PolityGovernance
News 13 of 22

Parliament Increases Supreme Court Judges Strength from 34 to 38 via Amendment Bill, 2026

PolityCORE
Target:MPSCUPSC GS-IISSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
04 Aug 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:34 to 38 judgesSupreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026August 3, 2026
Bodies:ParliamentSupreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Lok Sabha passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, increasing the sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges (including CJI).

2.This is the first increase since 2019, when the strength was raised from 31 to 34 judges.

3.The Bill amends the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956 – a key static GK linkage for Polity exams.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

Parliament has increased the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges (including CJI) for the first time since 2019. The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, was passed by Lok Sabha on August 3, 2026, replacing an ordinance. The move aims to address the growing backlog of cases in the apex court.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Old Sanctioned Strength34 (including CJI)
New Sanctioned Strength38 (including CJI)
Previous Increase Year2019 (from 31 to 34)
Bill DateLok Sabha passed on August 3, 2026

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Old Sanctioned Strength: 34 (including CJI)
  • ›New Sanctioned Strength: 38 (including CJI)
  • ›Target this Data: Supreme Court sanctioned strength increased from 34 to 38 judges (2026)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Parliament (Lok Sabha passed the Bill)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Amendment to the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Act, 1956

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which Act governs the number of judges in the Supreme Court of India?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026:

1. The Bill increases the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India.

2. The Bill was passed by the Rajya Sabha on August 3, 2026.

3. This is the first increase in the strength of the Supreme Court since 2019.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What was the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court before the 2026 amendment?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary reason cited by the government for increasing the number of Supreme Court judges?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

AP High Court Declares Three-Capitals Petitions Infructuous; Amaravati Now Sole Capital Under AP Reorganisation (Amendment) Act 2026

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has deemed all petitions against the proposed three-capitals model as infructuous after Parliament amended the AP Reorganisation Act, 2014, making Amaravati the sole capital by law. This ends a long-standing political and legal battle, with implications for state governance and federal structure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to 2023 EC Appointment Law to 5-Judge Constitution Bench

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of Election Commissioners to a 5-judge Constitution Bench after a split verdict. The law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the selection committee, raising concerns about executive dominance and independence of the Election Commission. This case is crucial for exam aspirants as it involves constitutional principles of independence of constitutional bodies and separation of powers.

Polity Current Affairs

Parliament Passes Mines and Minerals Amendment Act 2026 Overriding SC Ruling, Extinguishes Rs 2 Lakh Cr Dues

The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2026 restricts states from imposing specified levies on mineral rights and extinguishes ~Rs 2 lakh crore in unpaid dues. Mineral-rich states like Odisha and Jharkhand oppose it as a blow to federal fiscal autonomy, potentially losing thousands of crores annually. This reverses the financial impact of a landmark 2024 Supreme Court ruling that had empowered states to tax mineral-bearing lands.

Polity Current Affairs

Judges (Inquiry) Act 1968 Invoked: Panel Finds Unexplained Cash at Justice Varma’s Residence, Report Tabled in Parliament

A three-member parliamentary inquiry committee under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 has found that former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma failed to explain the source of cash bundles discovered in his official residence after a fire. This is a rare invocation of the judicial removal mechanism, making it crucial for understanding the process of judicial accountability and the role of Parliament in the impeachment of judges.

Polity Current Affairs

Parliament Passes MMDR Amendment 2026 Restricting States' Levy Powers on Mineral Rights

Parliament has passed the Mines and Minerals (Amendment) Bill, 2026, limiting states' power to impose taxes on mineral rights, overriding a Supreme Court judgment that upheld such state powers. This move aims to boost investment certainty but has sparked concerns over fiscal federalism and state revenues, especially for mineral-rich states like Odisha, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh.

Polity Current Affairs

Govt to SC: Only Parliament Can Extend Creamy Layer to SC/ST; Cites Article 341, E V Chinnaiah Case

The government has told the Supreme Court that extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST is a policy decision for Parliament alone. This reaffirms that reservation for SC/ST is based on historical social criteria, not just economic status, and the creamy layer concept currently applies only to OBCs.

Polity Current Affairs

Parliament Passes Tribunals Reforms Bill 2026: National Tribunals Commission, 5-Year Tenure After SC Directive

Parliament has passed the Tribunals Reforms Bill, 2026, establishing a National Tribunals Commission and fixing tribunal members' tenure at five years. The law follows the Supreme Court's November 2025 judgment that struck down the 2021 Act, in a long-running tussle over tribunal independence and executive control.

Why has Parliament increased the…, Current Affairs for Exams