The Allahabad High Court ruled that merely referring to a person by their profession (e.g., 'dhobin') does not automatically constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act. The court held that the prosecution must prove the words were used with the deliberate intent to humiliate the victim because of their SC/ST identity, establishing a crucial legal test for such cases.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Court & Judge: Allahabad High Court, Justice Anil Kumar-X
- ›Key Legal Provision: SC/ST (PoA) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)
- ›Target this Legal Point: SC/ST Act offence requires proven 'intent to humiliate' based on caste, not just use of occupational term.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Special Courts under the SC/ST Act handle such cases.
- ›Target this Procedural Point: Converting a protest petition into a complaint inherently implies court's disagreement with police report under CrPC 173(2).
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.