What is the common examiner trap about Polity in UPSC exams?

They may ask about the specific article under which the Supreme Court derives its contempt powers (Article 129) vs. the article for High Courts (Article 215). Another trap is confusing NCERT with SCERT (State Councils). They may also ask about the nature of the SC order - 'withdrawal and ban' vs. 'review and amend'.

What should UPSC aspirants remember about Polity for Prelims?

1. Target this Data: Class 8 Social Science textbook chapter titled 'The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society'. 2. Target this Nodal Body: NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) and Department of School Education and Literacy. 3. Target this Legal Point: Supreme Court's suo motu contempt powers under Article 129 of the Constitution.

PolityJudiciary

Take AI Challenge ▸

News 0 of 28

SC Suo Motu Contempt Notice to NCERT Over Class 8 Textbook Criticism of Judicial Backlog and Corruption

Q: Which organization is primarily responsible for preparing the curriculum and textbooks for Classes 1 to 12, as mentioned in the article?

National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), The article explicitly states NCERT's primary function is to prepare the curriculum for students of Classes 1 to 12. While CBSE is an examination body and the Ministry of Education is the policymaker, NCERT is the autonomous organization tasked with curriculum and textbook development.

Q: Consider the following statements regarding the controversy mentioned in the article: 1. The Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of a chapter in a Class 8 Social Science textbook. 2. The chapter was criticized for highlighting only the positive contributions of the Indian judiciary. 3. The Court issued contempt notices to the Director of NCERT and the Secretary of the Department of School Education and Literacy. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Both 1 and 3, Statement 1 is correct: The SC bench headed by the CJI took suo motu cognisance of the textbook chapter. Statement 2 is incorrect: The article states the chapter was criticized for painting the judiciary in 'black hues' and ignoring its positive contributions, meaning it highlighted negatives, not positives. Statement 3 is correct: The bench issued contempt notices to the NCERT Director and the Education Secretary.

Q: As per the article, which landmark Supreme Court judgment is credited with establishing that Parliament cannot alter the Constitution's foundational features?

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), The article specifically mentions the Kesavananda Bharati case as the judgment which held that Parliament cannot alter or destroy the Constitution's foundational features like democracy, secularism, federalism, and the rule of law. This is the famous 'Basic Structure Doctrine' case.

Q: What is the primary constitutional tension highlighted by the Supreme Court's action against NCERT in the article?

The tension between freedom of speech/academic inquiry (Article 19) and the need to protect the authority of constitutional institutions., The core debate revolves around whether NCERT's textbook content, as part of academic freedom and free speech, can critically examine the judiciary, versus the Supreme Court's duty and power to protect its own institutional integrity and authority from what it perceives as defamation. The article cites Lord Atkin on justice being subject to scrutiny, counterposed against the SC's view that criticism must be objective and not tarnish the institution.

PolityHIGH

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link

18 Mar 2026

~2 min

Source: Indian Express

Bodies:Supreme CourtNCERTDepartment of School Education and Literacy

Practice MCQs from today's news ▸

~2 min · Quick mode

What This Article Covers

1.SC bench headed by CJI took suo motu cognisance of NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbook chapter 'The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society'.

2.The Court directed NCERT to withdraw all copies, banned further publication, and issued contempt notices to NCERT Director and Education Secretary.

3.The controversy pivots on whether NCERT overstepped by presenting a one-sided negative view of the judiciary or if the SC's reaction constitutes judicial overreach.

The Big Picture

Prelims · MediumMains · High

The Supreme Court has initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against NCERT for a Class 8 textbook chapter criticizing judicial corruption and case backlog. This case raises fundamental questions about academic freedom, judicial accountability, and the separation of powers between education and judiciary.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Contempt Notice Issued ToNCERT Director and Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy

Affected TextbookClass 8 Social Science

Key SC Judgment CitedKesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

Landmark SC Failure CitedADM Jabalpur (Habeas Corpus case during Emergency)

1-Minute Revision

›Contempt Notice Issued To: NCERT Director and Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy
›Affected Textbook: Class 8 Social Science
›Target this Data: Class 8 Social Science textbook chapter titled 'The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society'.
›Target this Nodal Body: NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) and Department of School Education and Literacy.
›Target this Legal Point: Supreme Court's suo motu contempt powers under Article 129 of the Constitution.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

News Snapshot

⚖️

Judicial Contempt Power

The Supreme Court used its suo motu powers to initiate contempt proceedings against NCERT for textbook content it deemed defamatory.

📚

Academic Freedom vs. Institutional Integrity

NCERT's role as a curriculum framer clashed with the judiciary's perception of its own institutional integrity being undermined.

🔍

Holistic Education Debate

The case questions whether educational material should present a balanced view of institutions or can focus on critical aspects.

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

The controversy stems from NCERT's constitutional mandate under the National Curriculum Framework to prepare objective educational material. The judiciary, as per Lord Atkin's quote cited, is subject to public scrutiny. However, the Indian Supreme Court has historically guarded its reputation fiercely, balancing criticism with contempt powers under Article 129 of the Constitution.

Core Analysis & Implications

This incident highlights a tension between two constitutional values: freedom of expression/academic inquiry (Article 19) and the need to protect the authority of constitutional institutions. The SC's drastic order (withdrawal and ban) preempts any procedural review, raising concerns about judicial overreach. Conversely, NCERT's alleged one-sided portrayal ignoring landmark judgments like Kesavananda Bharati and PIL innovations fails its pedagogical duty. The case tests the limits of 'fair criticism' versus 'scurrilous attack' on the judiciary.

