PolityGovernance
News 2 of 24

Opposition Drafts Impeachment Motion Against CEC Gyanesh Kumar Under Article 324(5) and Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
10 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Article 324(5)Article 124(4)Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968100 Lok Sabha MPs50 Rajya Sabha MPs
Bodies:Election Commission of IndiaParliament
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Opposition is drafting an impeachment motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar, alleging biased conduct during electoral roll revision in West Bengal.

2.The removal process for a CEC is identical to that of a Supreme Court Judge, as mandated by Article 324(5) of the Constitution.

3.The motion requires signatures from 100 Lok Sabha MPs or 50 Rajya Sabha MPs, followed by a committee investigation as per the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

An Opposition-led impeachment motion against the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) highlights the rarely invoked constitutional removal process. This news is crucial for exam aspirants as it tests deep understanding of Articles 324 and 124, the Judges (Inquiry) Act, and the procedural safeguards for independent constitutional bodies.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CEC Removal ProcessSame as Supreme Court Judge (Article 324(5))
Motion SignaturesLok Sabha: 100 MPs, Rajya Sabha: 50 MPs
Investigating Committee3 members: SC Judge, HC CJ, Distinguished Jurist
Grounds for RemovalProved misbehaviour or incapacity

1-Minute Revision

  • ›CEC Removal Process: Same as Supreme Court Judge (Article 324(5))
  • ›Motion Signatures: Lok Sabha: 100 MPs, Rajya Sabha: 50 MPs
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 324(5) - CEC removal process identical to Supreme Court Judge.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 124(4) - Grounds and process for removal of a Supreme Court Judge.
  • ›Target this Data: Motion requires signatures of 100 Lok Sabha MPs or 50 Rajya Sabha MPs (Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional body's removal process is identical to that of the Chief Election Commissioner, as per Article 324(5)?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the impeachment process for a Chief Election Commissioner:

1. A motion for removal must be signed by at least 100 members of the Lok Sabha.

2. The grounds for removal are 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity' as per the Constitution.

3. If the motion is admitted, the Speaker/Chairman must set up a three-member committee consisting of a Supreme Court Judge, a High Court Chief Justice, and a distinguished jurist.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, how many members of the Rajya Sabha must sign a motion for the removal of a Supreme Court Judge (or CEC)?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional objective of making the removal process of a Chief Election Commissioner identical to that of a Supreme Court Judge?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Split Verdict on CEC/EC Appointment Act, 2023; Matter Referred to CJI for Constitution Bench

A two-judge Supreme Court bench has split on whether to refer the challenge to the CEC and ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 to a five-judge Constitution Bench. With Justice Dipankar Datta disagreeing with Justice S C Sharma, the case now goes to the CJI for constituting a larger bench. For aspirants, this is a direct link to Article 324, the Anoop Baranwal verdict, and the independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

CEC Gyanesh Kumar: ECI Targets 100% Voter Registration for 18+; ECINET App Introduces Parental Declaration in Form-6

CEC Gyanesh Kumar announced the Election Commission's goal of universal voter enrollment for all citizens above 18. The ECINET app now enables digital submission of Form-6 with a new declaration requiring applicants to provide their parents' polling station details from the last Special Intensive Revision (SIR). This drive involves 11 lakh Booth Level Officers and is part of a nationwide effort covering 19 states where SIR is ongoing.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to 2023 EC Appointment Law to 5-Judge Constitution Bench

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of Election Commissioners to a 5-judge Constitution Bench after a split verdict. The law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the selection committee, raising concerns about executive dominance and independence of the Election Commission. This case is crucial for exam aspirants as it involves constitutional principles of independence of constitutional bodies and separation of powers.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Refers 2023 CEC Appointment Law to CJI for Constitution Bench; Excludes CJI from Selection Panel

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of CEC and ECs to the CJI for consideration of a Constitution Bench. The law replaced the CJI with a Cabinet minister in the selection panel, raising concerns about executive influence. A split verdict between two judges led to the referral.

Polity Current Affairs

Anoop Baranwal Principle vs Prescription: SC Split on Referral of CEC Appointment Act Challenge

The Supreme Court's two-judge bench split on whether to refer the challenge to the 2023 CEC Appointment Act to a Constitution Bench. Justice Datta held that the Anoop Baranwal principle (appointments free from exclusive executive control) is binding, while the specific committee composition (including CJI) was advisory; thus the challenge raises only application, not interpretation. Justice Sharma disagreed, citing need for independent examination. This debate is crucial for understanding the constitutional independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

EC Decision-Making Under Scrutiny: Article 324, CEC Act 2023, Dissent Notes Explained

The Election Commission's internal dissent has come under the spotlight after two Election Commissioners recorded objections 14 times in 10 months. This raises critical questions about the functioning of a constitutional body, the balance between unanimity and majority decision-making, and the protection of dissenting voices — a core area for UPSC and State PSC exams.

Polity Current Affairs

Judges (Inquiry) Act 1968 Invoked: Panel Finds Unexplained Cash at Justice Varma’s Residence, Report Tabled in Parliament

A three-member parliamentary inquiry committee under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 has found that former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma failed to explain the source of cash bundles discovered in his official residence after a fire. This is a rare invocation of the judicial removal mechanism, making it crucial for understanding the process of judicial accountability and the role of Parliament in the impeachment of judges.

Polity Current Affairs

ECI Voter Roll Integrity Crisis: Right to Vote vs Software, Form 6 Changes Under Scrutiny

An Indian Express investigation reveals that two Election Commissioners objected to key decisions on electoral rolls, raising constitutional questions about the right to vote being subordinated to software and bureaucratic rules. The article, written by RJD MP in Rajya Sabha, warns against the 'bureaucratisation of citizen’s right to vote' and highlights the 97 Goa voters left out due to software limitations.