PolityGovernance
News 23 of 26

Juvenile Justice Act 2021 Amendment: District Collectors to Issue Adoption Orders to Reduce Delays, Bombay HC Upholds

Target:MPSCUPSC GS-IITeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
07 May 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:2021 AmendmentMay 4, 2026 HC ruling
Bodies:Bombay High CourtCentral Adoption Resource Authority (CARA)
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Bombay High Court dismissed petitions challenging the 2021 amendment to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act.

2.The amendment replaces courts with District Collectors for issuing adoption orders to reduce delays in the adoption process.

3.The Court ruled District Collectors are competent as senior Executive Magistrates, and training will be provided for this function.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Bombay High Court has upheld a 2021 amendment to the Juvenile Justice Act that transfers the power to issue adoption orders from courts to District Collectors. This shift aims to expedite the adoption process by reducing judicial delays, a key administrative reform in child protection governance.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Amendment Year2021
Court BenchJustice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande
Date of HC RulingMay 4, 2026
Authority Replacing CourtDistrict Collector (Executive Officer)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Amendment Year: 2021
  • ›Court Bench: Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande
  • ›Target this Data: 2021 (Year of the Juvenile Justice Act Amendment)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Substitution of 'Court' with 'District Collector' in the JJ Act

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which ministry does the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) function?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Bombay High Court ruling:

1. It upheld a 2022 amendment to the Juvenile Justice Act.

2. It ruled that District Collectors are competent to conduct hearings in adoption proceedings.

3. The primary objective of the amendment was to reduce delays in the adoption process.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

In which year was the amendment to the Juvenile Justice Act, which transferred adoption order powers to District Collectors, passed?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary rationale defended by the Central Government for amending the Juvenile Justice Act to involve District Collectors in adoption orders?

All 20 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Bombay HC Orders Reimbursement to 4 NEET Toppers Denied Govt Seats Due to EWS, Maratha Quotas

The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to reimburse fees of four medical students who were denied government college seats despite higher NEET scores, due to the application of EWS and Maratha quotas. The court criticized the 'non-transparent' implementation of the state's reimbursement scheme and upheld the primacy of merit. This judgment is significant for understanding the judicial scrutiny of reservation policies and the principle of merit in public admissions.

Polity Current Affairs

Bombay HC Rules Community Health Volunteers Entitled to Minimum Wage Under 1948 Act

The Bombay High Court has ruled that community health volunteers working for the BMC are entitled to minimum wages under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, rejecting the argument that their honorarium exempts them. This judgment strengthens labour rights for contractual and volunteer workers, an important topic for UPSC labour jurisprudence and social security.

Polity Current Affairs

Bombay HC Directs Maharashtra to Regularise Over 450 Contractual Medical Staff, Flags Ad-Hocism in Public Employment

The Bombay High Court has directed Maharashtra to end long-term contractual hiring, specifically ordering the Vasai Virar Municipal Corporation to regularise over 450 medical officers and paramedical staff who served 8–11 years on contract. The Court flagged 'ad-hocism' in public employment and linked it to the state's unemployment crisis, making this a landmark ruling for contractual workers' rights in government services.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Forms HPEC to Probe NEET-UG Protest Violence; Collectors in 8 States/UTs Empowered for CAA Citizenship

A day of major structural developments: The Supreme Court constituted a high-powered committee (HPEC) to investigate police violence during NEET-UG protests, while the MHA empowered District Collectors in 8 States/UTs to process CAA citizenship applications, bypassing earlier multi-agency committees. Additionally, a 9-judge SC bench overruled the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply judgment on 'industry' definition under the new labour codes, fundamentally altering worker rights.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Collegium Elevation Threatens Maratha Quota Case; 10% SEBC Reservation at Risk

The Supreme Court Collegium’s recommendation to transfer Bombay HC Acting Chief Justice Ravindra V Ghuge to Calcutta HC may force a fresh hearing of the challenge to Maharashtra’s 2024 Maratha reservation law after 20 sittings. This is the second time a bench change has stalled the politically sensitive case, putting the 10% SEBC quota for the Maratha community in legal limbo.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Dismisses Plea to Abolish Hanging; PM CARES Fund Donations Jump 592% to ₹480 Crore in 2024-25

Today's news highlights key developments for exam aspirants: the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of execution by hanging but left the door open for a government review; the PM CARES Fund disclosed a massive 592% jump in donations to ₹480 crore but spent only 0.1% of it; and the SC sought a government response on a standardized probe for paper leak cases. These stories cover constitutional law, transparency in public charities, and governance reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC Directs TN Chief Secretary to Form Panel on POCSO, Juvenile Justice Gaps

The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to form a committee of Home, Health, and Law Secretaries to address systemic gaps in implementing the POCSO and Juvenile Justice Acts. The court made key suggestions including gender-neutral application of POCSO, avoiding criminalizing consensual adolescent relationships, and establishing protocols for medical termination of pregnancy and child witness deposition rooms. This is crucial for UPSC aspirants as it touches upon child rights, judicial activism, and state governance.