PolityConstitution
News 0 of 21

Supreme Court Dismisses 2017 PIL to Abolish Hanging Execution; Centre May Review Alternatives

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
18 Aug 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:PIL 2017Law Commission 187th ReportSection 354(5) CrPC
Bodies:Supreme CourtLaw CommissionMinistry of Home Affairs
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Supreme Court dismissed PIL seeking abolition of hanging as execution method.

2.Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta said verdict does not preclude Centre from reviewing methods via expert body.

3.Centre had earlier argued hanging is 'quick, simple' and less painful than alternatives.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court dismissed a 2017 PIL seeking to replace hanging with less painful methods like lethal injection, but allowed the Centre to form an expert body to review execution methods. The judgment references the Law Commission's 187th Report and emphasizes preserving dignity while minimizing pain.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

PIL Filed In2017
BenchJustices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta
Law Commission Report187th Report advocated removal of hanging
Centre's PositionHanging is quick, simple, less painful

1-Minute Revision

  • ›PIL Filed In: 2017
  • ›Bench: Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta
  • ›Target this Data: PIL filed in 2017 by senior advocate Rishi Malhotra
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Law Commission (187th Report)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 354(5) CrPC

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which report of the Law Commission of India advocated the removal of hanging as the mode of execution?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court verdict on execution by hanging:

1. The PIL seeking abolition of hanging was filed in 2017.

2. The Supreme Court directed the Centre to replace hanging with lethal injection.

3. The bench consisted of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

In which year was the public interest litigation (PIL) seeking abolition of hanging filed?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary reason the Supreme Court gave for not directing the legislature to change the mode of execution?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Response on CAPF Act 2026 Challenged for Violating Articles 14, 16, 21

The Supreme Court has questioned the constitutional validity of the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Act, 2026, which mandates IPS officer deputation to senior CAPF posts, potentially overriding a 2025 SC judgment. This case tests the separation of powers and the rights of CAPF cadre officers under Articles 14, 16, and 21.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs RBI, States, CBI on Digital Arrest Scams: SOP, Kill Switch, ₹18 Cr Restored

The Supreme Court issued interim directions to combat digital arrest scams, including RBI SOP for banks, operationalization of grievance redressal and money restoration modules, and examination of a 'kill switch' for calls. The court noted a decline in reported fraud but stressed continued vigilance. This is crucial for understanding judicial activism in cybercrime and institutional coordination.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Polity Current Affairs

Centre to SC: Foreign National Deportation Requires Home Country Nationality Confirmation

The Centre has informed the Supreme Court that a foreign national whose nationality is unverified cannot be deported until their home country confirms nationality and agrees to accept them. This affidavit was filed in a plea challenging the indefinite detention of persons declared foreigners in Assam without prospects of deportation.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Dismisses Plea to Abolish Hanging; PM CARES Fund Donations Jump 592% to ₹480 Crore in 2024-25

Today's news highlights key developments for exam aspirants: the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of execution by hanging but left the door open for a government review; the PM CARES Fund disclosed a massive 592% jump in donations to ₹480 crore but spent only 0.1% of it; and the SC sought a government response on a standardized probe for paper leak cases. These stories cover constitutional law, transparency in public charities, and governance reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Health & Education Current Affairs

NEET-UG Reform: Two-Stage JEE Pattern Under Active Consideration, Govt Tells Supreme Court

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it is actively considering shifting NEET-UG to a two-stage format on the JEE (Mains & Advanced) pattern. The final decision will await recommendations from the Nandan Nilekani-led High-Powered Task Force on exam reforms. This is crucial for medical aspirants as it could change the entire exam structure and enhance security against paper leaks.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Supreme Court dismisses plea…, Current Affairs for Exams