PolityGovernance
News 7 of 22

Allahabad HC Split Verdict: Two-Year Bar on Demolition After FIR Proposed

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
20 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Two-year bar on demolition after FIRIndia rank 91/182 in CPI 2025Article 226
Bodies:Allahabad High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Allahabad High Court split verdict on a petition against demolition of a home after an FIR in Uttar Pradesh.

2.Justice Atul Sreedharan proposed a two-year ban on demolitions after an FIR; Justice Siddharth Nandan disagreed.

3.Both judges agreed that demolitions must comply with due process and that the rights of the 'little man' must be protected.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Allahabad High Court delivered a split verdict on a petition against the demolition of a home following an FIR. Justice Atul Sreedharan proposed a two-year hiatus on demolitions after an FIR, while Justice Siddharth Nandan disagreed, raising critical questions about due process, property rights, and the limits of judicial power under Article 226.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtAllahabad High Court
Case TypeSplit Verdict on Demolition
Key ProposalTwo-year bar on demolition after FIR
JudgesJustice Atul Sreedharan & Justice Siddharth Nandan
Legal BasisArticle 226 of the Constitution
Index ReferencedTransparency International CPI 2025: India Rank 91/182

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Allahabad High Court
  • ›Case Type: Split Verdict on Demolition
  • ›Target this Data: Two-year bar on demolition after FIR proposed by Justice Atul Sreedharan
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Allahabad High Court (split bench)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 226 of the Constitution (High Court's writ jurisdiction)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which article of the Constitution empowers High Courts to issue writs for enforcement of fundamental rights and for any other purpose?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. The Allahabad High Court delivered a unanimous verdict on the petition against demolition of a home after an FIR.

2. Justice Atul Sreedharan proposed a two-year hiatus on demolitions after an FIR.

3. Both judges agreed that arbitrary demolitions violate the rule of law and the doctrine of separation of powers.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the Allahabad High Court's observation, what was India's rank in Transparency International's 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary legal principle on which both judges in the Allahabad High Court agreed regarding demolitions?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Upholds Mandatory Govt Service Bond for Subsidised PG Medical Education

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that doctors who pursue subsidised PG medical education cannot evade the mandatory two-year government service bond, even if there is administrative delay in providing posting. The court held that the bond ensures availability of doctors in government hospitals and protects patients' right to life under Article 21.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC: Public Employment is Public Trust; Unlawful Appointments Under Articles 14 & 16 Cannot Be Protected

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that public employment is a public trust, and appointments secured through deceit, misrepresentation, or abuse of judicial process cannot be protected. The court upheld the termination of a teacher whose appointment was found unlawful, and ordered recovery of salary and benefits received under interim court protection, reinforcing the constitutional mandate of equality under Articles 14 and 16.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Quashes NSA Detention of 25-Year-Old DU Graduate in Noida Workers' Protest

The Allahabad High Court quashed the NSA detention of a 25-year-old Delhi University graduate in connection with the Noida workers' protest. This ruling underscores judicial scrutiny of preventive detention laws and the necessity of sufficient grounds. For exam aspirants, it is a key example of judicial review under Article 226 and the limits of the National Security Act.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad High Court Quashes NSA Detention, Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Fine on UP Govt

The Allahabad High Court quashed the NSA detention of a 25-year-old student, calling it 'arbitrary and vague'. The court imposed a Rs 5 lakh fine on the state, recoverable from officials involved. This judgment reinforces judicial scrutiny of preventive detention laws like NSA.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Orders CBI Probe Into UP Police Encounter, Questions Police Narrative on Shooting

The Allahabad High Court has ordered a CBI probe into a police encounter in UP where a rape accused was shot in both legs, questioning the police's version of events. The court's strong observations about the pattern of police encounters and the rights of the accused make this a landmark judgment for police accountability and criminal justice reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

BCI Orders Physical Inspection of All Law Colleges within 6 Weeks, Bans Weekend/Shift Classes After AP HC Verdict

The Bar Council of India has issued a circular (Aug 4, 2026) mandating all universities to physically inspect affiliated law colleges within six weeks and ban weekend/evening/shift-based programmes. This follows an Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment emphasizing universities' continuing duty to ensure compliance with minimum legal education standards. For exam aspirants, this is a key regulatory update linking BCI powers, legal education rules, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Releases New Gender Sensitivity Handbook, Replaces 2023 Version; Recommends Survivor-Centric Language & Trauma-Informed Court Practices

The Supreme Court has released a new report titled 'Judgments and Gender' replacing its 2023 handbook on combating gender stereotypes. The report, drafted by an expert committee headed by former SC judge Justice Aniruddha Bose, provides practical guidelines for judges to use survivor-centric language, avoid morality-laden expressions, and adopt trauma-informed courtroom practices. This is crucial for UPSC as it reflects judicial reforms in gender sensitivity and victim protection.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Replaces 2023 Gender Stereotype Handbook with 2026 Report on Compassionate Court Practices for Trial Judges

The Supreme Court has released a new report replacing its 2023 gender stereotype handbook, shifting focus from language to courtroom trauma. It mandates trial judges to develop an 'Emotional Quotient', control aggressive cross-examinations, and prevent secondary traumatisation of sexual assault survivors, following the Allahabad HC's controversial 'preparation vs attempt' ruling.