What is the common examiner trap about Polity in UPSC exams?

Examiners may confuse 'State Bar Council' with 'Bar Council of India' (the national apex body) or ask about the composition of the 'Supreme Court Collegium' vs. 'High Court Collegium'. They may also create a statement swapping 'retention' with 'entry' as the main challenge.

What should UPSC aspirants remember about Polity for Prelims?

1. Target this Data: 'At least 30% seats in State Bar Councils be reserved for women'. 2. Target this Nodal Body: 'High Court Collegiums' and 'Indian Women in Law (iWiL)'. 3. Target this Fact: 'Since 2021, no woman judge has been elevated to the SC despite 34 appointments.'

PolityGovernance

Take AI Challenge ▸

News 0 of 17

CJI Urges High Court Collegiums to Ensure 30% Women Bar Council Seats, Proposes SC Advocate Consideration for Bench Diversity

Q: The Chief Justice of India, in the context of improving gender diversity, urged which body to take concrete steps?

High Court Collegiums, As per the article, CJI Surya Kant specifically called on 'High Court collegiums' to take concrete steps to improve women's representation. The Supreme Court Collegium deals with SC appointments, while HC collegiums handle HC appointments.

Q: Consider the following statements regarding the issue of women's representation in the judiciary discussed in the article: 1. Chief Justice of India Surya Kant stated that institutional intent must be accompanied by institutional imagination. 2. A key measure mentioned to strengthen the pipeline is a direction mandating at least 30% seats in the Bar Council of India be reserved for women. 3. Justice B V Nagarathna identified the central challenge as the entry of women into the legal profession. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Only 1, Statement 1 is correct as the CJI indeed said, 'Institutional intent is no longer enough. It must always be accompanied by institutional imagination.' Statement 2 is incorrect because the reservation of 'at least 30% seats' is for State Bar Councils, not the Bar Council of India. Statement 3 is incorrect as Justice Nagarathna identified 'retention', not 'entry', as the central challenge.

Q: According to former Supreme Court judge Justice Hima Kohli, how many women judges have been elevated to the Supreme Court since 2021?

Zero, Justice Hima Kohli explicitly noted, 'since 2021, no woman judge has been elevated to the SC. Almost 34 appointments were made. Not a single woman.' This is a direct factual data point from the article.

Q: What was the primary objective behind the CJI's suggestion to High Court collegiums regarding considering women advocates from the Supreme Court?

To address the unavailability of suitable women candidates within a particular age bracket at the state level, The article states that the CJI suggested that 'Where suitable candidates within a particular age bracket are not readily available, collegiums should widen the zone of consideration to include women advocates practising in the Supreme Court who belong to the particular state.' This directly aims to solve the pipeline problem at the state level.

Polity Social IssuesHIGH

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link

08 Mar 2026

~2 min

Source: Indian Express

Key Data:At least 30% seats in State Bar Councils for womenZero women SC judges elevated since 202134 SC appointments since 2021

Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaHigh Court CollegiumsIndian Women in Law (iWiL)State Bar Councils

Practice MCQs from today's news ▸

~2 min · Quick mode

What This Article Covers

1.Chief Justice of India Surya Kant emphasized that ensuring women's representation in the judiciary is about 'equal opportunity', not preference, and called for institutional imagination from HC collegiums.

2.The CJI pointed to a key institutional measure: a direction mandating at least 30% seats in State Bar Councils be reserved for women, stating, 'If the pipeline is narrow at its source, the Bench cannot later be broad.'

3.Judges highlighted the core challenge of retention, not entry, and noted that since 2021, no woman judge has been elevated to the Supreme Court despite 34 appointments.

The Big Picture

Prelims · MediumMains · High

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has urged High Court collegiums to take concrete steps to improve gender diversity in the judiciary, highlighting the institutional and structural barriers limiting women's representation. This news is critical for UPSC aspirants as it touches upon judicial appointments, constitutional morality, and social justice dimensions, a recurring theme in Mains GS-II.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Women in Bar CouncilsAt least 30% seats reserved

Women SC Appointments since 2021Zero

Total SC Appointments since 202134

Conference OrganizerIndian Women in Law (iWiL)

1-Minute Revision

›Women in Bar Councils: At least 30% seats reserved
›Women SC Appointments since 2021: Zero
›Target this Data: 'At least 30% seats in State Bar Councils be reserved for women'.
›Target this Nodal Body: 'High Court Collegiums' and 'Indian Women in Law (iWiL)'.
›Target this Fact: 'Since 2021, no woman judge has been elevated to the SC despite 34 appointments.'

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

News Snapshot

⚖️

Judicial Diversity Push

CJI Surya Kant urges High Court collegiums to adopt concrete measures, including considering Supreme Court advocates from states, to improve women's representation on the Bench.

🔧

Institutional Mechanism

A key measure to strengthen the 'pipeline' is a direction mandating reservation of at least 30% of seats in State Bar Councils for women.

📉

Attrition Challenge

Justice B V Nagarathna identified the central challenge as the retention of women in litigation long enough to be eligible for elevation, not their entry into the profession.

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

The issue of gender disparity in the Indian judiciary is longstanding. Women constitute only about 13% of High Court judges and have seen sporadic representation in the Supreme Court. The collegium system, responsible for judicial appointments, has often been criticized for lacking transparency and adequate diversity. This conference highlights a renewed institutional focus on addressing this gap.

Core Analysis & Implications

The CJI's statement shifts the discourse from 'intent' to 'imagination', urging proactive steps like widening the consideration zone to include women Supreme Court advocates from respective states. Justice Nagarathna's point on 'retention' underscores deeper structural barriers within the profession and societal expectations. The statistic of zero women among 34 recent SC appointments starkly highlights the systemic nature of the problem, questioning the credibility of the process.

