Supreme Court has sought a response from the Centre on a plea seeking a ban on pellet guns for crowd dispersal, citing severe injuries to civilians. The Court has directed preservation of ammunition logs of RAF personnel deployed at Jantar Mantar protests, linking the issue to constitutional tests of necessity, proportionality, and reasonableness.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Case Type: Plea for ban on pellet guns for crowd dispersal
- ›Key Petitioner: Ex-IPS officer Yashovardhan Azad
- ›Target this Data: 20 July 2026 (date of pellet gun firing incident at Jantar Mantar/Sansad Chalo march)
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Rapid Action Force (RAF) of CRPF (personnel deployed)
- ›Target this Legal Point: Constitutional tests of 'necessity, proportionality, and reasonableness' under Article 19 and 21
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.