PolityGovernance
News 8 of 30

Bombay HC Quashes Railways' Rejection of 75% Blind Candidate, Invokes RPwD Act 2016 'Reasonable Accommodation' Doctrine

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
02 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:75% blindnessRPwD Act 2016Article 14Article 21Group D Level 1 post
Bodies:Bombay High CourtIndian RailwaysCentral Administrative Tribunal (CAT)
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Bombay HC quashed Indian Railways' rejection of Asha Shinde, a 75% blind candidate for a Group D post, citing violation of the 'reasonable accommodation' principle under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

2.The Court held that 'reasonable accommodation' is a statutory mandate, not a discretionary concession, and must be applied before declaring a PwD candidate ineligible, thereby upholding substantive equality.

3.The judgment rejected the preliminary objection regarding jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal, stating the petition was for enforcement of fundamental rights under Articles 14 & 21 and statutory rights under RPwD Act.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Bombay High Court's landmark judgment reinforces disability rights in public employment. It mandates that eligibility for Persons with Disabilities (PwDs) must be assessed through 'reasonable accommodation' under the RPwD Act, 2016, setting a precedent against indirect discrimination in recruitment.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bench of JusticesR I Chagla & Advait M Sethna
Disability Percentage75% permanent blindness
Post Applied ForGroup D Level 1
Key Act InvokedRights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016
Judgment DateFebruary 27, 2026

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bench of Justices: R I Chagla & Advait M Sethna
  • ›Disability Percentage: 75% permanent blindness
  • ›Target this Data: 75% permanent blindness (benchmark disability)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Bombay High Court (Bench of Justices R I Chagla & Advait M Sethna)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016 and its 'reasonable accommodation' doctrine

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageMedium

Under which Constitutional Article was the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), whose jurisdiction was discussed in the Bombay HC judgment, established?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Bombay High Court judgment on disability rights:

1. The court invoked the doctrine of 'reasonable accommodation' as enshrined in the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

2. The court upheld the Railways' preliminary objection that the matter should be heard by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).

3. The judgment relied on the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of L Chandra Kumar v. Union of India.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

What was the percentage of permanent blindness of the candidate, Asha Shinde, in the Bombay High Court case?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary legal significance of the Bombay High Court's invocation of the 'reasonable accommodation' doctrine in this case?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Bombay HC Rules Community Health Volunteers Entitled to Minimum Wage Under 1948 Act

The Bombay High Court has ruled that community health volunteers working for the BMC are entitled to minimum wages under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, rejecting the argument that their honorarium exempts them. This judgment strengthens labour rights for contractual and volunteer workers, an important topic for UPSC labour jurisprudence and social security.

Polity Current Affairs

Bombay HC Orders Reimbursement to 4 NEET Toppers Denied Govt Seats Due to EWS, Maratha Quotas

The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to reimburse fees of four medical students who were denied government college seats despite higher NEET scores, due to the application of EWS and Maratha quotas. The court criticized the 'non-transparent' implementation of the state's reimbursement scheme and upheld the primacy of merit. This judgment is significant for understanding the judicial scrutiny of reservation policies and the principle of merit in public admissions.

Polity Current Affairs

Bombay HC Directs Maharashtra to Regularise Over 450 Contractual Medical Staff, Flags Ad-Hocism in Public Employment

The Bombay High Court has directed Maharashtra to end long-term contractual hiring, specifically ordering the Vasai Virar Municipal Corporation to regularise over 450 medical officers and paramedical staff who served 8–11 years on contract. The Court flagged 'ad-hocism' in public employment and linked it to the state's unemployment crisis, making this a landmark ruling for contractual workers' rights in government services.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Collegium Elevation Threatens Maratha Quota Case; 10% SEBC Reservation at Risk

The Supreme Court Collegium’s recommendation to transfer Bombay HC Acting Chief Justice Ravindra V Ghuge to Calcutta HC may force a fresh hearing of the challenge to Maharashtra’s 2024 Maratha reservation law after 20 sittings. This is the second time a bench change has stalled the politically sensitive case, putting the 10% SEBC quota for the Maratha community in legal limbo.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Dismisses Plea to Abolish Hanging; PM CARES Fund Donations Jump 592% to ₹480 Crore in 2024-25

Today's news highlights key developments for exam aspirants: the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of execution by hanging but left the door open for a government review; the PM CARES Fund disclosed a massive 592% jump in donations to ₹480 crore but spent only 0.1% of it; and the SC sought a government response on a standardized probe for paper leak cases. These stories cover constitutional law, transparency in public charities, and governance reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

8.23 Lakh Central Govt Posts Vacant, Defence Ministry Tops with 2.41 Lakh Vacancies

Over 8.23 lakh posts (21% of sanctioned strength) are vacant across 80 central ministries/departments as per RTI data. Defence Ministry civilian positions, Indian Railways, and Ministry of Home Affairs account for the highest vacancies. This data highlights the paradox of rising unemployment alongside unfilled government jobs, a key issue for governance and employment essays.

Polity Current Affairs

Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Act 2026: 60-Day Notice, 7-Year Prison Term for Forced Conversion

Maharashtra's new anti-conversion law (2026) takes effect on August 28, requiring a 60-day advance notice to the District Magistrate for conversion and imposing up to 7 years' imprisonment for first-time forced conversion offenses. The law has sparked concerns among minority communities about its potential misuse against interfaith relationships and routine religious practice.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.