The Supreme Court has put mining activities in the ecologically sensitive Aravalli region on hold, refusing relief to lease holders. It is forming an expert panel to resolve critical ambiguities in the definition of the Aravallis, specifically concerning the 100-metre elevation and 500-metre gap criteria, which could strip large areas of protection. This is a crucial case for environmental jurisprudence and sustainable development.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Bench: CJI Surya Kant & Justice Joymalya Bagchi
- ›Case Title: "In Re: Definition of Aravalli hills and ranges and ancillary issue"
- ›Target this Data: 100 metres elevation & 500 metres gap (Definition criteria)
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC)
- ›Target this Legal Point: Suo Motu jurisdiction of Supreme Court (Article 142)
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.