PolityGovernance
News 2 of 24

Supreme Court Uses Article 142 to Quash CJP Protest FIRs; 2,873 Individuals Excluded

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
03 Sept 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Article 1422,873 individuals excludedSection 528 BNSS1,579 references (1950-2023)791 direct invocationsBhopal gas: $470 million
Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaCockroach Janta Party (CJP)Central Government
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.SC used Article 142 to quash FIRs linked to CJP's nationwide exam protests, giving legal force to government's assurance.

2.2,873 individuals with 'serious and grave criminal antecedents' were excluded from the relief.

3.Article 142 allows SC to pass orders for 'complete justice' but its undefined scope has drawn criticism as a 'nuclear missile' against democratic institutions.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to quash thousands of FIRs filed during CJP protests, except for 2,873 individuals with serious criminal antecedents. This controversial use of 'complete justice' powers bypasses the statutory quashing procedure under BNSS, reigniting debate on judicial overreach. For aspirants, this is a critical case study on Article 142's scope and limitations.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Constitutional ProvisionArticle 142
Individuals Excluded2,873
Statutory Provision for QuashingSection 528 of BNSS
Total Article 142 References (1950-2023)1,579
Direct Invocations (1950-2023)791

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Constitutional Provision: Article 142
  • ›Individuals Excluded: 2,873
  • ›Target this Data: Article 142 – 1,579 references, 791 direct invocations (1950-2023)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 528 of BNSS (statutory quashing procedure)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article empowers the Supreme Court to pass orders for 'complete justice' in pending matters?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. Article 142 was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on May 27, 1949, without debate.

2. The Supreme Court in the CJP case quashed all FIRs without any exceptions.

3. Section 528 of BNSS provides the statutory procedure for quashing FIRs.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the article, how many individuals were excluded from the quashing of FIRs due to 'serious and grave criminal antecedents'?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

Why is the Supreme Court's use of Article 142 in the CJP case considered controversial?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Orders Centre to Appoint Nodal Officer for Indians Killed/Missing in Russia-Ukraine War

The Supreme Court has directed the Central Government to appoint a Nodal Officer specifically to assist the families of Indian nationals who have been killed or are missing in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. This directive underscores the judiciary's role in ensuring the executive fulfills its duty towards citizens affected by international crises.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs States to Revisit Raising Judicial Officers' Retirement Age to 61 in 2 Weeks

The Supreme Court has held that States cannot use financial burden as a valid ground to oppose enhancing the retirement age of judicial officers. It has directed all States/UTs to decide within two weeks, in consultation with High Courts, on allowing district judges to serve up to 61 years while a petition for uniform 62 years remains pending.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Clarifies July 31 Order: Media Can Report Proceedings But Cannot Use Audio-Video Clips

The Supreme Court clarified that news outlets can report court proceedings but cannot use audio or video clips in their reports. This balances open justice with preventing misuse of selective clips. Key for understanding judicial transparency and media regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Expands to 38 Judges: Diversity Deficit Exposed as Women Only 4.15%

Parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, adding 4 judges to the apex court (strength now 38). However, the article underscores a glaring lack of diversity: women constitute only 4.15% of all SC judges ever appointed, and caste representation in High Courts remains abysmally low. For exam aspirants, this links directly to the collegium system, judicial appointments, social justice, and pendency crisis.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules 1978 'Industry' Definition Not Binding on Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Supreme Court's nine-judge Constitution Bench ruled that the 1978 landmark precedent defining 'industry' will not automatically apply to the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This severs the worker-friendly expansive interpretation, creating a clean slate for future labour disputes under the new code.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Clarifies States Can Withdraw Cases Against Paper Leak Protesters; Grave Offenders Excluded

Supreme Court clarified that states can withdraw cases against students who protested peacefully against paper leaks, but this relief does not extend to those with criminal antecedents (grave and heinous offences). This balances the right to protest with public order concerns.

Polity Current Affairs

Seven Years After Article 370 Abrogation: J&K Statehood Delay Undermines Integration Gains

Seven years after the abrogation of Article 370, Jammu and Kashmir remains a Union Territory. While security gains and reduced separatism are notable, the delay in restoring statehood threatens to undermine the integration achievements. The article argues that withholding statehood now demoralises the electorate and breaches the Supreme Court's assurance of temporary UT status.