the Afghan Taliban of harbouring the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which has launched attacks inside Pakistan. This incident is a significant escalation of these tensions, moving from diplomatic pressure to direct military action across the Durand Line.

Core Analysis & Implications

Pakistan's decision to conduct unilateral strikes signifies a loss of confidence in the Afghan Taliban's willingness or ability to control militant groups. This undermines the core premise of the Doha Agreement's security guarantees. The Afghan vow of retaliation risks a bilateral military conflict, destabilizing the region further. It also complicates India's and China's regional security calculus and challenges the international community's engagement with the Taliban regime.

Future Outlook / Way Forward

The immediate risk is a cycle of tit-for-tat strikes, escalating into a low-intensity conflict. The international community, particularly the US and China (both with stakes in regional stability), will likely intensify diplomatic efforts to de-escalate. Future developments hinge on whether the Taliban regime can demonstrate substantive action against TTP sanctuaries to satisfy Pakistan's security concerns, a key test for the regime's internal cohesion and external relations.

Key Facts at a Glance

Strike DateFebruary 21-22, 2026 (Saturday night)

Targeted ProvincesNangarhar and Paktika (Afghanistan)

Targeted GroupsTehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and an Islamic State (IS) affiliate

Number of Camps Targeted7

Key Agreement ReferencedDoha Agreement (2020)

You've read the full analysis. Now test your understanding.

Practice exam-style questions based on this article.

Q1Static LinkageEasyUPSC, SSC

The Doha Agreement (2020), mentioned in the context of Pakistan's airstrikes in Afghanistan, was primarily signed between which two parties?

Q2Statement-basedHardUPSC

Consider the following statements regarding the recent Pakistan airstrikes in Afghanistan:

1. The airstrikes targeted camps belonging to the Afghan Taliban government.

2. Pakistan invoked the Doha Agreement to criticize Afghanistan's inaction against militant groups.

3. Afghanistan's Defence Ministry stated the strikes targeted a religious school and several residential homes.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMediumUPSC, SSC, Banking

According to the news article, how many militant camps did Pakistan claim to target in its airstrikes inside Afghanistan?

Q4Application/ImpactMediumUPSC, SSC

What is the primary reason cited by Pakistan for conducting airstrikes inside Afghan territory, as per the article?

All 15 MCQs ▸

Read original article from Indian Express

You finished this topic

Practice 3 MCQs from this news Next Article

Explore Related Topics

Intl. RelationsView Topic MCQs →Security & DefenceView Topic MCQs →

PreviousPM Modi Inaugurates 82 km Delhi-Meerut Namo Bharat RRTS & Meerut Metro, India's First Integrated Regional Rapid Transit System Next DGS Proposes Stricter Penalties Under Indian Telecom Act 2023 For Illegal Satellite Phone Use In Indian Waters

Related Current Affairs

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Pakistan's Defence Forces Act 2026 Creates CDF, Giving Army Chief Command Over All Three Services

Pakistan's Parliament has passed the Defence Forces of Pakistan Act, 2026, creating the post of Chief of Defence Forces (CDF) with statutory operational command over the army, navy and air force — a first in the country's history. Field Marshal Asim Munir will hold the post while remaining army chief, making this the most significant restructuring of Pakistan's military command since 1976 and a key development for regional security and civil-military balance.

Security & Defence Current Affairs

Pakistan Airstrikes on 10 Afghan Locations, Border Clash Kill Several Taliban Fighters

Pakistan conducted precision airstrikes on 10 locations in Afghanistan on September 24, 2026, killing 4 civilians per Taliban. The next day, Afghan Taliban fighters attempted to enter Pakistan in Balochistan's Gulistan sector, leading to a border clash with several fatalities. This follows drone incursions from Afghanistan on September 23 where Pakistan shot down 8 drones. The escalation is part of Pakistan's counter-terrorism campaign 'Ghazab lil Haq' targeting TTP hideouts.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Turkey Sign NATO-Style Collective Defence Pact

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey signed the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, a NATO-style collective defence pact. However, the alliance lacks a common threat due to divergent relationships with Iran and Israel, making it more a hedge against regional uncertainty than a true military alliance. India should monitor but not overreact.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Mecca Agreement (Aug 7, 2026): Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey Sign Mutual Defence Pact for Regional Security

The Mecca Agreement creates a mutual defence pact among Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey. While its deterrence is questionable due to non-public nature and historical record, it signals a strategic alignment against Israel and Iran, with China as a background collaborator. This is crucial for understanding evolving power dynamics in the Islamic world and implications for India's security.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkiye Sign Mecca Joint Defence Agreement; References UN Charter Article 51

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkiye have signed the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, a collective defence pact stated as purely defensive and open to other nations. The agreement references UN Charter Article 51 and is not directed against any country, though it comes amid heightened US-Iran tensions. For Indian exams, this is a key development in West Asian geopolitics and regional security architecture.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Türkiye Sign Mecca Joint Defence Agreement on 7 August 2026

A trilateral defence pact named after Mecca turns a hard-power military deal into a symbol of pan-Islamic solidarity. For exams, it illustrates how treaty titles are strategic frames that shape public perception and provide diplomatic cover for domestic politics.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkiye Sign Makkah Joint Defence Agreement with Mutual Defence Clause Amid West Asia Crisis

Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkiye signed the 'Makkah Joint Defence Agreement' on August 7, 2026, in Mecca, with a mutual defence clause that an armed attack on one is an attack on all. This trilateral pact, driven by escalating West Asia tensions (Houthi attacks, Red Sea security, Israel-Turkiye tensions), strengthens collective deterrence and has major implications for regional security architecture, including India's strategic calculus.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Makkah Joint Defence Agreement Signed on Aug 7, 2026: Saudi-Türkiye-Pakistan Pact Impacts India

The Makkah Joint Defence Agreement (MJDA) signed by Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Pakistan on August 7, 2026, creates a new security triangle in West Asia, echoing NATO's Article 5. While it may raise concerns for India due to Pakistan's involvement, Riyadh's ties with New Delhi are strong and unlikely to be undermined by this pact. India should monitor developments but not overreact.

Start Today's Quiz(15 Qs)

Take Today's Quiz

15 Qs • 5-7 Mins

Pakistan Airstrikes Target TTP, IS Affiliates in Afghanistan; Kabul Vows Retaliation Citing Doha Agreement Violation

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

1-Minute Revision

News Snapshot

Cross-Border Strikes

International Law Violation

Doha Agreement Obligations

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

Core Analysis & Implications

Future Outlook / Way Forward

Prelims Flashpoints

Key Facts at a Glance