In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Case Type: Split Verdict (70-page opinion by Justice Datta)
- ›Subject Matter: Rejection of plea against 2023 law on CEC/EC appointment
- ›Target this Data: 2023 law on appointment of CEC and ECs; 70-page split verdict by Justice Dipankar Datta.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court Collegium (appointment of judges); Election Commission of India (Article 324).
- ›Target this Legal Point: Doctrine of separation of powers; Article 324(2) – appointment of Election Commissioners.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.