PolitySocial Justice
News 0 of 32

Rajasthan HC Orders 3% Marks Weightage for Transgender Candidates, Strikes Down OBC Categorization

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link
03 Apr 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:3% additional weightageDate: 30.03.2026
Bodies:Rajasthan High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Rajasthan HC modifies its judgment to remove remarks criticizing the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, which replaces self-perceived identity with medical certification.

2.The court, in a petition by Ganga Kumari, struck down the state's notification placing all transgender persons in the OBC category, calling it discriminatory against SC/ST transgender individuals.

3.It directed the state government to grant a 3% additional weightage in marks for transgender candidates across all reservation categories in public employment and educational institutions.

The Big Picture
Prelims · MediumMains · High

The Rajasthan High Court has revised a landmark judgment on transgender rights, deleting critical observations about the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026. While affirming the constitutional right to self-identify gender, the court directed the state to grant a 3% additional marks weightage to transgender candidates in public employment and education until a comprehensive reservation policy is framed.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Judgment Date30 March 2026
Additional Weightage Ordered3% marks
Bench CompositionJustices Arung Monga and Yogendra Kumar Purohit
PetitionerGanga Kumari

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Judgment Date: 30 March 2026
  • ›Additional Weightage Ordered: 3% marks
  • ›Target this Data: 3% additional marks weightage ordered by Rajasthan HC.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Rajasthan High Court (Bench: Justices Arung Monga & Yogendra Kumar Purohit).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Articles 14, 15, 16, and 21 as the constitutional basis for self-identified gender identity.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which High Court delivered the judgment revising its remarks on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Rajasthan High Court judgment:

1. The court struck down a state notification that placed all transgender persons in the OBC category.

2. The court, in its revised order, retained its criticism that the 2026 Amendment Act dilutes constitutional guarantees.

3. The court directed the state to grant a 3% reservation quota for transgender candidates in public employment.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What interim relief did the Rajasthan High Court direct for transgender candidates in public employment and education?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary reason the Rajasthan High Court gave for striking down the state's notification placing all transgender persons in the OBC category?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC on Article 17: Purification Ritual After Dalit Use Raises Untouchability Question

A purification ritual at Haldwani after Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge's rally has reignited the legal debate on untouchability. The Supreme Court's 2024 ruling in Sukanya Shantha case links Article 17 to caste-based notions of 'purity and pollution', extending its reach beyond denial of entry to discriminatory acts based on touch or presence.

Polity Current Affairs

Calcutta HC Orders 5 Fast-Track Courts for NEET Paper Leak Cases Under 2024 Act

The Calcutta High Court has ordered five dedicated fast-track courts—three in Kolkata and two in Port Blair—to exclusively try NEET paper leak cases under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, with a strict deadline to conclude trial within three months from filing of charge-sheet. This move aims to expedite justice in one of India's biggest education scandals and follows nationwide protests and the resignation of the Union Education Minister.

Polity Current Affairs

MahaRERA Strikes Down Builder's Unilateral Cancellation Clause, Orders Interest from Oct 2023 Under RERA Act

MahaRERA has declared illegal a contractual clause that allowed a builder to unilaterally cancel a flat allotment via Power of Attorney, reinforcing statutory safeguards under the RERA Act. The developer was ordered to pay interest for delayed possession from October 1, 2023. This ruling is a key example of regulatory protection for homebuyers and a must-know for exams covering RERA, consumer rights, and state-level governance.

Polity Current Affairs

BCI Orders Physical Inspection of All Law Colleges within 6 Weeks, Bans Weekend/Shift Classes After AP HC Verdict

The Bar Council of India has issued a circular (Aug 4, 2026) mandating all universities to physically inspect affiliated law colleges within six weeks and ban weekend/evening/shift-based programmes. This follows an Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment emphasizing universities' continuing duty to ensure compliance with minimum legal education standards. For exam aspirants, this is a key regulatory update linking BCI powers, legal education rules, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Bombay HC Orders Reimbursement to 4 NEET Toppers Denied Govt Seats Due to EWS, Maratha Quotas

The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to reimburse fees of four medical students who were denied government college seats despite higher NEET scores, due to the application of EWS and Maratha quotas. The court criticized the 'non-transparent' implementation of the state's reimbursement scheme and upheld the primacy of merit. This judgment is significant for understanding the judicial scrutiny of reservation policies and the principle of merit in public admissions.

Polity Current Affairs

SC's March 11 Creamy Layer Judgment: Centre Seeks Clarification for 100 OBC CSE-2025 Candidates

Centre has approached SC seeking clarification on its March 11 judgment that ruled income cannot be the sole criterion for creamy layer among OBCs. The plea concerns 100 candidates selected in CSE since 2016 but rejected due to creamy layer criteria. The government warns retrospective application could disrupt CSE-2025 training and allocation.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Directs Formulation of SOP for Arresting Transgender Persons; NHRC Advisory 2.0 Referred

The Delhi High Court has directed the Centre and Delhi Police to formulate a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the arrest, detention, search, and interrogation of transgender persons, citing a critical legal vacuum. The court relied on the NHRC's 'Advisory for Ensuring the Welfare of Transgender Persons, 2.0' issued in May 2026, and highlighted a specific incident of rights violation. This is a key development for Polity & Social Justice syllabus, focusing on fundamental rights (Article 21), the Transgender Persons Act, and the role of NHRC.