PolityGovernance
News 10 of 29

Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill 2026 Proposes 10-Year Jail, ₹7 Lakh Fine for Coercive Conversions

PolityHIGH
Target:MPSCUPSC GS-IITeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
13 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:10 years imprisonment₹7 lakh fineFreedom of Religion Bill, 2026
Bodies:Maharashtra GovernmentMaharashtra Legislative Assembly
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Maharashtra introduced the 'Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026' in the Assembly to ban unlawful religious conversions.

2.The Bill prescribes severe penalties, including imprisonment up to 10 years and a fine of up to ₹7 lakh for forcible conversions.

3.The legislation targets conversions carried out through specific means like coercion, fraud, inducement, or marriage, highlighting a state-specific governance approach to a contentious national issue.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Maharashtra government has introduced a stringent anti-conversion law, the Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026, during its Budget Session. The Bill aims to protect religious freedom by prohibiting conversions achieved through coercion, fraud, inducement, or marriage, with penalties up to 10 years imprisonment and a ₹7 lakh fine. This move aligns with similar laws in other states and raises significant questions about religious liberty and state regulation.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bill NameFreedom of Religion Bill, 2026
Maximum Punishment10 years imprisonment
Maximum Fine₹7 lakh
Introduced InMaharashtra Assembly Budget Session

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bill Name: Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026
  • ›Maximum Punishment: 10 years imprisonment
  • ›Target this Data: Maximum penalty is 10 years imprisonment and ₹7 lakh fine.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Maharashtra State Government / Minister of State for Home introduced the Bill.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The Bill is named the 'Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026' and targets conversions via coercion, fraud, inducement, or marriage.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article guarantees the freedom of religion, which the Maharashtra Bill claims to protect?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026 introduced in Maharashtra:

1. It proposes imprisonment up to 10 years for forcible religious conversions.

2. The Bill was introduced by the Minister of State for Home during the ongoing Budget Session.

3. The Bill prohibits conversions only if carried out through coercion or fraud, but not through inducement or marriage.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What is the maximum monetary fine prescribed for forcible conversion under the proposed Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

According to the news, what is the primary stated objective of the Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Maharashtra Tightens Minority Status Approval: IAS Oversight, Multi-Dept Vetting, Periodic Reviews

The Reddy committee report recommends structural overhaul of minority status approval for educational institutions in Maharashtra, introducing IAS supervision, multi-department scrutiny, and post-grant periodic reviews. The new SOP, expected by end of August 2026, aims to address irregularities in the approval process.

Polity Current Affairs

Maharashtra Panel Recommends BNS Amendment for Social Media Defamation After 11 Years of 66A

A Maharashtra government committee has recommended amending the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to specifically criminalize defamatory social media posts, 11 years after the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act. The move aims to tackle online defamation while incorporating safeguards against misuse, but faces legal scrutiny over potential conflict with free speech rights under Article 19(1)(a).

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Strikes Down Maharashtra’s Methanol Denaturing Rules as Unconstitutional: Violates Articles 14 & 19(1)(g)

Supreme Court struck down Maharashtra's Rules 18A & 18B of the Poisons Rules mandating colourant/bitterant in methanol, holding them disproportionate and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The court also issued detailed guidelines to prevent hooch tragedies. This judgment is critical for understanding proportionality test and state regulation of industrial poisons.

Polity Current Affairs

2.08 Crore Maharashtra Voters May Be Left Out of Aug 24 SIR Draft Roll Due to Enumeration Gap

Over 2.08 crore (21.25%) of Maharashtra's 9.79 crore voters may be excluded from the August 24 draft electoral roll due to uncollected enumeration forms during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). This is a draft and voters have until September 23 to seek inclusion. The issue is acute in urban districts like Thane, Mumbai, and Pune.

Polity Current Affairs

Special Intensive Revision: 43.7% Voters Untraceable in 25 Urban Maharashtra Seats

Maharashtra's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls after 24 years reveals that over 40% of voters in 25 urban constituencies could not be traced, threatening their inclusion in the draft roll. This highlights systemic issues in urban voter registration and the challenges of maintaining accurate electoral rolls in high-mobility areas.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Waqf Board Proposes Revised Nikahnama Aligned with UCC; Interfaith Marriages under Special Marriage Act

Over 1.5 years after Uttarakhand implemented the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), the State Waqf Board has proposed a revised nikahnama to bring Muslim marriage registrations in line with the new law. The proposal bans conversions solely for marriage and mandates interfaith couples to register under the Special Marriage Act, marking a significant step in UCC implementation.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Rules Cinema Halls Private Property, Upholds Food Pricing Freedom in Multiplexes

The Supreme Court's 2023 ruling in KC Cinema vs JK holds multiplexes as private property, allowing owners to set food prices and ban outside food. Despite public outcry over exorbitant prices (popcorn ₹340-₹570), the Legal Metrology Department can only check MRP compliance, not fix prices.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Proposes Article 371(K) for Ladakh: Directly Elected Body with Legislative Powers

The Centre has proposed adding Article 371(K) to the Constitution to grant Ladakh a directly elected governing body with legislative powers over land, culture, forests, and natural resources. This marks a potential shift from the Sixth Schedule model used in the Northeast and is the first such special provision for a Union Territory. The proposal remains a draft, with key powers like police and finance still under negotiation.