PolityGovernance
News 19 of 22

Allahabad HC Rules CCTV Footage Exempt Under RTI Section 8(1)(g), Cannot Be Provided Directly

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
03 Sept 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Section 8(1)(g) of RTI Act, 2005September 1, 2026
Bodies:Allahabad High CourtUttar Pradesh State Information Commission
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Allahabad HC held that CCTV footage is exempt from direct disclosure under RTI Section 8(1)(g).

2.The court clarified that a competent forum can direct preservation and production of footage if a complaint is filed.

3.The ruling underscores the balance between transparency and exemption of sensitive information under RTI.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that CCTV footage cannot be directly provided to an applicant under the RTI Act as it is exempt under Section 8(1)(g). However, a court or commission can direct preservation and production of such footage after a complaint is filed. This clarifies the scope of RTI exemptions and the procedure for accessing sensitive information.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Exemption Section8(1)(g) of RTI Act, 2005
CourtAllahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench)
Date of OrderSeptember 1, 2026

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Exemption Section: 8(1)(g) of RTI Act, 2005
  • ›Court: Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench)
  • ›Target this Data: Section 8(1)(g) of RTI Act, 2005
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: CCTV footage is exempt from direct disclosure under RTI but can be accessed by court/commission after complaint.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which section of the RTI Act, 2005 was cited by the Allahabad High Court to exempt CCTV footage from direct disclosure?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Allahabad High Court ruling on CCTV footage under RTI:

1. The court held that CCTV footage cannot be provided directly to an applicant under RTI.

2. The court allowed direct supply of CCTV footage if a complaint is filed before a court or commission.

3. The petitioner had not filed any complaint before any court or commission.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What is the date of the order passed by the Allahabad High Court in this case?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary implication of the Allahabad High Court ruling on CCTV footage under RTI?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC: Public Employment is Public Trust; Unlawful Appointments Under Articles 14 & 16 Cannot Be Protected

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that public employment is a public trust, and appointments secured through deceit, misrepresentation, or abuse of judicial process cannot be protected. The court upheld the termination of a teacher whose appointment was found unlawful, and ordered recovery of salary and benefits received under interim court protection, reinforcing the constitutional mandate of equality under Articles 14 and 16.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Quashes NSA Detention for Procedural Lapses under BNSS Section 126, Awards ₹5,000 Compensation

The Allahabad High Court quashed the NSA detention of Aakriti Chaudhary, a DU graduate, holding that the state concocted the story and violated procedural safeguards under BNSS Section 126. This reinforces judicial scrutiny of preventive detention laws and the importance of habeas corpus petitions.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad High Court: Govt Cannot Force Sale Deeds for Land Acquisition; Must Use LARR Act 2013

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the government cannot force private landowners to sell their land through sale deeds if they are unwilling. If consent is not obtained, the government must follow the compulsory acquisition process under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. This distinction between voluntary sale and compulsory acquisition is crucial for land rights and government infrastructure projects.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Upholds Mandatory Govt Service Bond for Subsidised PG Medical Education

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that doctors who pursue subsidised PG medical education cannot evade the mandatory two-year government service bond, even if there is administrative delay in providing posting. The court held that the bond ensures availability of doctors in government hospitals and protects patients' right to life under Article 21.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Quashes Class-B History Sheet, Holds Rubber-Stamped Approval Violates Articles 19, 21

The Allahabad High Court quashed a Class-B history sheet against a man, ruling that police surveillance without sufficient evidence of professional criminality violates fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21. This judgment reinforces procedural safeguards in police regulations and is crucial for mains answers on fundamental rights, police powers, and judicial review.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC: Wearing Headscarf Not Essential Religious Practice; Reiterates Judicial Doctrine

The Allahabad High Court has reaffirmed the 'essential religious practices' test, ruling that wearing a headscarf is not essential to Islam. This judgment clarifies the scope of religious freedom in educational institutions and is crucial for understanding the judiciary's role in defining religious practices.

Polity Current Affairs

AFT Reinstates Agniveer: Minor's Non-Disclosure of FIR Not Grounds for Discharge Under Army Rules

The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) has set aside the discharge of an Agniveer who failed to disclose a pending criminal case from his minor years. The ruling reinforces that minors are protected under the Juvenile Justice Act and interim High Court orders, making such non-disclosure legally valid. This is critical for Agniveer recruitment rules and the legal rights of minors in government service.