PolityGovernance
News 2 of 23

Maharashtra RTI (Amendment) Rules 2026 Challenged: Activists Cite Triple Fees, 150-Word Limit & No Anonymity

Target:MPSCUPSC GS-IITeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
24 Jun 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:June 24, 2026150 wordsTripling of feesRTI Act, 2005
Bodies:Maharashtra GovernmentCentral Information CommissionState Information Commission
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Legal notice sent to Maharashtra govt by Shailesh Gandhi, Prahlad Kachare, Vijay Kumbhar, Vinita Deshmukh, Vivek Velankar, Jugal Rathi, Mohammed Afzal seeking rollback of RTI Amendment Rules 2026.

2.Key amendments challenged: tripling of fees, 150-word limit per query, mandatory identity disclosure, dismissal on non-appearance, and automatic abatement of case on applicant's death.

3.Activists argue the rules exceed delegated authority, lack public consultation, and collectively make access to information more expensive, technical, and burdensome, violating the RTI Act's citizen-centric framework.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

Prominent activists including former Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi have legally challenged the Maharashtra RTI (Amendment) Rules, 2026 for diluting the citizen-centric RTI Act. The rules triple fees, cap queries to 150 words per subject, mandate identity disclosure (removing whistleblower anonymity), and allow dismissal of appeals if the applicant fails to appear or dies. This is a crucial test of delegated legislation versus fundamental right to information.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Date of Legal NoticeJune 24, 2026
Key PetitionerFormer Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi
Core ActRight to Information Act, 2005
New Fee StructureTripling of application fees; new fees for appeals
Query Limit150 words per single subject
Anonymity ShieldRemoved - mandatory identity disclosure
BPL Fee ExemptionCapped / restricted

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Date of Legal Notice: June 24, 2026
  • ›Key Petitioner: Former Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi
  • ›Target this Data: Legal notice date - June 24, 2026; Key provisions - triple fees, 150-word limit, mandatory identity, dismissal on non-appearance, abatement on death.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Maharashtra Government (State Government) vs Central RTI Act, 2005.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Delegated legislation under RTI Act - scope and limits; challenge to rules violating parent Act.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which Act is the parent legislation under which the Maharashtra RTI (Amendment) Rules, 2026 have been framed?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Maharashtra RTI (Amendment) Rules, 2026:

1. The rules triple the application fees and introduce new fees for appeals.

2. The rules mandate that each RTI query must be limited to 150 words and pertain to a single subject.

3. The rules provide enhanced anonymity protection for whistleblowers by not requiring identity disclosure.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the news, what is the word limit imposed per RTI query under the Maharashtra RTI (Amendment) Rules, 2026?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary concern raised by activists regarding the provision for automatic abatement of an RTI case upon the death of the applicant?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Maharashtra Panel Recommends BNS Amendment for Defamatory Social Media Posts; Shreya Singhal Precedent

A Maharashtra government panel has recommended amending the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to specifically criminalize defamatory social media posts, reviving the spirit of the now-struck-down Section 66A of the IT Act. This raises critical constitutional questions about balancing free speech (Article 19(1)(a)) with the right to reputation (Article 21), especially after the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A in Shreya Singhal vs Union of India (2015) for vagueness and overbreadth. For exam aspirants, understanding the legal framework of defamation, the concept of reasonable restrictions, and the proportionality standard is crucial.

Polity Current Affairs

Bombay HC Orders Reimbursement to 4 NEET Toppers Denied Govt Seats Due to EWS, Maratha Quotas

The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to reimburse fees of four medical students who were denied government college seats despite higher NEET scores, due to the application of EWS and Maratha quotas. The court criticized the 'non-transparent' implementation of the state's reimbursement scheme and upheld the primacy of merit. This judgment is significant for understanding the judicial scrutiny of reservation policies and the principle of merit in public admissions.

Polity Current Affairs

Chhattisgarh HC Rules Shariyat Court Cannot Legally Dissolve Marriage; Triple Talaq Order Set Aside

Chhattisgarh High Court held that a Shariyat Court's declaration of triple talaq (Talaq-e-Hasan) has no legal authority. The judgment reinforces the supremacy of constitutional law over religious decrees, a crucial topic for UPSC mains on secularism and Uniform Civil Code.

Polity Current Affairs

Chhattisgarh HC Rules Religious Institutions Cannot Function as Courts; Quashes Shariya Court Triple Talaq Order

The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that no religious institution can assume the authority of a court established by law, striking down a Shariya court's triple talaq order. This reinforces the constitutional supremacy of the legal system over personal religious practices, a critical issue for UPSC Polity and Social Justice.

Polity Current Affairs

SC 9-Judge Bench Rules BWSSB Triple Test Not Binding for IRC 2020 Section 2(p)

The Supreme Court's 9-judge bench has held that the landmark 1978 'Triple Test' for defining 'industry' under the ID Act will not be a binding precedent for interpreting the identical provision in the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This could weaken worker protections just as more workers move to the private sector post-liberalisation.

Polity Current Affairs

President Murmu Assents Maharashtra Anti-Conversion Law: 60-Day Notice, 7-Year Jail for Violations

Maharashtra's anti-conversion law receives President's assent, becoming the latest state to regulate religious conversions. The law mandates a 60-day prior notice to the district magistrate, places the burden of proof on the converter, and prescribes up to 7 years imprisonment (10 years for repeat offenders). This is crucial for understanding state legislative powers, fundamental rights (Article 25), and the ongoing debate on religious freedom versus regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: Govt to Drop Retrospective Clause, Likely Introduced August 12

The Centre has assured to drop the retrospective clause from the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, after concerns from Christian organisations. Mizoram CM Lalduhoma met Home Minister Amit Shah, who confirmed the clause will be removed, and the Bill is likely to be taken up in Lok Sabha on August 12.

Prominent civil rights activists…, Current Affairs for Exams