PolitySocial_Issues
News 13 of 22

SC Bars Police from Investigating PCPNDT Act Offences, Designated Authorities Only

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
20 Aug 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:August 20, 2026PCPNDT Act, 1994Bench: Justices Sanjay Karol and N. Kotiswar Singh
Bodies:Supreme Court of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Supreme Court held that police cannot investigate offences under the PCPNDT Act, 1994; only designated authorities can.

2.The ruling applies to offences under the PCPNDT Act but does not bar police from investigating other independent criminal offences.

3.The Bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and N. Kotiswar Singh emphasized the technical and medical nature of the Act requiring specialized investigators.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court has ruled that police cannot investigate offences under the PCPNDT Act, 1994, as the law concerns technical and medical matters requiring specialized knowledge. Only authorities designated under the Act can conduct investigations, while police may play a supplementary role. This judgment clarifies the jurisdictional limits of police in enforcing laws against prenatal sex determination.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Date of JudgmentAugust 20, 2026
CourtSupreme Court of India
BenchJustices Sanjay Karol and N. Kotiswar Singh
Act in QuestionPre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Date of Judgment: August 20, 2026
  • ›Court: Supreme Court of India
  • ›Target this Data: August 20, 2026 (date of judgment)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which court passed the judgment that police cannot investigate offences under the PCPNDT Act?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's judgment on the PCPNDT Act:

1. Police cannot investigate offences under the PCPNDT Act.

2. Police have no role whatsoever in matters related to the PCPNDT Act.

3. The restriction applies only to offences under the PCPNDT Act and does not restrict police powers to investigate independent criminal offences.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did the Supreme Court deliver the judgment barring police from investigating PCPNDT Act offences?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary reason cited by the Supreme Court for barring police from investigating PCPNDT Act offences?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Forms HPEC Led by Justice R Subhash Reddy to Probe Police Excesses During NEET Protests

The Supreme Court has constituted a High-Powered Enquiry Committee (HPEC), led by former SC judge Justice R Subhash Reddy, to investigate the alleged disproportionate use of force by police against protesters at Jantar Mantar and other locations during the NEET-UG paper leak protests. The panel will examine 12 critical issues including use of pellet guns, targeting of female protesters, and the misuse of legal provisions like Section 163 BNSS and Section 152 BNS.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Exempting Current Class 6 from Three-Language Policy; Centre Seeks More Time

The Supreme Court has proposed exempting the current Class 6 batch from the mandatory three-language policy, suggesting implementation from January 1, 2027. The Centre has sought more time to decide, while the court has asked for details on teacher availability and infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

SC's 76-Year Journey: Reforms at Magistracy Level Needed for Judicial Overhaul

A former Delhi High Court judge critiques the Indian judiciary's performance over 76 years, highlighting issues like eviction of poor without rehabilitation, failure to curb extra-legal punishments, and delay in upholding progressive judgments. The article argues that meaningful judicial reform must begin at the magisterial level, focusing on mentoring, mental health support, and performance evaluation reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Replies on NRC ID Cards: 3.11 Crore Await Documents, 19 Lakh Excluded

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre and Assam government to respond to pleas seeking issuance of identity cards to 3.11 crore people included in the National Register of Citizens (NRC) 2019, while another 19 lakh excluded persons await the appeal process. This case is critical for exam aspirants as it tests knowledge of the Citizenship Act, NRC process, and Assam Accord provisions.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Special Courts for CBI & NIA Cases on Manipur Ethnic Violence; 891 Witnesses Yet to Testify

The Supreme Court has proposed setting up exclusive Special Courts to hear cases related to the 2023 Manipur ethnic violence investigated by the CBI and NIA, highlighting the slow pace of trials. With 891 out of 904 witnesses yet to be examined and serious charges including sexual violence, this move aims to expedite justice. For exam aspirants, this links to judicial administration, Article 14 (speedy trial), and the role of special courts under the NIA Act.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Reduces NEET-SS Qualifying Percentile to 30%; 1,857 Seats in Stray Round

The Centre, following Supreme Court directives, reduced the NEET-SS qualifying percentile from 50% to 30% for 2025 admissions, triggering a stray round for 1,857 vacant super-speciality seats. The decision also partially restored Tamil Nadu's in-service quota, highlighting the persistent crisis of vacancies in high-stakes medical entrance exams and the judicial push for optimal resource utilization.

Polity Current Affairs

Election Commission's SIR Deletes 13 Crore Names from Draft Rolls; Raises Questions on Population & Voting Rights

The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has led to the deletion of 13 crore names from draft rolls, including nearly one-third of Delhi's electorate. This article by a former Chief Election Commissioner uses satire to highlight the absurdity of treating electoral roll deletions as a solution to India's population problem, while drawing parallels with the Assam NRC and warning of potential disenfranchisement of eligible citizens.

Polity Current Affairs

CBSE Mandates Three Languages Including Two Native Indian Languages for Class 9 from July 2026

The Centre informed the Supreme Court it is working on implementing the CBSE's three-language policy, making two native Indian languages compulsory for Class 9 from July 2026. The policy aligns with NEP 2020, but faces challenges over implementation timelines and infrastructure, with the SC seeking a balanced solution.

Police cannot investigate offences…, Current Affairs for Exams