PolityGovernance
News 6 of 29

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
24 Aug 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:June 19, 2026August 24, 2026Article 19(1)(d)Article 21MoHUAMoRTH
Bodies:Supreme CourtMinistry of Housing and Urban AffairsMinistry of Road Transport and HighwaysMinistry of Rural DevelopmentNational Highways Authority of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.SC seeks response from states/UTs on ensuring encroachment-free, demarcated footpaths as directed earlier.

2.Right to walk on footpaths is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(d) and Article 21, with priority over motorized vehicles.

3.Duty bearers include urban development authorities, municipal corporations, municipalities, and panchayats; violation attracts constitutional remedies.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Landmark Verdict DateJune 19, 2026
Current Hearing DateAugust 24, 2026
Constitutional ArticlesArticle 19(1)(d), 19(1)(a), 19(1)(b), 19(1)(c), Article 21
SC BenchJustices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe
Case TitleRe: Fundamental Right to Walk and Footpath

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Landmark Verdict Date: June 19, 2026
  • ›Current Hearing Date: August 24, 2026
  • ›Target this Data: June 19, 2026 (date of landmark verdict declaring right to walk as fundamental right)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) and Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) jointly responsible for advisories
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 19(1)(d) and Article 21 of the Constitution

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which ministries were directed by the Supreme Court to ensure properly demarcated footpaths for pedestrians?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's recent judgment on footpaths:

1. The right to walk on a demarcated footpath is a fundamental right only under Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution.

2. The right to walk on footpaths shall have priority over movement by motorized vehicles.

3. The duty to ensure footpaths lies solely with municipal corporations.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did the Supreme Court declare that the right to walk on a demarcated footpath is a fundamental right?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary objective of the Supreme Court's direction regarding footpaths?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

AP Pedestrian Safety Policy 2026: SC Recognises Right to Walk, 36,526 Pedestrian Deaths in 2024, Section 198A Fine

The Supreme Court recognized the right to walk on footpaths as a fundamental right. Andhra Pradesh became the first state to notify a pedestrian safety policy, mandating audits, removal of encroachments, and a Rs 1 lakh fine under Section 198A MV Act for infrastructure failure causing death. With 1 in 5 road deaths being pedestrians (36,526 in 2024), this policy is a landmark for urban governance and social justice.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes All NEET Protest FIRs Under CJI Surya Kant; Raises Selective Justice Issue on Right to Peaceful Protest

The Supreme Court quashed all FIRs against NEET student protesters, affirming the constitutional right to peaceful protest. However, the editorial raises concerns about selective justice, noting that cases against factory workers, CAA protesters, and farmers remain pending, potentially criminalizing dissent based on the protester's identity.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

Footpaths integral to human life:…, Current Affairs for Exams