PolityGovernance
News 13 of 27

Rajasthan HC: Judicial Infrastructure Constitutional Duty, Not Govt Favour; Cites Article 21

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
17 Sept 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:₹117.65 crore24 months40% urgent attention21 metres highArticle 21
Bodies:Rajasthan High CourtIIT BombayPublic Works Department
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Rajasthan HC declares judicial infrastructure a constitutional obligation, not executive discretion.

2.Court cites Article 21, stating inadequate facilities violate access to justice.

3.IIT Bombay report: 21m high Central Dome in imminent collapse; restoration cost estimated at ₹117.65 crore.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that providing adequate judicial infrastructure is a constitutional duty of the state, not a favour. The court rejected financial constraints as an excuse, linking infrastructure to Article 21 (right to life and liberty), and ordered restoration of its Jodhpur building's Central Dome, which IIT Bombay found to be in imminent danger of collapse.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtRajasthan High Court
BenchChief Justice Sanjay K Agrawal & Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur
Constitutional Article CitedArticle 21 (Right to Life and Liberty)
Key Infrastructure IssueCentral Dome, 21m high, in imminent collapse
Expert OpinionIIT Bombay
Restoration Cost₹117.65 crore
Timeline24 months for phased rehabilitation

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Rajasthan High Court
  • ›Bench: Chief Justice Sanjay K Agrawal & Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur
  • ›Target this Data: ₹117.65 crore restoration cost; 40% of building needs urgent attention; 24 months timeline
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Rajasthan High Court (Principal Seat: Jodhpur); IIT Bombay (expert opinion)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life and Liberty) linked to judicial infrastructure

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which institution provided the expert structural assessment of the Rajasthan High Court building's Central Dome?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Rajasthan High Court's ruling on judicial infrastructure:

1. The court held that judicial infrastructure is a matter of executive discretion and government favour.

2. The court linked adequate judicial infrastructure to the right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

3. The court said financial considerations cannot be used to perpetually deny basic facilities for judicial functions.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What is the estimated total cost for the phased rehabilitation of the Rajasthan High Court building in Jodhpur?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary significance of the Rajasthan High Court's ruling for the Indian constitutional framework?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Rajasthan HC: Govt Employee Resigning to Contest Polls Cannot Seek Reinstatement Under CCS Rules 2021

The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a government employee who voluntarily resigns to contest assembly elections cannot claim reinstatement after losing the election, as contesting polls does not constitute a 'material change in circumstances' under Rule 26(5) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021. The judgment upholds the mandatory principle of political neutrality for civil servants under the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964.

Polity Current Affairs

Seven Years After Article 370 Abrogation: J&K Statehood Delay Undermines Integration Gains

Seven years after the abrogation of Article 370, Jammu and Kashmir remains a Union Territory. While security gains and reduced separatism are notable, the delay in restoring statehood threatens to undermine the integration achievements. The article argues that withholding statehood now demoralises the electorate and breaches the Supreme Court's assurance of temporary UT status.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs States to Revisit Raising Judicial Officers' Retirement Age to 61 in 2 Weeks

The Supreme Court has held that States cannot use financial burden as a valid ground to oppose enhancing the retirement age of judicial officers. It has directed all States/UTs to decide within two weeks, in consultation with High Courts, on allowing district judges to serve up to 61 years while a petition for uniform 62 years remains pending.

Polity Current Affairs

Lok Sabha Passes Kerala (Alteration of Name) Bill, 2026; State Renamed 'Keralam' via Article 3

The Lok Sabha has passed the Kerala (Alteration of Name) Bill, 2026, to change the state's name from 'Kerala' to 'Keralam' in the Constitution. The Bill follows two unanimous state assembly resolutions and must now be passed by Rajya Sabha and receive President's assent. This is a key example of Article 3 procedure for state name change.

Polity Current Affairs

J&K Assembly Debates Statehood Resolution; NC MLAs Move Amendments for Article 370, 35A

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah moved a resolution for restoring full statehood, referencing a 2000 autonomy resolution. Six NC MLAs and opposition parties have moved amendments demanding the inclusion of Article 370 and 35A restoration, making this a key test of the current assembly's stance on pre-2019 constitutional status.

Polity Current Affairs

Karnataka HC Quashes KPSC Chairperson Suspension; Governor's Independent Action Invalid Under Article 317(1)

Karnataka High Court reinstates KPSC Chairperson Sahukar, ruling that the Governor's suspension order was invalid because it was passed without the aid and advice of the State Cabinet. This reaffirms the constitutional principle that the Governor is bound by Cabinet advice, even in matters concerning removal of SPSC members under Article 317(1). Important for understanding Governor's discretionary powers and the role of the Supreme Court in such inquiries.

Polity Current Affairs

Governor Suspends KPSC Chairman Under Article 317(2) for Second Time Amid Recruitment Scam

Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot has suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa S. Sahukar for the second time, this time with Cabinet approval, under Article 317(2) of the Constitution. The suspension follows a High Court order quashing the Governor's earlier unilateral suspension, and comes amid ED raids related to bribery in veterinary officer recruitments. This case highlights the constitutional balance between Governor's powers and Cabinet aid and advice.

Polity Current Affairs

J&K High Court Quashes PSA Detention Over Bovine Transport: Holds Procedural Lapses Violate Constitutional Guarantee

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court quashed preventive detention under Public Safety Act for bovine transport, citing lack of subjective satisfaction on public order impact and non-communication of the right to make representation to the detaining authority. The ruling reinforces that procedural safeguards in preventive detention are mandatory and must be strictly complied with.

‘Judicial infra a constitutional…, Current Affairs for Exams