PolitySocial Justice
News 16 of 39

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Plea Challenging Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act, 1937 Inheritance Rules as Discriminatory

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
16 Apr 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937
Bodies:Supreme Court of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court, led by CJI Surya Kant, issued notice to the Union Government on a plea challenging inheritance rules under the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 as discriminatory to women.

2.The petition, filed by Poulomi Pavini Shukla and argued by advocates Prashant Bhushan and Nihal Ahmed, argues that Shariat rules on inheritance and testamentary succession are not 'essential religious practices'.

3.The case highlights the constitutional conflict between the right to equality (Article 14) and the protection of religious personal laws, a recurring theme in UPSC GS Paper 2 (Polity) and Essay papers.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has taken up a significant constitutional challenge against gender discrimination in Muslim personal law. The Court has sought the Union government's response on whether inheritance rules under the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, are discriminatory and whether they constitute an 'essential religious practice'.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bench HeadChief Justice of India Surya Kant
PetitionerPoulomi Pavini Shukla
AdvocatesPrashant Bhushan & Nihal Ahmed
Act ChallengedMuslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937
Core ArgumentInheritance rules are not 'essential religious practice'

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bench Head: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant
  • ›Petitioner: Poulomi Pavini Shukla
  • ›Target this Data: Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (Bench headed by CJI Surya Kant)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: 'Essential Religious Practice' Doctrine (from Shirur Mutt case)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The Supreme Court notice in the news was issued by a Bench headed by which constitutional authority?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the news article:

1. The Supreme Court issued notice to the Union government on a plea concerning inheritance rules.

2. The petition challenges provisions of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.

3. The petitioners argue that the challenged provisions constitute an 'essential religious practice'.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

Which specific Act of Parliament is being challenged in the plea discussed in the news article?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional principle invoked by the petitioners to challenge the inheritance rules under Muslim personal law?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules 1978 'Industry' Definition Not Binding on Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Supreme Court's nine-judge Constitution Bench ruled that the 1978 landmark precedent defining 'industry' will not automatically apply to the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This severs the worker-friendly expansive interpretation, creating a clean slate for future labour disputes under the new code.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Expands to 38 Judges: Diversity Deficit Exposed as Women Only 4.15%

Parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, adding 4 judges to the apex court (strength now 38). However, the article underscores a glaring lack of diversity: women constitute only 4.15% of all SC judges ever appointed, and caste representation in High Courts remains abysmally low. For exam aspirants, this links directly to the collegium system, judicial appointments, social justice, and pendency crisis.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC 9-Judge Bench Rules BWSSB Triple Test Not Binding for IRC 2020 Section 2(p)

The Supreme Court's 9-judge bench has held that the landmark 1978 'Triple Test' for defining 'industry' under the ID Act will not be a binding precedent for interpreting the identical provision in the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This could weaken worker protections just as more workers move to the private sector post-liberalisation.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC Rules Child Can Claim Reservation Through Mother, Rejects Patrilineal Caste Tracing

The Madras High Court has ruled that a child can claim Scheduled Caste (SC), Most Backward Class (MBC), or Other Backward Class (OBC) reservation benefits through their mother's nativity if the child is born and brought up in that community, rejecting the 'patriarchal society' argument. This landmark judgment links the core of reservation to social disadvantage, not lineage, and has direct implications for the interpretation of equality under Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Constitution.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules Police Cannot Independently Investigate Sex Determination Cases Under PC&PNDT Act

The Supreme Court has ruled that police cannot independently investigate offences under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994. Only the Appropriate Authority, a specialised body under the Act, can investigate. Police may assist but cannot take over the investigation, and any separate criminal offences (IPC/BNS) can be investigated independently. This clarifies a long-standing legal confusion and is crucial for understanding the enforcement mechanism of this social legislation.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Exempting Current Class 6 from Three-Language Policy; Centre Seeks More Time

The Supreme Court has proposed exempting the current Class 6 batch from the mandatory three-language policy, suggesting implementation from January 1, 2027. The Centre has sought more time to decide, while the court has asked for details on teacher availability and infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

SC's 76-Year Journey: Reforms at Magistracy Level Needed for Judicial Overhaul

A former Delhi High Court judge critiques the Indian judiciary's performance over 76 years, highlighting issues like eviction of poor without rehabilitation, failure to curb extra-legal punishments, and delay in upholding progressive judgments. The article argues that meaningful judicial reform must begin at the magisterial level, focusing on mentoring, mental health support, and performance evaluation reforms.