The Supreme Court has questioned the rationale of extending reservation benefits to children of affluent families within backward classes, highlighting the creamy layer concept. This case, involving a Karnataka petitioner whose parents' combined income exceeded ₹8 lakh, touches upon the core constitutional debate of balancing social mobility with equitable affirmative action.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›SC Bench: Justices B.V. Nagarathna & Ujjal Bhuyan
- ›Creamy Layer Income Threshold: ₹8,00,000 (mentioned in case)
- ›Target this Data: ₹8,00,000 income threshold for creamy layer in Karnataka case
- ›Target this Nodal Body: District Caste and Income Verification Committee (State-level)
- ›Target this Legal Point: Indra Sawhney case (1992) as the origin of creamy layer concept for OBCs
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.