The Kerala High Court dismissed a plea challenging a preventive detention order against an individual already in judicial custody. The Court held that the 'triple test' from the SC's Kamarunnissa case was satisfied, validating the detention under the Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007, even without a specific recital on bail likelihood.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Act Invoked: Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act (KAAPA), 2007
- ›Section Used: Section 3(1)
- ›Target this Legal Point: 'Triple Test' from Kamarunnissa v. Union of India (1991)
- ›Target this Act: Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act (KAAPA), 2007 - Section 3(1)
- ›Target this Principle: Preventive detention can be valid even if the accused is in judicial custody, subject to the 'triple test'.
- ›Target this Detail: The detention order was for a period of six months.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.