The Centre has opposed extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST reservations, arguing that historical discrimination based on untouchability cannot be equated with economic backwardness. The affidavit also asserts that any change in reservation policy is Parliament's domain, not the courts. This is critical for understanding the distinction between SC/ST and OBC reservation criteria.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Key Judgment: Indra Sawhney (1992) – creamy layer for OBCs only
- ›Constitutional Articles: Articles 341, 342 (SC/ST lists)
- ›Target this Data: The 1992 Indra Sawhney judgment introduced creamy layer for OBCs only.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court, Parliament (for policy changes).
- ›Target this Legal Point: Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.