In a landmark ruling, the Punjab & Haryana High Court awarded ₹60 lakh compensation to a man with 65% functional disability from a 2016 accident, clarifying that mere resumption of employment does not equate to restoration of pre-accident earning capacity. This case underscores critical legal principles for personal injury claims and compensation assessment.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Compensation Awarded: ₹60 Lakh
- ›Functional Disability: 65%
- ›Target this Data: ₹60 lakh compensation for 65% functional disability.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Punjab and Haryana High Court (Appellate authority over MACTs).
- ›Target this Legal Point: Distinction between 'resumption of employment' and 'restoration of earning capacity' under Motor Vehicles Act.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.