What is the common examiner trap about Intl. Relations in UPSC exams?

The examiner might present the toll percentage as 20% demanded by Iran, or that the IMO supports tolls. They may also confuse the Strait of Hormuz with other chokepoints like the Suez Canal or Malacca Strait.

What should UPSC aspirants remember about Intl. Relations for Prelims?

1. Target this Data: 20% cargo toll demanded by US, IMO opposes mandatory tolls 2. Target this Nodal Body: International Maritime Organisation (IMO) - UN agency 3. Target this Legal Point: No legal basis for mandatory tolls on international straits (UNCLOS)

International RelationsSecurity

Take AI Challenge ▸

News 0 of 30

Iran Mocks US Over Strait of Hormuz Tolls; IMO Rejects 20% Cargo Fee as Illegal

Q: The International Maritime Organisation (IMO), which opposed mandatory tolls on the Strait of Hormuz, is a specialized agency of which multilateral organization?

United Nations (UN), The IMO is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for regulating shipping. Its legal stance on tolls is based on UNCLOS principles, which the UN oversees.

Q: Consider the following statements regarding the Strait of Hormuz toll dispute: 1. The United States proposed a 20% toll on cargo value to cover the costs of providing safe passage. 2. Iran, through its foreign minister, agreed that compensation for safe passage is justified but stated 20% is too high. 3. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) supported the US proposal as a legitimate security fee. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Both 1 and 2, Statement 1 is correct: Trump proposed a 20% toll. Statement 2 is correct: Iran agreed on the principle of compensation but mocked the 20% figure. Statement 3 is incorrect: The IMO rejected the legal basis for mandatory tolls, not supported them.

Q: According to the news, what percentage of cargo value did US President Donald Trump propose as reimbursement for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz?

20%, The article clearly states Trump demanded reimbursement of 20% of the value of cargo to help cover costs of providing safety and security.

Q: What is the primary legal objection raised by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) against the US's proposed toll on ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz?

There is no legal basis for mandatory tolls on international straits, The IMO explicitly stated there is no legal basis through which to introduce mandatory tolls simply to transit through a strait, referencing the principle of freedom of navigation under UNCLOS.

Intl. Relations Security & Defence EnvironmentCORE

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link

13 Jul 2026

~2 min

Source: Indian Express

Key Data:20% cargo tollIMO rejects tollsStrait of Hormuz

Bodies:IMOUS GovernmentIran Government

Practice MCQs from today's news ▸

~2 min · Quick mode

What This Article Covers

1.Trump reinstates naval blockade on Iran and proposes 20% toll on all cargo transiting Strait of Hormuz.

2.Iran mocks the US move, asserting it is the 'guardian' of the strait and will charge a 'fair' lower rate.

3.IMO rejects the legal basis for mandatory tolls on international waterways, creating a diplomatic clash.

The Big Picture

Prelims · HighMains · High

A dangerous escalation between the US and Iran over the Strait of Hormuz is unfolding. Trump’s demand for a 20% cargo toll and naval blockade has been countered by Iran asserting its own guardianship and promising a lower fee, while the IMO rejects any legal basis for such tolls. This threatens global energy security and freedom of navigation.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Proposed US Toll20% of cargo value

Iran's Counter OfferLower than 20% ('fair')

Key US OfficialPresident Donald Trump

Iranian OfficialForeign Minister Abbas Araghchi

Opposing UN BodyInternational Maritime Organisation (IMO)

1-Minute Revision

›Proposed US Toll: 20% of cargo value
›Iran's Counter Offer: Lower than 20% ('fair')
›Target this Data: 20% cargo toll demanded by US, IMO opposes mandatory tolls
›Target this Nodal Body: International Maritime Organisation (IMO) - UN agency
›Target this Legal Point: No legal basis for mandatory tolls on international straits (UNCLOS)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

News Snapshot

🚢

US Naval Blockade & Toll Demand

Trump announces naval blockade on Iran and demands 20% reimbursement of cargo value from ships using the Strait of Hormuz.

🇮🇷

Iran's Defiant Response

Foreign Minister Araghchi mocks the 20% demand, calling Iran the 'guardian' of the strait and promising a fairer, lower rate.

⚖️

IMO Rejects Toll Legality

The UN agency states there is no legal basis for mandatory tolls on ships simply transiting through international straits.

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

The Strait of Hormuz is a strategically critical chokepoint through which about 20% of the world's oil passes. Historically, the US maintained a policy of freedom of navigation, opposing any tolls. This changed following US-Israel joint attacks on Iran in February 2026, escalating tensions.

Core Analysis & Implications

Trump's demand for a 20% cargo toll represents a radical departure from US policy, effectively commercializing military presence. Iran's mockery and counter-claim of 'guardianship' highlights its longstanding assertion of control. The IMO's legal rejection adds another layer of complexity, as any toll would violate international maritime law, potentially triggering a diplomatic and legal crisis.

Escalation Risk & Global Impact

The standoff risks a return to all-out warfare. For India, which imports a significant portion of its energy through the Strait, any blockade or toll would spike oil prices, fuel inflation, and strain the current account deficit. The US move could also alienate key allies who rely on free transit.

International Law & IMO Stance

The IMO's statement underscores that under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), straits used for international navigation must enjoy freedom of transit. Any mandatory toll would be illegal unless authorized by a coastal state with sovereign rights, which Iran claims but the US contests.

