What is the common examiner trap about Polity in UPSC exams?

Examiners may ask about the constitutional article under which the Supreme Court intervened (Article 32/136) or swap the rank of the mandated woman officer (e.g., 'DSP' instead of 'CP/IG'). They may also create a distractor about who constitutes an SIT (state government vs. Supreme Court).

PolityGovernance

Take AI Challenge ▸

News 21 of 24

SC Directs UP DGP to Form SIT for Ghaziabad Minor Rape-Murder; Mandates 2-Week Probe and Private Hospital Negligence Inquiry

Q: Under which article of the Constitution can the Supreme Court directly intervene to protect fundamental rights, as seen in its order for an SIT?

Article 32, Article 32 grants the right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights (like Article 21 - Right to Life). The Court's intervention in this case, citing its conscience being shocked, falls under this power. Article 226 is for High Courts, Article 142 deals with enforcement of decrees, and Article 136 deals with special leave to appeal.

Q: Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's order in the Ghaziabad minor rape-murder case: 1. The SIT was directed to be constituted by the Ghaziabad Police Commissioner. 2. The Court mandated that the SIT include a woman officer of the rank of Commissioner of Police or Inspector General. 3. The SIT was asked to investigate the alleged negligence of private hospitals in not admitting the victim. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Both 2 and 3, Statement 1 is incorrect. The Supreme Court ordered the Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP), not the Ghaziabad Police Commissioner, to constitute the SIT. Statement 2 is correct as per the article. Statement 3 is also correct as the Court specifically asked the SIT to 'investigate the role of private hospitals'.

Q: Within what timeframe did the Supreme Court direct the newly formed SIT to conclude its investigation into the Ghaziabad case?

Within two weeks, The article explicitly states: 'The SIT was also asked to conclude the investigation as early as possible, preferably within two weeks.' The other options are plausible but incorrect timeframes.

Q: What was a significant additional mandate given to the SIT, beyond investigating the primary crime?

To investigate alleged negligence by private hospitals, The Supreme Court specifically directed the SIT to 'look into all the grievances... especially... to investigate the role of private hospitals' which had been accused of negligence. This expands the scope of the investigation to include accountability of healthcare providers, a critical issue of public importance.

Q: What should UPSC aspirants remember about Polity for Prelims?

1. Target this Data: The Supreme Court bench comprised CJI Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi, and Vipul M. Pancholi. 2. Target this Nodal Body: The Supreme Court ordered the Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP) to form the SIT. 3. Target this Legal Point: The victim's father was taken to record his statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

Polity Social IssuesSUPPORT

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link

24 Apr 2026

~2 min

Source: Indian Express

Key Data:March 164-year-oldwithin two weeks

Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaUttar Pradesh Police

Practice MCQs from today's news ▸

~2 min · Quick mode

What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court has ordered the Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP) to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the alleged rape and murder of a four-year-old girl in Ghaziabad.

2.The bench, led by CJI Surya Kant, specified that the SIT must include senior women police officers from the UP cadre but 'not having roots in the state', and directed it to conclude its investigation within two weeks.

3.Beyond the primary crime, the SIT is tasked with investigating the alleged negligence of private hospitals that refused to admit the critically injured child, a key angle for exams on public health accountability and criminal procedure.

The Big Picture

Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court has intervened in a high-profile case of alleged rape and murder of a minor in Ghaziabad, ordering the UP DGP to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT). The court mandated the SIT to include senior women officers from outside the state and to also investigate allegations of negligence by private hospitals that refused admission to the victim. This case highlights judicial oversight in criminal investigations and the accountability of private healthcare providers in emergencies.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bench CompositionCJI Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi & Vipul M Pancholi

SIT Investigation DeadlineWithin two weeks

Incident DateMarch 16

Victim's Age4 years old

1-Minute Revision

›Bench Composition: CJI Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi & Vipul M Pancholi
›SIT Investigation Deadline: Within two weeks
›Target this Data: The Supreme Court bench comprised CJI Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi, and Vipul M. Pancholi.
›Target this Nodal Body: The Supreme Court ordered the Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP) to form the SIT.
›Target this Legal Point: The victim's father was taken to record his statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

News Snapshot

⚖️

Judicial Intervention

The Supreme Court used its extraordinary powers to order the formation of an SIT, citing that the case facts 'shocked its conscience'.

🕵️

SIT Composition Mandate

The SIT must include a woman officer of CP/IG rank and a woman SP/Addl. SP from the UP cadre but without roots in the state, ensuring impartiality.

🏥

Hospital Negligence Probe

A critical ancillary directive is for the SIT to investigate the role of private hospitals accused of negligence for not admitting the victim.

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

This case falls under the broader issue of crimes against children and the efficacy of the criminal justice system. The Supreme Court's intervention reflects a pattern of judicial activism in cases involving heinous crimes and perceived lapses in investigation, especially when state agencies are involved. It underscores the court's role as a guardian of fundamental rights under Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).

Core Analysis & Implications

The order has multiple strategic dimensions. First, it reinforces the Supreme Court's power to monitor investigations under Article 32/136. Second, mandating officers 'not having roots in the state' is a procedural innovation aimed at ensuring an unbiased probe, a point examiners may highlight. Third, expanding the SIT's mandate to probe hospital negligence intertwines criminal law with public health accountability, a potential essay theme on state and private duty of care.

Future Outlook / Way Forward

The SIT's report, due within two weeks, will be crucial. Depending on its findings, the case could set precedents for: 1) SIT composition in sensitive cases, 2) legal consequences for hospitals refusing emergency care under laws like the Clinical Establishments Act, and 3) witness protection protocols. The trial court proceedings are currently in abeyance, awaiting this supplementary report.