Future Outlook / Way Forward

The immediate way forward lies with High Court collegiums implementing the CJI's suggestions. Long-term solutions require addressing attrition by creating a more supportive ecosystem within courts and law firms, implementing robust maternity and childcare policies, and ensuring objective, transparent selection processes as highlighted by Justice Ujjal Bhuyan. Sustained advocacy and data-driven monitoring will be crucial.

Key Facts at a Glance

Women in Bar CouncilsAt least 30% seats reserved

Women SC Appointments since 2021Zero

Total SC Appointments since 202134

Conference OrganizerIndian Women in Law (iWiL)

You've read the full analysis. Now test your understanding.

Practice exam-style questions based on this article.

Q1Static LinkageEasyUPSC, SSC, State PSC

The Chief Justice of India, in the context of improving gender diversity, urged which body to take concrete steps?

Q2Statement-basedHardUPSC

Consider the following statements regarding the issue of women's representation in the judiciary discussed in the article:

1. Chief Justice of India Surya Kant stated that institutional intent must be accompanied by institutional imagination.

2. A key measure mentioned to strengthen the pipeline is a direction mandating at least 30% seats in the Bar Council of India be reserved for women.

3. Justice B V Nagarathna identified the central challenge as the entry of women into the legal profession.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMediumUPSC, SSC, State PSC

According to former Supreme Court judge Justice Hima Kohli, how many women judges have been elevated to the Supreme Court since 2021?

Q4Application/ImpactMediumUPSC, State PSC

What was the primary objective behind the CJI's suggestion to High Court collegiums regarding considering women advocates from the Supreme Court?

All 25 MCQs ▸

Read original article from Indian Express

You finished this topic

Practice 3 MCQs from this news Next Article

Explore Related Topics

PolityView Topic MCQs →Social IssuesView Topic MCQs →

Next IT Ministry Proposes Separate Law for Graded Social Media Restrictions on Children (8-12, 12-16, 16-18 Years)

Related Current Affairs

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Expands to 38 Judges: Diversity Deficit Exposed as Women Only 4.15%

Parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, adding 4 judges to the apex court (strength now 38). However, the article underscores a glaring lack of diversity: women constitute only 4.15% of all SC judges ever appointed, and caste representation in High Courts remains abysmally low. For exam aspirants, this links directly to the collegium system, judicial appointments, social justice, and pendency crisis.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Exempting Current Class 6 from Three-Language Policy; Centre Seeks More Time

The Supreme Court has proposed exempting the current Class 6 batch from the mandatory three-language policy, suggesting implementation from January 1, 2027. The Centre has sought more time to decide, while the court has asked for details on teacher availability and infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Special Courts for CBI & NIA Cases on Manipur Ethnic Violence; 891 Witnesses Yet to Testify

The Supreme Court has proposed setting up exclusive Special Courts to hear cases related to the 2023 Manipur ethnic violence investigated by the CBI and NIA, highlighting the slow pace of trials. With 891 out of 904 witnesses yet to be examined and serious charges including sexual violence, this move aims to expedite justice. For exam aspirants, this links to judicial administration, Article 14 (speedy trial), and the role of special courts under the NIA Act.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Reduces NEET-SS Qualifying Percentile to 30% for Special Stray Vacancy Round; 40 Seats Returned to TN

The Centre agreed in the Supreme Court to lower the NEET-SS qualifying percentile from 50% to 30% for a special stray vacancy round, aiming to fill 1,857 vacant super-speciality seats. Additionally, 40 vacant in-service seats originally diverted to the All-India Quota will be returned to Tamil Nadu for its own counselling, a significant win for the state's in-service reservation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

SC 9-Judge Bench Rules BWSSB Triple Test Not Binding for IRC 2020 Section 2(p)

The Supreme Court's 9-judge bench has held that the landmark 1978 'Triple Test' for defining 'industry' under the ID Act will not be a binding precedent for interpreting the identical provision in the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This could weaken worker protections just as more workers move to the private sector post-liberalisation.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules 1978 'Industry' Definition Not Binding on Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Supreme Court's nine-judge Constitution Bench ruled that the 1978 landmark precedent defining 'industry' will not automatically apply to the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This severs the worker-friendly expansive interpretation, creating a clean slate for future labour disputes under the new code.

Polity Current Affairs

SC's 76-Year Journey: Reforms at Magistracy Level Needed for Judicial Overhaul

A former Delhi High Court judge critiques the Indian judiciary's performance over 76 years, highlighting issues like eviction of poor without rehabilitation, failure to curb extra-legal punishments, and delay in upholding progressive judgments. The article argues that meaningful judicial reform must begin at the magisterial level, focusing on mentoring, mental health support, and performance evaluation reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Replies on NRC ID Cards: 3.11 Crore Await Documents, 19 Lakh Excluded

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre and Assam government to respond to pleas seeking issuance of identity cards to 3.11 crore people included in the National Register of Citizens (NRC) 2019, while another 19 lakh excluded persons await the appeal process. This case is critical for exam aspirants as it tests knowledge of the Citizenship Act, NRC process, and Assam Accord provisions.

Start Today's Quiz(25 Qs)

Take Today's Quiz

25 Qs • 5-7 Mins

CJI Urges High Court Collegiums to Ensure 30% Women Bar Council Seats, Proposes SC Advocate Consideration for Bench Diversity

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

1-Minute Revision

News Snapshot

Judicial Diversity Push

Institutional Mechanism

Attrition Challenge

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

Core Analysis & Implications

Future Outlook / Way Forward

Prelims Flashpoints

Key Facts at a Glance