PolitySocial Justice
News 7 of 19

Centre Opposes Creamy Layer for SC/STs; SC Davinder Singh Judgement Allows Sub-Categorisation

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
08 Aug 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:Davinder Singh judgment (August 2024)7-judge BenchIndra Sawhney case (1992)
Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaUnion Government
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Centre opposes creamy layer for SC/STs in ongoing Supreme Court petitions, arguing the concept is inapplicable to these categories.

2.The 2024 Davinder Singh judgment (7-judge bench) recognised heterogeneity among SC/STs and allowed states to sub-categorise for reservation benefits.

3.The Indra Sawhney case (1992) established creamy layer for OBCs, but its application to SC/STs remains contested.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Union government has opposed extending the creamy layer concept to SC/STs in the Supreme Court, arguing it is not applicable to these categories. This comes after the 2024 Davinder Singh judgment allowed sub-categorisation within SC/STs, potentially reshaping reservation policies. Students must understand the distinction between OBC creamy layer and SC/ST sub-categorisation for polity and social justice segments.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Landmark CaseIndra Sawhney (1992) - Creamy layer for OBCs
Recent SC JudgmentDavinder Singh (August 2024) - Sub-categorisation for SC/STs
Bench7-judge Bench led by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Landmark Case: Indra Sawhney (1992) - Creamy layer for OBCs
  • ›Recent SC Judgment: Davinder Singh (August 2024) - Sub-categorisation for SC/STs
  • ›Target this Data: Davinder Singh judgment (August 2024) - 7-judge Bench
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (7-judge Bench led by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Creamy layer concept (Indra Sawhney) vs Sub-categorisation (Davinder Singh)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which Supreme Court judgment introduced the creamy layer concept for Other Backward Classes (OBCs)?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. The Union government opposes the application of the creamy layer concept to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).

2. The Davinder Singh judgment (2024) allowed sub-categorisation within SCs and STs.

3. The creamy layer concept is currently applicable to SCs and STs as per existing law.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

How many judges constituted the Supreme Court bench that delivered the Davinder Singh judgment on sub-categorisation of SC/STs?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary difference between the 'creamy layer' concept and 'sub-categorisation' as discussed in the article?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Centre Seeks SC Exemption for CSE 2025, 2026 from OBC Creamy Layer Income Test Retroactivity

The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to keep CSE 2025 and 2026 out of the Rohith Nathan judgment's retrospective operation, allowing the older OBC creamy layer income test to continue. It warns that retrospective application would hit 3.7 lakh OBC recruitments since 2016 and trigger widespread litigation across Railways, Banks, Posts and paramilitary.

Polity Current Affairs

Bihar GAD Reasserts Parents' Salaries, Agricultural Income Exempt in OBC Creamy Layer Test

Bihar's GAD order of September 1, 2026 reiterates that parents' salaries and agricultural income cannot be included in the income test for determining OBC creamy layer status. This follows the Supreme Court's March 11 Rohith Nathan judgment, which flagged 'hostile discrimination' in how the income test was applied differently. The Centre has separately sought SC clarity, even arguing that salary income may be the 'sole intelligible differentia' between OBC candidates in some cases.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Exempting Current Class 6 from Three-Language Policy; Centre Seeks More Time

The Supreme Court has proposed exempting the current Class 6 batch from the mandatory three-language policy, suggesting implementation from January 1, 2027. The Centre has sought more time to decide, while the court has asked for details on teacher availability and infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

SC OBC Creamy-Layer Verdict: Centre Seeks 2 Years for Prospective Implementation

The Supreme Court, in its March 2026 verdict, changed OBC creamy-layer criteria beyond just parental income. Now the Centre seeks 2 years to implement this prospectively, arguing retrospective application would cause administrative chaos in recruitments and admissions. This directly impacts reservation policy and civil services exams since 2012.

Polity Current Affairs

SC's March 11 Creamy Layer Judgment: Centre Seeks Clarification for 100 OBC CSE-2025 Candidates

Centre has approached SC seeking clarification on its March 11 judgment that ruled income cannot be the sole criterion for creamy layer among OBCs. The plea concerns 100 candidates selected in CSE since 2016 but rejected due to creamy layer criteria. The government warns retrospective application could disrupt CSE-2025 training and allocation.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Reduces NEET-SS Qualifying Percentile to 30% for Special Stray Vacancy Round; 40 Seats Returned to TN

The Centre agreed in the Supreme Court to lower the NEET-SS qualifying percentile from 50% to 30% for a special stray vacancy round, aiming to fill 1,857 vacant super-speciality seats. Additionally, 40 vacant in-service seats originally diverted to the All-India Quota will be returned to Tamil Nadu for its own counselling, a significant win for the state's in-service reservation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Centre Reply on PIL: Minors' Online Accounts Without Valid Contracts Under Section 11 Indian Contract Act

A PIL filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance has challenged the practice of allowing minors to independently sign up for digital platforms without verified parental consent. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre, highlighting the legal gap between Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act (barring minors from contracts) and existing IT/DPDP rules.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Rules on OBC Creamy Layer Income Test: Salaries Excluded, Centre Seeks Clarification on Retrospective Impact

The Supreme Court in March 2026 ruled that while determining OBC creamy layer status, income from salaries and agriculture must be excluded from the income/wealth test. The Centre now seeks clarification, arguing retrospective implementation from 2012 is 'extremely difficult' and would cause a cascading effect on recruitments and admissions.

What does the Centre’s opposition…, Current Affairs for Exams