The Supreme Court ruled that a conclusive DNA test disproving paternity overrides the legal presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, absolving the man from child maintenance. Crucially, the Court balanced this by directing state child welfare authorities to assess and ensure the child's well-being, highlighting the judiciary's role in reconciling scientific truth with social protection.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Section of Law: Section 112, Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- ›Bench: Justices Sanjay Karol & Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh
- ›Target this Legal Point: Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - the presumption of legitimacy.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Department of Women and Child Development, Government of NCT of Delhi - tasked with child welfare intervention.
- ›Target this Judicial Principle: Scientific proof (DNA test) prevails over legal presumption when in conflict.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.