Key Facts at a Glance

Proposed US Toll20% of cargo value

Iran's Counter OfferLower than 20% ('fair')

Key US OfficialPresident Donald Trump

Iranian OfficialForeign Minister Abbas Araghchi

Opposing UN BodyInternational Maritime Organisation (IMO)

You've read the full analysis. Now test your understanding.

Practice exam-style questions based on this article.

Q1Static LinkageEasyUPSC, SSC, Banking

The International Maritime Organisation (IMO), which opposed mandatory tolls on the Strait of Hormuz, is a specialized agency of which multilateral organization?

Q2Statement-basedHardUPSC, SSC

Consider the following statements regarding the Strait of Hormuz toll dispute:

1. The United States proposed a 20% toll on cargo value to cover the costs of providing safe passage.

2. Iran, through its foreign minister, agreed that compensation for safe passage is justified but stated 20% is too high.

3. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) supported the US proposal as a legitimate security fee.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasyUPSC, SSC, Banking

According to the news, what percentage of cargo value did US President Donald Trump propose as reimbursement for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz?

Q4Application/ImpactMediumUPSC, SSC, Banking

What is the primary legal objection raised by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) against the US's proposed toll on ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz?

All 15 MCQs ▸

Read original article from Indian Express

You finished this topic

Practice 3 MCQs from this news Next Article

Explore Related Topics

Intl. RelationsView Topic MCQs →Security & DefenceView Topic MCQs →EnvironmentView Topic MCQs →

Next NDA Govt Pushes Women's Reservation Amendment Bill (2029) & Delimitation Bill Requiring 2/3rd Majority

Related Current Affairs

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Iran rial hits record low at 2.02 million/USD as US prepares fresh sanctions and Strait of Hormuz blockade

Iran's rial plunged to a record low of 2.02 million per USD as the US announced new sanctions. The war with Israel and US naval blockade have devastated Iran's economy, while Iran's control of the Strait of Hormuz threatens global oil supply. This is a critical geopolitical flashpoint with implications for India's energy security and global trade.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

US-Iran Tensions: Trump Offers Talks, Oil Prices Slide $4/bbl, OPEC+ Approves 188,000 bpd Production Increase

US President Trump announces talks with Iran, calling off planned strikes, leading to a sharp drop in oil prices. Iran insists the Strait of Hormuz will not return to pre-war status, while OPEC+ approves a production increase of 188,000 bpd from September amid ongoing supply disruptions.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

US-Iran Talks on Strait of Hormuz Reopening: Oman-Backed Interim Deal Near, India's Energy Security at Stake

US President Trump claims an interim deal with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz is imminent, with Oman and Qatar mediating. Any disruption here directly impacts India's crude oil imports and global energy prices, making this a key IR and energy security topic for exams.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

MEA Rejects China's Objection to Naming 27 Places in Arunachal Pradesh, Stresses Border Peace for Bilateral Ties

India firmly rejected China's criticism over naming 27 places in Arunachal Pradesh, calling the state an 'inalienable' part of the nation. The MEA linked border peace on the LAC to the broader bilateral relationship, signaling that unresolved border issues remain the most serious constraint in India-China ties.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Houthi Capture of Perim Island Threatens Bab el-Mandeb Strait and Saudi Oil Exports via Red Sea

Houthi forces, backed by Iran, have captured Perim Island in the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments, especially after the Strait of Hormuz disruption. This move threatens Saudi Arabia's alternative Red Sea export route and could spike oil prices. Saudi airstrikes have retaliated, escalating the Yemen conflict.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

Houthis Seize Perim Island at Bab el-Mandeb Strait; Oil Prices Surge Above $100

Houthi capture of Perim Island threatens the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, a critical chokepoint for global oil and trade, especially after the Strait of Hormuz was effectively closed. This could spike oil prices above $100, impact India's energy security, and escalate the Iran-US proxy war via Yemen.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

US-Iran Talks: Key Sticking Points – Lebanon Issue, Strait of Hormuz, Crude Oil Price

After 156 days of war and an MoU, US-Iran talks resume amid uncertainty. Key issues include military aggression in Lebanon, control of the Strait of Hormuz (through which 1/5th of global oil passes), and surging crude oil prices impacting global economies, especially oil-importing nations like India.

Intl. Relations Current Affairs

US-Denmark-Greenland Security Pact Allows Permanent US Basing, Bans Non-NATO Presence in Arctic

The US-Denmark-Greenland security pact, announced on September 18, gives the US permanent basing and overflight rights in Greenland and bars non-NATO nations from building bases or making sensitive investments without US approval. It resolves the NATO strain caused by Trump's annexation demand while preserving Danish/Greenland sovereignty, and remains valid even if Greenland becomes independent. This reshapes Arctic geopolitics amid Russia's military expansion and China's growing footprint.

Start Today's Quiz(15 Qs)

Take Today's Quiz

15 Qs • 5-7 Mins

Iran Mocks US Over Strait of Hormuz Tolls; IMO Rejects 20% Cargo Fee as Illegal

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

1-Minute Revision

News Snapshot

US Naval Blockade & Toll Demand

Iran's Defiant Response

IMO Rejects Toll Legality

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

Core Analysis & Implications

Escalation Risk & Global Impact

International Law & IMO Stance

Prelims Flashpoints

Key Facts at a Glance