PolityGovernance
News 27 of 34

Criminal Trial Process Under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS): 12 Stages from FIR to Judgment

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
31 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:12 StagesSection 351 BNSS
Bodies:JudiciaryPolice
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The article outlines the 12 sequential stages of a criminal trial in India as per the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), replacing the earlier CrPC.

2.A key stage is the 'Statement of Accused' under Section 351 BNSS, where the court questions the accused to explain incriminating evidence.

3.Examiners frequently test the order of stages, the difference between cognisable/non-cognisable offences, and specific legal provisions like Section 351 BNSS.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The criminal trial process in India, now governed by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), is a structured 12-stage procedure designed to balance state power with individual rights. For exam aspirants, understanding this sequence from FIR filing to final judgment is critical for Polity and Law sections, as it forms the bedrock of procedural justice questions in Prelims and Mains.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Governing LawBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
Total Stages12
Key Legal ProvisionSection 351 BNSS (Statement of Accused)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Governing Law: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
  • ›Total Stages: 12
  • ›Target this Data: The total number of stages in a criminal trial (12).
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The judiciary (specifically Magistrate/Judge) who takes cognisance and frames charges.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 351 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) - Statement of the accused.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), which authority initially takes cognisance of a case based on a police chargesheet?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the criminal trial process in India:

1. For a cognisable offence, the process begins with filing a complaint directly before a magistrate.

2. The court frames charges against the accused only after the stage of recording the prosecution evidence.

3. Under Section 351 of the BNSS, the accused is questioned by the court to explain incriminating evidence.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

As per the infographic explained in the article, how many distinct stages are outlined in the criminal trial process from complaint to verdict?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary purpose of the 'Supply of Documents' stage in a criminal trial as described in the process?

All 20 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes All NEET Protest FIRs Under CJI Surya Kant; Raises Selective Justice Issue on Right to Peaceful Protest

The Supreme Court quashed all FIRs against NEET student protesters, affirming the constitutional right to peaceful protest. However, the editorial raises concerns about selective justice, noting that cases against factory workers, CAA protesters, and farmers remain pending, potentially criminalizing dissent based on the protester's identity.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

Polity Current Affairs

ECI SIR Process: 93% Inclusion Rate in WB Appeals; SC Hearing on Voter Deletions in Delhi & WB

The ECI's SIR process has led to massive disenfranchisement in West Bengal and Delhi. With only 3.2% of appeals disposed and 93% of those restored, the process is deeply flawed. The Supreme Court is hearing petitions; this has major implications for electoral integrity and universal adult franchise.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC: No Sanction Needed Under BNSS Section 218 for Disproportionate Assets Cases

The Madras High Court has ruled that no prior sanction is required under Section 197 CrPC or Section 218 BNSS to prosecute public servants for disproportionate assets, because such an offence has no nexus with official duty. The ruling, which refused to discharge former DMK Minister M.R.K. Panneerselvam and his family, clarifies a key examiner-relevant dimension of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Polity Current Affairs

ECI Voter Roll Integrity Crisis: Right to Vote vs Software, Form 6 Changes Under Scrutiny

An Indian Express investigation reveals that two Election Commissioners objected to key decisions on electoral rolls, raising constitutional questions about the right to vote being subordinated to software and bureaucratic rules. The article, written by RJD MP in Rajya Sabha, warns against the 'bureaucratisation of citizen’s right to vote' and highlights the 97 Goa voters left out due to software limitations.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Telangana MLA Danam Nagender Disqualification Under Anti-Defection Law (Tenth Schedule)

Supreme Court upheld the disqualification of Telangana MLA Danam Nagender for defecting from BRS to Congress. The court rejected the 'ghar wapsi' argument, reinforcing that voluntarily giving up party membership under the Tenth Schedule cannot be condoned by claiming regret. This judgment reaffirms judicial review over Speaker's decisions in anti-defection cases.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

From complaint to verdict: Your 12…, Current Affairs for Exams