Key Facts at a Glance

Bench CompositionCJI Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi & Vipul M Pancholi

SIT Investigation DeadlineWithin two weeks

Incident DateMarch 16

Victim's Age4 years old

You've read the full analysis. Now test your understanding.

Practice exam-style questions based on this article.

Q1Static LinkageEasyUPSC, SSC, State PSC

Under which article of the Constitution can the Supreme Court directly intervene to protect fundamental rights, as seen in its order for an SIT?

Q2Statement-basedHardUPSC, MPSC

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's order in the Ghaziabad minor rape-murder case:

1. The SIT was directed to be constituted by the Ghaziabad Police Commissioner.

2. The Court mandated that the SIT include a woman officer of the rank of Commissioner of Police or Inspector General.

3. The SIT was asked to investigate the alleged negligence of private hospitals in not admitting the victim.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMediumUPSC, SSC, State PSC

Within what timeframe did the Supreme Court direct the newly formed SIT to conclude its investigation into the Ghaziabad case?

Q4Application/ImpactMediumUPSC, State PSC

What was a significant additional mandate given to the SIT, beyond investigating the primary crime?

All 25 MCQs ▸

Read original article from Indian Express

You finished this topic

Practice 3 MCQs from this news Next Article

Explore Related Topics

PolityView Topic MCQs →Social IssuesView Topic MCQs →

PreviousJal Shakti Ministry CPSEs WAPCOS & NPCC refer corruption cases involving Rs 1.91 Cr loss and audio evidence to CBI Next MHA Grants FCRA Registration to American India Foundation Trust; 53 NGOs Approved in 2026 Amid New Amendment Bill

Related Current Affairs

Polity Current Affairs

SC Forms HPEC Led by Justice R Subhash Reddy to Probe Police Excesses During NEET Protests

The Supreme Court has constituted a High-Powered Enquiry Committee (HPEC), led by former SC judge Justice R Subhash Reddy, to investigate the alleged disproportionate use of force by police against protesters at Jantar Mantar and other locations during the NEET-UG paper leak protests. The panel will examine 12 critical issues including use of pellet guns, targeting of female protesters, and the misuse of legal provisions like Section 163 BNSS and Section 152 BNS.

Polity Current Affairs

CBSE Mandates Three Languages Including Two Native Indian Languages for Class 9 from July 2026

The Centre informed the Supreme Court it is working on implementing the CBSE's three-language policy, making two native Indian languages compulsory for Class 9 from July 2026. The policy aligns with NEP 2020, but faces challenges over implementation timelines and infrastructure, with the SC seeking a balanced solution.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs Uniform Policy for Demolition & Rehabilitation of Unauthorised Homes Under Article 21

The Supreme Court has ruled that the state's power to demolish unauthorised constructions must be balanced with the duty to rehabilitate affected families, invoking Article 21 (right to dignity, shelter, livelihood). The court directed the Union and State governments to consider formulating a uniform demolition and rehabilitation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Orders CBI Probe Into UP Police Encounter, Questions Police Narrative on Shooting

The Allahabad High Court has ordered a CBI probe into a police encounter in UP where a rape accused was shot in both legs, questioning the police's version of events. The court's strong observations about the pattern of police encounters and the rights of the accused make this a landmark judgment for police accountability and criminal justice reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Forms HPEC to Probe NEET-UG Protest Violence; Collectors in 8 States/UTs Empowered for CAA Citizenship

A day of major structural developments: The Supreme Court constituted a high-powered committee (HPEC) to investigate police violence during NEET-UG protests, while the MHA empowered District Collectors in 8 States/UTs to process CAA citizenship applications, bypassing earlier multi-agency committees. Additionally, a 9-judge SC bench overruled the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply judgment on 'industry' definition under the new labour codes, fundamentally altering worker rights.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Exempting Current Class 6 from Three-Language Policy; Centre Seeks More Time

The Supreme Court has proposed exempting the current Class 6 batch from the mandatory three-language policy, suggesting implementation from January 1, 2027. The Centre has sought more time to decide, while the court has asked for details on teacher availability and infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

SC's 76-Year Journey: Reforms at Magistracy Level Needed for Judicial Overhaul

A former Delhi High Court judge critiques the Indian judiciary's performance over 76 years, highlighting issues like eviction of poor without rehabilitation, failure to curb extra-legal punishments, and delay in upholding progressive judgments. The article argues that meaningful judicial reform must begin at the magisterial level, focusing on mentoring, mental health support, and performance evaluation reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Replies on NRC ID Cards: 3.11 Crore Await Documents, 19 Lakh Excluded

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre and Assam government to respond to pleas seeking issuance of identity cards to 3.11 crore people included in the National Register of Citizens (NRC) 2019, while another 19 lakh excluded persons await the appeal process. This case is critical for exam aspirants as it tests knowledge of the Citizenship Act, NRC process, and Assam Accord provisions.

Start Today's Quiz(25 Qs)

Take Today's Quiz

25 Qs • 5-7 Mins

SC Directs UP DGP to Form SIT for Ghaziabad Minor Rape-Murder; Mandates 2-Week Probe and Private Hospital Negligence Inquiry

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

1-Minute Revision

News Snapshot

Judicial Intervention

SIT Composition Mandate

Hospital Negligence Probe

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

Core Analysis & Implications

Future Outlook / Way Forward

Prelims Flashpoints

Key Facts at a Glance