PolityGovernance
News 4 of 20

Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam, 2026: Maharashtra Proposes 7-Year Rigorous Imprisonment, Rs 5 Lakh Fine for Unlawful Conversion

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
07 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:7 years rigorous imprisonmentRs 5 lakh fine9 states since 2017Up to 20 years imprisonment (Rajasthan)30/60/90 day notice periods
Bodies:Supreme CourtGujarat High CourtMadhya Pradesh High CourtKarnataka High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Maharashtra Cabinet cleared the Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam, 2026, proposing up to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and a Rs 5 lakh fine for unlawful religious conversion.

2.Nine states have passed similar laws since 2017, mandating bureaucratic permissions for conversion and reversing the burden of proof, with judicial pushback on privacy and harassment concerns.

3.Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of these laws are pending before the Supreme Court, which has transferred all related High Court petitions to itself for a consolidated hearing.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

Maharashtra is the latest state to propose a stringent anti-conversion law, joining nine others that have enacted similar statutes since 2017. These laws share a common legal template, reversing the burden of proof and mandating state permission for religious conversion, which has faced judicial scrutiny for potential rights violations. This is a critical issue for exams on fundamental rights, judicial review, and state governance.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Maharashtra BillDharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam, 2026
Maximum Punishment7 years rigorous imprisonment, Rs 5 lakh fine (Maharashtra)
States with Laws9 states since 2017
Highest PunishmentUp to 20 years rigorous imprisonment (Rajasthan)
Supreme Court StatusPetitions pending since 2020, consolidated in Sep 2025

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Maharashtra Bill: Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam, 2026
  • ›Maximum Punishment: 7 years rigorous imprisonment, Rs 5 lakh fine (Maharashtra)
  • ›Target this Data: Maximum punishment under Maharashtra's 2026 Bill is 7 years rigorous imprisonment and Rs 5 lakh fine.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: District Magistrate (DM) is the key authority for receiving prior declarations for conversion.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: These laws reverse the general principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' by placing the burden of proof on the accused.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article guarantees the freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice, and propagate religion, forming the basis for challenges against anti-conversion laws?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding anti-conversion laws in India:

1. The Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh laws require individuals to submit a declaration to the District Magistrate at least 30 days before conversion.

2. The Rajasthan law prescribes the highest punishment among these states, with rigorous imprisonment of up to 20 years for unlawful conversion involving minors or SC/ST communities.

3. The Gujarat High Court upheld all sections of its state's anti-conversion law, including those assuming conversions for marriage are fraudulent.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the news, what is the maximum rigorous imprisonment and fine proposed under the Maharashtra Cabinet-cleared Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam, 2026?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

A key common feature of the anti-conversion laws passed by various states, as highlighted in the news, is that they reverse a fundamental principle of criminal justice. What is this principle?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

President Murmu Assents Maharashtra Anti-Conversion Law: 60-Day Notice, 7-Year Jail for Violations

Maharashtra's anti-conversion law receives President's assent, becoming the latest state to regulate religious conversions. The law mandates a 60-day prior notice to the district magistrate, places the burden of proof on the converter, and prescribes up to 7 years imprisonment (10 years for repeat offenders). This is crucial for understanding state legislative powers, fundamental rights (Article 25), and the ongoing debate on religious freedom versus regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Govt to SC: Only Parliament Can Extend Creamy Layer to SC/ST; Cites Article 341, E V Chinnaiah Case

The government has told the Supreme Court that extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST is a policy decision for Parliament alone. This reaffirms that reservation for SC/ST is based on historical social criteria, not just economic status, and the creamy layer concept currently applies only to OBCs.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Releases New Gender Sensitivity Handbook, Replaces 2023 Version; Recommends Survivor-Centric Language & Trauma-Informed Court Practices

The Supreme Court has released a new report titled 'Judgments and Gender' replacing its 2023 handbook on combating gender stereotypes. The report, drafted by an expert committee headed by former SC judge Justice Aniruddha Bose, provides practical guidelines for judges to use survivor-centric language, avoid morality-laden expressions, and adopt trauma-informed courtroom practices. This is crucial for UPSC as it reflects judicial reforms in gender sensitivity and victim protection.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Dismisses Plea to Abolish Hanging; PM CARES Fund Donations Jump 592% to ₹480 Crore in 2024-25

Today's news highlights key developments for exam aspirants: the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of execution by hanging but left the door open for a government review; the PM CARES Fund disclosed a massive 592% jump in donations to ₹480 crore but spent only 0.1% of it; and the SC sought a government response on a standardized probe for paper leak cases. These stories cover constitutional law, transparency in public charities, and governance reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC Directs TN Chief Secretary to Form Panel on POCSO, Juvenile Justice Gaps

The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to form a committee of Home, Health, and Law Secretaries to address systemic gaps in implementing the POCSO and Juvenile Justice Acts. The court made key suggestions including gender-neutral application of POCSO, avoiding criminalizing consensual adolescent relationships, and establishing protocols for medical termination of pregnancy and child witness deposition rooms. This is crucial for UPSC aspirants as it touches upon child rights, judicial activism, and state governance.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs Centre on NTA Reform: Radhakrishnan & Nilekani Committee Recommendations

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to file an affidavit on implementing recommendations of the K Radhakrishnan and Nandan Nilekani committees to reform the NTA, aiming to make it a vibrant, foolproof institution like the UPSC. The court stressed institutionalisation with proper infrastructure, manpower, and technology to prevent exam leaks and ensure integrity.

Explained: How anti-conversion…, Current Affairs for Exams