SC Reaffirms 'Sampradaya' Test for Temple Entry, Clarifies 2018 Sabarimala Judgment

SC Retains 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Entry, Allows Transition Window Till March 2027

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory three-year practice requirement for judicial service entry but created a two-year transition window (May 20, 2025 to March 31, 2027) allowing fresh law graduates to apply. Selected candidates must undergo one year of training at State Judicial Academies plus one year of law clerkship before regular appointment, effectively substituting the practice period with structured training.

SC's March 11 Creamy Layer Judgment: Centre Seeks Clarification for 100 OBC CSE-2025 Candidates

Centre has approached SC seeking clarification on its March 11 judgment that ruled income cannot be the sole criterion for creamy layer among OBCs. The plea concerns 100 candidates selected in CSE since 2016 but rejected due to creamy layer criteria. The government warns retrospective application could disrupt CSE-2025 training and allocation.

SC Clarifies BNSS Section 187(2): Police Custody Available in Parts Up to 15 Days in 40/60 Days

The Supreme Court in State of Andhra Pradesh vs Suda Suresh Veera Venkata Naga Raju held that Section 187(2) BNSS allows police custody to be granted in parts, not exceeding 15 days in aggregate, during the first 40 or 60 days of detention. It also clarified that Section 38 BNSS does not entitle an accused to continuous physical presence of a lawyer throughout interrogation. This judgment expands investigative flexibility under the new criminal procedure code.

SC Rules BCI Cannot Discipline Law Students; Landmark Judgment Limits Regulatory Overreach

The Supreme Court ruled that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has no power to take disciplinary action against law students, clarifying the limits of BCI's regulatory authority under the Advocates Act, 1961. This landmark judgment draws a boundary in the six-decade-long conflict between the BCI and law students over issues ranging from attendance mandates to the All India Bar Examination.

Supreme Court Landmark Judgment on Sex Work: Article 142, Consent, and Rights Framework

The Supreme Court in May 2026 delivered a landmark judgment on sex work, holding that consenting adult sex workers cannot be forcibly rescued and affirming their constitutional rights despite social disapproval. The judgment invokes Article 142 for legal force, spans nearly 300 pages, and departs from global anti-trafficking assumptions, but raises concerns about institutional implementation and caste discrimination.

SC Reaffirms Article 22(1): Non-Negotiable Right to Grounds of Arrest, Compensation for Violation

The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that Article 22(1) of the Constitution is a non-negotiable fundamental right requiring that an arrested person be informed of the grounds of arrest in writing and in a language they understand. Any violation leads to immediate release, compensation, and strict accountability for the arresting officer. This ruling applies to all offences, including those under the BNS and special enactments.

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

ECI SIR Process: 93% Inclusion Rate in WB Appeals; SC Hearing on Voter Deletions in Delhi & WB

The ECI's SIR process has led to massive disenfranchisement in West Bengal and Delhi. With only 3.2% of appeals disposed and 93% of those restored, the process is deeply flawed. The Supreme Court is hearing petitions; this has major implications for electoral integrity and universal adult franchise.