A PIL in the Supreme Court seeks to bridge a legal gap under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Currently, the Act recognizes only victims who had acid thrown on them, excluding those forced to ingest acid. The plea argues this violates Articles 14 and 21, as the penal law (BNS) punishes both acts equally.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›RPwD Act Year: 2016
- ›BNS Section for Acid Attack: Section 124
- ›Target this Data: 198 pending acid attack cases in Uttar Pradesh (as per SC data).
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (handling the PIL) and the Union Government (for framing policy).
- ›Target this Legal Point: Section 124 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - 'Causing hurt by use of acid, etc.'
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.