PolityGovernance
News 16 of 26

SC CJI Recuses from Hearing Petitions Challenging CEC Act 2023 Citing Conflict of Interest

PolitySUPPORT
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
20 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:2023Section 7(1)Article 141
Bodies:Supreme CourtElection Commission of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Chief Justice of India Surya Kant recused himself from hearing petitions against the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023.

2.The Act replaced the CJI with a Union Minister in the selection panel for CEC/ECs, altering the composition mandated by the Supreme Court's March 2023 Anoop Baranwal judgment.

3.The core legal question is whether Parliament can circumvent a binding Constitution Bench judgment under Article 141 without providing explicit reasons.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant recused himself from hearing petitions challenging the 2023 CEC appointment law, citing conflict of interest. The law replaced the CJI with a Union Minister in the selection panel, diluting a 2023 Constitution Bench judgment. The case now tests Parliament's power to overturn a binding Supreme Court ruling.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Case Listed DateApril 7, 2026
Challenged ActCEC and other ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023
Key SectionSection 7(1)
Landmark Case CitedAnoop Baranwal vs Union of India (March 2023)
Constitutional ArticleArticle 141

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Case Listed Date: April 7, 2026
  • ›Challenged Act: CEC and other ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023
  • ›Target this Data: The CEC Act was passed in 2023 and its Section 7(1) is challenged.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench) and Election Commission of India.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 141 of the Constitution and the Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India (2023) judgment.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

As per the news, which constitutional body's appointment process is at the center of the legal challenge?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the news:

1. The Chief Justice of India recused himself from the case citing conflict of interest.

2. The challenged 2023 Act mandates the selection committee for CEC to include the Chief Justice of India.

3. The petitioners argue that the Act dilutes the Supreme Court's judgment in the Anoop Baranwal case.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

As per the news, which Article of the Constitution is central to the legal question of whether Parliament can circumvent a Supreme Court judgment?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional principle being tested by the petitions challenging the CEC Act, 2023, as discussed in the news?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

ECI SIR Process: 93% Inclusion Rate in WB Appeals; SC Hearing on Voter Deletions in Delhi & WB

The ECI's SIR process has led to massive disenfranchisement in West Bengal and Delhi. With only 3.2% of appeals disposed and 93% of those restored, the process is deeply flawed. The Supreme Court is hearing petitions; this has major implications for electoral integrity and universal adult franchise.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Clarity on 'Majority Within Political Party' Amid Shiv Sena Split; Hearing Continues

The Supreme Court is hearing the Shiv Sena faction dispute and has raised the need for a clear definition of 'majority within a political party.' This case has major implications for anti-defection law and the balance between political party control and legislative majority, a key topic for polity and governance exams.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Issues Notice on BCI's Conflict of Interest in Regulating and Owning Law Universities

The Supreme Court has questioned the Bar Council of India's authority to regulate legal education, noting that the BCI is a regulator of the legal profession, not an expert in legal education. The Court issued notice on a petition alleging conflict of interest as BCI owns law universities through its trust.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Split Verdict on CEC/EC Appointment Act, 2023; Matter Referred to CJI for Constitution Bench

A two-judge Supreme Court bench has split on whether to refer the challenge to the CEC and ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 to a five-judge Constitution Bench. With Justice Dipankar Datta disagreeing with Justice S C Sharma, the case now goes to the CJI for constituting a larger bench. For aspirants, this is a direct link to Article 324, the Anoop Baranwal verdict, and the independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Declares Citizenship Determination is MHA, Not ECI's Role: Justice Dhulia

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia reaffirms that citizenship determination is the mandate of the Ministry of Home Affairs, not the Election Commission. His remarks also highlight serious concerns over internal dissent within the ECI and potential contempt of court over electoral roll discrepancies in Goa.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Uses Article 142 to Quash NEET FIRs; PM at SCO Demands Action on Terror Financing

Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to quash all NEET protest FIRs, showcasing its plenary powers. PM Modi at the SCO summit called for united action against state-sponsored terrorism, indirectly targeting Pakistan. Other key updates include bank unions striking over PLI and 5-day week, totaliser debate, and India's tunnel rescue in Nepal.

CJI to shift challenge to 2023 CEC…, Current Affairs for Exams