PolityGovernance
News 21 of 22

Calcutta HC Designates 5 Fast-Track Courts for Paper Leak Cases Under Public Examinations Act 2024

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
30 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:5 fast-track courts3 monthsPublic Examinations Act 2024Lok Sabha passed amendment July 30, 2026
Bodies:Calcutta High CourtLok SabhaRajya SabhaPresident of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Calcutta HC designated 5 fast-track courts (3 in Kolkata, 2 in Port Blair) for exam paper leak cases.

2.Trials must be completed within 3 months of chargesheet filing under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act 2024.

3.The move follows NEET paper leak scandal, student protests, and resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

Calcutta High Court designates 5 fast-track courts under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act 2024 to try paper leak cases within 3 months of chargesheet filing. This follows the NEET paper leak controversy and signals a crackdown on exam malpractices.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Fast-track courts designated5 (3 Kolkata, 2 Port Blair)
Trial completion deadline3 months from chargesheet
Governing ActPublic Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act 2024
Amendment statusPassed by Lok Sabha on July 30, 2026

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Fast-track courts designated: 5 (3 Kolkata, 2 Port Blair)
  • ›Trial completion deadline: 3 months from chargesheet
  • ›Target this Data: 5 fast-track courts (3 in Kolkata, 2 in Port Blair)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Calcutta High Court
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act 2024

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which High Court has jurisdiction over the Andaman and Nicobar Islands?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the fast-track courts designated by Calcutta HC:

1. Three fast-track courts are designated in Kolkata and two in Port Blair.

2. The fast-track courts can take up to six months to deliver verdicts after chargesheet.

3. Any appeal against a fast-track magistrate court order must be made to the corresponding fast-track sessions courts.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

How many fast-track courts were designated by the Calcutta High Court for paper leak cases?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary objective of designating fast-track courts for exam paper leak cases?

All 20 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Calcutta HC Orders 5 Fast-Track Courts for NEET Paper Leak Cases Under 2024 Act

The Calcutta High Court has ordered five dedicated fast-track courts—three in Kolkata and two in Port Blair—to exclusively try NEET paper leak cases under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, with a strict deadline to conclude trial within three months from filing of charge-sheet. This move aims to expedite justice in one of India's biggest education scandals and follows nationwide protests and the resignation of the Union Education Minister.

Polity Current Affairs

President Murmu Assents to Anti-Paper Leak Bill: 5-10 Years Jail, ₹50 Lakh Fine, Fast-Track Courts

President Droupadi Murmu has given assent to the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, introducing stricter punishments (5-10 years jail, fines up to ₹50 lakh for individuals, ₹10 crore for organized crime) and mandatory fast-track courts for trials within 3 months. This comes after NEET 2026 paper leak protests.

Polity Current Affairs

Indian Statistical Institute Bill 2026: Governance Reforms, Board Changes, Autonomy Concerns

The Indian Statistical Institute Bill, 2026, introduced in Lok Sabha, proposes sweeping governance changes to ISI, including a new Board of Governance and enhanced central control. Students and faculty protest the Bill citing loss of autonomy and insufficient consultations. For exam aspirants, this is a key case study of institutional governance reform vs. autonomy debates.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Calcutta HC Cancels OBC-A and OBC-B Certificates Issued Under 2025 TMC Rules

The Calcutta High Court has cancelled all OBC certificates issued under the OBC-A and OBC-B categories created by the previous TMC government in 2025. This landmark ruling affects thousands of certificate holders who will now be treated as general category candidates, directly impacting reservation policies and state-level classification powers.

Polity Current Affairs

Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill 2026: Judicial Magistrate Mandated for Delays Over 2 Years

The Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Bill 2026, passed in Lok Sabha, tightens verification norms: delays beyond two years now require a judicial magistrate's order instead of an executive magistrate. This amendment aims to curb fraudulent birth certificates, which have become near-conclusive proof for Aadhaar, passports, voter IDs, and school admissions. The bill raises concerns over accessibility for legitimate citizens, especially in remote areas.

Polity Current Affairs

2026 Amendment Penalises Disruption of Vande Mataram Singing (Up to 3 Years Jail); Bijoe Emmanuel Case Protects Silent Dissent

The 2026 amendment to the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act gives Vande Mataram the same criminal protection as the national anthem, but it does not compel singing. The Supreme Court's Bijoe Emmanuel ruling protects the right to remain silent if participation conflicts with conscience. This has implications for freedom of religion (Articles 25-26) and freedom of speech (Article 19(1)(a)).

Polity Current Affairs

Calcutta HC Rules Electricity Essential for Dignified Life, Restores Power in Disputed Property

Calcutta High Court held that electricity is essential for 'meaningful civilized living' under Article 21. It restored power to occupants of a disputed property but clarified that restoration does not create any right to stay or equity in their favour.

5 fast-track courts to try paper…, Current Affairs for Exams