The Chhattisgarh High Court has upheld the conviction of a man for stalking and sexually harassing a minor girl, reaffirming that persistent unsolicited expressions like 'I love you' constitute offences under Section 354(D) IPC and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. This ruling clarifies the judicial stance on harassment of minors while demonstrating judicial leniency in sentencing based on mitigating circumstances like prolonged trial duration and clean antecedents.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Convicted Under Sections: IPC Section 354(D) & POCSO Act Section 12
- ›Age of Victim: 16 years old (Minor)
- ›Target this Legal Point: Section 354(D) of IPC defines 'Stalking'.
- ›Target this Legal Point: Section 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012, deals with 'Sexual Harassment' of a child.
- ›Target this Judicial Principle: A victim's testimony in POCSO cases, if reliable, does not require independent corroboration.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.