PolityJudiciary
News 0 of 25

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
23 Sept 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:2023 law on CEC/EC appointment70-page split verdictJustice Dipankar DattaArticle 324
Bodies:Supreme CourtGovernment of India (Centre)Election Commission of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Justice Dipankar Datta rejects Centre's oral submissions comparing collegium criticism to appointment of Election Commissioners.

2.Split verdict: Justice Datta calls remarks 'disquieting'; Justice S.C. Sharma disagrees, saying submission was not criticism but a parallel.

3.SC defends collegium system, notes executive's intrinsic role and final say in judicial appointments under Article 324.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Case TypeSplit Verdict (70-page opinion by Justice Datta)
Subject MatterRejection of plea against 2023 law on CEC/EC appointment
Key JudgeJustice Dipankar Datta
Centre's Argument (SG Tushar Mehta)Collegium's 'judges appoint judges' criticized, so executive should have similar independence
Article ReferenceArticle 324 (rules for EC appointment)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Case Type: Split Verdict (70-page opinion by Justice Datta)
  • ›Subject Matter: Rejection of plea against 2023 law on CEC/EC appointment
  • ›Target this Data: 2023 law on appointment of CEC and ECs; 70-page split verdict by Justice Dipankar Datta.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court Collegium (appointment of judges); Election Commission of India (Article 324).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Doctrine of separation of powers; Article 324(2) – appointment of Election Commissioners.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional system of judicial appointments was defended by Justice Dipankar Datta in the split verdict?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the split verdict on the collegium system:

1. Justice Dipankar Datta termed the Centre's oral submissions as 'disquieting'.

2. Justice S.C. Sharma agreed that the Centre's submission was a criticism of the collegium.

3. The case involved a challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of Chief Election Commissioner.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

Who authored the 70-page opinion in the split verdict defending the collegium system?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary objective of the Centre's argument in the Supreme Court regarding the collegium system?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Split Verdict on CEC/EC Appointment Act, 2023; Matter Referred to CJI for Constitution Bench

A two-judge Supreme Court bench has split on whether to refer the challenge to the CEC and ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 to a five-judge Constitution Bench. With Justice Dipankar Datta disagreeing with Justice S C Sharma, the case now goes to the CJI for constituting a larger bench. For aspirants, this is a direct link to Article 324, the Anoop Baranwal verdict, and the independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to 2023 EC Appointment Law to 5-Judge Constitution Bench

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of Election Commissioners to a 5-judge Constitution Bench after a split verdict. The law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the selection committee, raising concerns about executive dominance and independence of the Election Commission. This case is crucial for exam aspirants as it involves constitutional principles of independence of constitutional bodies and separation of powers.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Clarity on 'Majority Within Political Party' Amid Shiv Sena Split; Hearing Continues

The Supreme Court is hearing the Shiv Sena faction dispute and has raised the need for a clear definition of 'majority within a political party.' This case has major implications for anti-defection law and the balance between political party control and legislative majority, a key topic for polity and governance exams.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Declares Citizenship Determination is MHA, Not ECI's Role: Justice Dhulia

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia reaffirms that citizenship determination is the mandate of the Ministry of Home Affairs, not the Election Commission. His remarks also highlight serious concerns over internal dissent within the ECI and potential contempt of court over electoral roll discrepancies in Goa.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Dismisses 2017 PIL to Abolish Hanging Execution; Centre May Review Alternatives

The Supreme Court dismissed a 2017 PIL seeking to replace hanging with less painful methods like lethal injection, but allowed the Centre to form an expert body to review execution methods. The judgment references the Law Commission's 187th Report and emphasizes preserving dignity while minimizing pain.

Polity Current Affairs

Anoop Baranwal Principle vs Prescription: SC Split on Referral of CEC Appointment Act Challenge

The Supreme Court's two-judge bench split on whether to refer the challenge to the 2023 CEC Appointment Act to a Constitution Bench. Justice Datta held that the Anoop Baranwal principle (appointments free from exclusive executive control) is binding, while the specific committee composition (including CJI) was advisory; thus the challenge raises only application, not interpretation. Justice Sharma disagreed, citing need for independent examination. This debate is crucial for understanding the constitutional independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Response on CAPF Act 2026 Challenged for Violating Articles 14, 16, 21

The Supreme Court has questioned the constitutional validity of the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Act, 2026, which mandates IPS officer deputation to senior CAPF posts, potentially overriding a 2025 SC judgment. This case tests the separation of powers and the rights of CAPF cadre officers under Articles 14, 16, and 21.