Future Outlook / Way Forward

The outcome will set a precedent for future educational content regarding governance institutions. It may lead to formal guidelines on how sensitive topics about constitutional bodies are taught in schools. The broader issue of judicial backlog and corruption, acknowledged even by the article, remains unaddressed, pointing to a need for institutional introspection alongside protecting institutional dignity.

Key Facts at a Glance

Contempt Notice Issued ToNCERT Director and Secretary, Department of School Education and Literacy

Affected TextbookClass 8 Social Science

Key SC Judgment CitedKesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

Landmark SC Failure CitedADM Jabalpur (Habeas Corpus case during Emergency)

You've read the full analysis. Now test your understanding.

Practice exam-style questions based on this article.

Q1Static LinkageEasyUPSC, SSC, Teaching

Which organization is primarily responsible for preparing the curriculum and textbooks for Classes 1 to 12, as mentioned in the article?

Q2Statement-basedMediumUPSC, SSC

Consider the following statements regarding the controversy mentioned in the article:

1. The Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of a chapter in a Class 8 Social Science textbook.

2. The chapter was criticized for highlighting only the positive contributions of the Indian judiciary.

3. The Court issued contempt notices to the Director of NCERT and the Secretary of the Department of School Education and Literacy.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMediumUPSC, SSC, State PSC

As per the article, which landmark Supreme Court judgment is credited with establishing that Parliament cannot alter the Constitution's foundational features?

Q4Application/ImpactHardUPSC, State PSC

What is the primary constitutional tension highlighted by the Supreme Court's action against NCERT in the article?

All 25 MCQs ▸

Read original article from Indian Express

You finished this topic

Practice 3 MCQs from this news Next Article

Explore Related Topics

PolityView Topic MCQs →

Next Gujarat Introduces Uniform Civil Code Bill 2026, Exempts Scheduled Tribes, Sets Marriage Age at 21/18

Related Current Affairs

Polity Current Affairs

CBSE 3-Language Policy: SC Informed of Implementation Plan for Class 9 Students

The Supreme Court is reviewing the CBSE's new policy making three languages, including at least two Indian languages, compulsory for Class 9 students. The Centre has informed the court it is working on an implementation plan, addressing concerns about student pressure and infrastructure. This is a key test of the National Education Policy 2020's implementation in schools.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Flags CBSE Three-Language Policy for Class 9 from July 2026, Cites Student Pressure & Teacher Shortage

The Supreme Court has raised concerns over the CBSE's three-language policy for Class 9 students, emphasizing the need to avoid burdening children. The Court questioned the implementation timeline, teacher availability, and the starting class, suggesting an expert committee to address issues. The policy aligns with NEP 2020.

Polity Current Affairs

NCERT Reconstitutes Class 11-12 Political Science Textbook Team with Focus on Indian Knowledge Systems and Cultural Rootedness

NCERT has reconstituted the textbook development team for Class 11 and 12 Political Science with a mandate to integrate Indian knowledge systems, cultural rootedness, and inclusion. The move signals a shift in curriculum orientation, with several members having RSS/ABVP links, making it a high-relevance topic for UPSC and other exams focusing on education policy and ideological debates.

Health & Education Current Affairs

CBSE Mandates Two Bhartiya Bhashas Under NEP 2020 Three-Language Formula from Class 6 (2026-27)

CBSE schools from the 2026-27 academic session must offer two Indian languages (Bhartiya Bhashas) as R2 and R3 under NEP 2020's three-language formula. However, practical roadblocks like teacher shortages, limited language options, and transition issues for existing students threaten effective implementation, with Hindi and Sanskrit becoming default third languages.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Issues Notice on BCI's Conflict of Interest in Regulating and Owning Law Universities

The Supreme Court has questioned the Bar Council of India's authority to regulate legal education, noting that the BCI is a regulator of the legal profession, not an expert in legal education. The Court issued notice on a petition alleging conflict of interest as BCI owns law universities through its trust.

Health & Education Current Affairs

NCERT Granted Deemed University Status Under UGC Act 1956; Conditions Include NIRF, NAAC Compliance

The Ministry of Education has confirmed NCERT's deemed university status, expanding its role beyond school education into research and doctoral programmes. This move, approved under UGC Act 1956, comes with conditions mandating compliance with UGC norms, NIRF rankings, and NAAC accreditation, raising concerns about academic autonomy.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Retains 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Entry, Allows Transition Window Till March 2027

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory three-year practice requirement for judicial service entry but created a two-year transition window (May 20, 2025 to March 31, 2027) allowing fresh law graduates to apply. Selected candidates must undergo one year of training at State Judicial Academies plus one year of law clerkship before regular appointment, effectively substituting the practice period with structured training.

Polity Current Affairs

CVC Report: 7,229 CBI Corruption Cases Pending Trial, 409 Over 20 Years

The CVC's annual report reveals a massive backlog of corruption cases investigated by the CBI, with over 7,200 pending trials and 14,083 appeals/revisions pending in higher courts. This highlights systemic delays in the criminal justice system and raises governance concerns that are highly relevant for civil services and judiciary exams.

Start Today's Quiz(25 Qs)

Take Today's Quiz

25 Qs • 5-7 Mins

SC Suo Motu Contempt Notice to NCERT Over Class 8 Textbook Criticism of Judicial Backlog and Corruption

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

1-Minute Revision

News Snapshot

Judicial Contempt Power

Academic Freedom vs. Institutional Integrity

Holistic Education Debate

Detailed Analysis & Strategic Depth

Context / Background

Core Analysis & Implications

Future Outlook / Way Forward

Prelims Flashpoints

Key Facts at a Glance