Karnataka HC Quashes BNS Section 69 Case in 5-Year Consensual Live-In Relationship

SC Orders Fresh SIT Probe into 2012 Karnataka Rape-Murder, Sets 3-Month Deadline for Investigation

The Supreme Court has ordered a fresh SIT investigation into the 2012 rape-murder of a 17-year-old girl in Karnataka, severely criticizing the earlier probe as 'shocking the conscience'. The Court set aside the Karnataka High Court's dismissal of the victim's family plea for reinvestigation after the accused was acquitted in 2023. This landmark judgment reinforces judicial accountability for investigative failures and the right of victims to a fair probe.

Karnataka High Court: Degree or Past Employment Doesn't Negate Homemaker Status, Enhances Compensation from ₹4.55L to ₹6.52L

The Karnataka High Court ruled that a woman's education or prior employment does not disqualify her from being considered a 'homemaker' for accident compensation. This landmark judgment redefines 'homemaker' as gender-neutral and emphasizes the value of unpaid domestic work, directly impacting Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claim calculations.

Karnataka HC Orders Interim Compensation Scheme for Mob Lynching Victims; Directs Compliance in 3 Months

Karnataka High Court has declared mob lynching a 'grave threat' to rule of law and directed the state to formulate an interim compensation scheme for victims within three months. The court also reiterated the stringent provisions of BNS Section 103(2) and the need for fast-track trials, making this a critical update for UPSC and state PSC exams focusing on criminal law reforms and human rights.

Karnataka HC Upholds Rs 15 Lakh Alimony: Able-Bodied Husband Must Maintain Wife Even Without Income

Karnataka High Court affirmed Rs 15 lakh permanent alimony, ruling that an able-bodied husband cannot escape maintenance by claiming no income. The court emphasized strict adherence to Rajnesh vs Neha guidelines requiring both parties to disclose assets and liabilities before determining alimony.

Karnataka HC Refuses to Quash Case Against Firm for Relabeling Expired Food; Calls it 'Assault on Public Health'

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash a criminal case against Earth Recycler Pvt. Ltd and its representatives for allegedly relabeling expired food products with fresh expiry dates and reselling them. The court termed this a 'calculated assault on public health' and held that such acts attract provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for cheating and public mischief, beyond mere regulatory infractions under the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act. This judgment reinforces the legal principle that food safety is not just a regulatory matter but a fundamental consumer health concern, and that criminal liability can be invoked for such deceptive practices.

Bombay HC Overrules Trial Court in Tarun Tejpal Case: Victim's Past Sexual History Inadmissible

The Bombay High Court's ruling in the Tarun Tejpal case highlights persistent judicial bias against rape survivors, with courts focusing on victim's character instead of accused's conduct. Legal experts emphasize that the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 defines consent as positive agreement, yet patriarchal notions still influence rulings. For UPSC, this connects to judicial reforms, gender justice, and landmark cases like Mathura and Vishaka.

Orissa High Court: Brothel Customer Not Liable Under Immoral Traffic Act; Kerala HC Takes Contrary View

The Orissa High Court has ruled that a customer found in a brothel cannot be prosecuted under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, as the Act does not penalize customers. This creates a conflict with the Kerala High Court's recent contrary ruling, making it a key exam point for judicial interpretation and legal provisions.

Delhi HC Overturns Acquittal in 2013 Harassment Case, Upholds IPC Section 354A, POCSO Charge Dropped

Delhi High Court overturned a 2014 acquittal in a 2013 sexual harassment case, convicting the accused under IPC Section 354A while dismissing POCSO charges due to age proof deficiencies. The court delivered strong observations against victim-blaming based on clothing and character, and cautioned judicial officers against humiliating cross-examination.