Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Court: Patna High Court (Single Bench of Justice Alok Kumar)
- ›Judgment Date: August 20, 2026
- ›Target this Data: August 20, 2026 (date of Patna HC judgment)
- ›Target this Court: Patna High Court, Single Bench of Justice Alok Kumar
- ›Target this Legal Point: Article 25 right to religion is subject to public order, morality, and health
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.