PolityGovernance
News 8 of 22

SC Rules Safe Footpaths Are Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(d) & 21; 49.4% Indian Adults Physically Inactive (WHO 2024)

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
20 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:49.4%57.2%74%67%1.28 lakh150 min/week
Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaMinistry of Road Transport and HighwaysNational Crime Records BureauWorld Health Organization
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Supreme Court in Maniyar Iliyaz @ Shaik Riyaz vs P. Ayyappan (2026) held walking on footpaths a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21.

2.WHO India Physical Activity Profile 2024: 49.4% adults (57.2% women) and 74% adolescents do not meet recommended physical activity.

3.Pedestrians and two-wheeler riders account for ~67% of road fatalities (Ministry of Road Transport report 2024).

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court, in Maniyar Iliyaz @ Shaik Riyaz vs P. Ayyappan (2026), declared walking on demarcated footpaths a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21. This landmark judgment mandates states to frame policies for safe footpaths, addressing India's twin crises of rising non-communicable diseases (49.4% adults physically inactive) and road fatalities where pedestrians and two-wheeler riders account for 67% of deaths.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

SC JudgmentManiyar Iliyaz @ Shaik Riyaz vs P. Ayyappan (2026)
Fundamental RightArticle 19(1)(d) and Article 21
Adult Inactivity (WHO 2024)49.4% (overall), 57.2% (women)
Adolescent Inactivity74% (aged 11-17)
Road Fatalities (2024)1.28 lakh deaths; pedestrians & two-wheelers ~67%
WHO Recommended Activity150 min/week moderate-intensity

1-Minute Revision

  • ›SC Judgment: Maniyar Iliyaz @ Shaik Riyaz vs P. Ayyappan (2026)
  • ›Fundamental Right: Article 19(1)(d) and Article 21
  • ›Target this Data: 49.4% Indian adults physically inactive (WHO 2024)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (judgment in Maniyar Iliyaz @ Shaik Riyaz vs P. Ayyappan 2026)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 19(1)(d) and Article 21

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which Articles of the Constitution were cited by the Supreme Court to declare walking on footpaths a fundamental right?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. The Supreme Court in Maniyar Iliyaz @ Shaik Riyaz vs P. Ayyappan (2026) held that walking on footpaths is a fundamental right.

2. The WHO India Physical Activity Profile 2024 estimates that 49.4% of Indian adults meet the recommended physical activity levels.

3. According to the Ministry of Road Transport report, pedestrians and two-wheeler riders together accounted for nearly 67% of road fatalities in 2024.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the WHO India Physical Activity Profile 2024, what percentage of Indian adults do not meet the recommended levels of physical activity?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary significance of the Supreme Court's judgment on footpaths?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs Uniform Policy for Demolition & Rehabilitation of Unauthorised Homes Under Article 21

The Supreme Court has ruled that the state's power to demolish unauthorised constructions must be balanced with the duty to rehabilitate affected families, invoking Article 21 (right to dignity, shelter, livelihood). The court directed the Union and State governments to consider formulating a uniform demolition and rehabilitation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Centre Reply on PIL: Minors' Online Accounts Without Valid Contracts Under Section 11 Indian Contract Act

A PIL filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance has challenged the practice of allowing minors to independently sign up for digital platforms without verified parental consent. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre, highlighting the legal gap between Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act (barring minors from contracts) and existing IT/DPDP rules.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

CBSE Mandates Three Languages Including Two Native Indian Languages for Class 9 from July 2026

The Centre informed the Supreme Court it is working on implementing the CBSE's three-language policy, making two native Indian languages compulsory for Class 9 from July 2026. The policy aligns with NEP 2020, but faces challenges over implementation timelines and infrastructure, with the SC seeking a balanced solution.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Seals 20 Madrasas Under New Minority Education Act; USAME Replaces Madrasa Board

Uttarakhand has sealed 20 unrecognised madrasas under a new regulatory framework that replaced its statutory Madrasa Board with the Uttarakhand State Authority for Minority Education (USAME). The move, backed by a 2024 Supreme Court ruling upholding state regulation of minority institutions while protecting Article 30 rights, signals a shift toward standardised education in minority-run schools. Aspirants must connect this to Article 21A, RTE Act, and the ongoing debate between minority autonomy and state regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Health Ministry Backs Same-Sex Partners' Medical Decision Rights Under Mental Healthcare Act, 2017

The Union Health Ministry has told the Delhi High Court that excluding same-sex partners from making medical decisions for each other solely based on sexual orientation is unethical. This marks a significant administrative shift, though the government maintains that 'spouse' under Indian marriage laws only applies to heterosexual couples, creating a nuanced legal landscape for exam aspirants.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.