PolityScience_Tech
News 9 of 23

Delhi HC Holds OpenAI’s Use of Copyrighted Content for AI Training as Fair Dealing Under Section 52, Copyright Act

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
28 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:July 24, 2026 – Judgment dateSection 52, Copyright Act, 1957135-page judgmentDPIIT Working Paper December 2025OpenAI vs ANI
Bodies:Delhi High CourtOpenAIANIDepartment for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT)
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Justice Amit Bansal of Delhi HC ruled OpenAI’s use of copyrighted content for AI training is prima facie fair dealing under Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957.

2.The judgment applied the doctrine of 'updating construction' – law must evolve with technology without being frozen in past conditions.

3.This interim order challenges the DPIIT Working Paper's assumption that AI training infringes copyright, opening a policy debate between fair dealing and statutory licensing.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Delhi High Court, in an interim judgment on July 24, 2026, held that OpenAI’s use of copyrighted news articles from ANI to train ChatGPT is protected under the 'fair dealing' provision (Section 52) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957. The court invoked public interest, ruling that AI development benefits society and copyright law must adapt to technological progress. This judgment has major implications for India's AI policy, especially against the backdrop of the DPIIT's proposal for a mandatory blanket licence.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Judgment DateJuly 24, 2026
JudgeJustice Amit Bansal
CourtDelhi High Court (Single Judge)
Legal Provision InvolvedSection 52, Copyright Act, 1957 (Fair Dealing)
Key Doctrine AppliedUpdating Construction
PlaintiffANI (news agency)
DefendantOpenAI (ChatGPT)
DPIIT Working Paper DateDecember 2025
DPIIT ProposalMandatory blanket licence for AI training with remuneration

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Judgment Date: July 24, 2026
  • ›Judge: Justice Amit Bansal
  • ›Target this Data: July 24, 2026 – Delhi HC interim order on OpenAI vs ANI
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Delhi High Court (Single Judge: Justice Amit Bansal)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 52, Copyright Act, 1957 – Fair Dealing for research purpose

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which legal provision was primarily invoked by the Delhi High Court to hold that OpenAI's use of copyrighted content for AI training is protected?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Delhi High Court judgment:

1. The court held that AI training for research purposes qualifies as fair dealing under Indian copyright law.

2. The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court.

3. The court applied the doctrine of 'updating construction' to include AI bots as 'teachers' under the research clause.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

On what date did the Delhi High Court deliver the interim judgment holding OpenAI's use of copyrighted content as fair dealing?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary reason the Delhi High Court invoked 'public interest' in its judgment on AI training?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Refuses Stay on Copyright Ruling: LLM Training as 'Fair Use' Under Scrutiny

The Delhi High Court has refused to immediately stay a landmark ruling that allowed AI companies like OpenAI to train large language models on copyrighted content without licensing, citing 'fair use'. This case will define India's legal stance on AI training and intellectual property, with implications for tech regulation and content creators.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC: LLM Training on Copyrighted Works is Fair Dealing, Not Infringement

The Delhi High Court has ruled that training AI models (LLMs) on copyrighted works can fall under India's 'fair dealing' exception, providing legal cover for AI developers. The court rejected the US-style 'fair use' four-factor test and developed a unique fairness test focusing on market harm. This ruling is crucial for AI development in India and balances copyright holder rights with innovation.

Economy Current Affairs

Copyright Office Rejects AI Authorship, Rules AI-Generated Work Can Be Copyrighted as Original

India's Copyright Office has ruled that AI systems cannot be legally recognized as authors, but the works they generate autonomously can still be protected under copyright law. This decision in the DABUS case clarifies the legal position on AI-generated content, with implications for creative industries. The ruling distinguishes between the computational mechanism and the human author, aligning with India's existing copyright framework.

Science & Tech Current Affairs

ISRO Launches EOS-05: India's First Geo-Imaging Satellite in Geosynchronous Orbit; SC Invokes Article 142 to Quash CJP Protest Cases

A day of high exam relevance: ISRO successfully launched EOS-05, India’s first dedicated geo-imaging satellite in geosynchronous orbit, breaking a failure streak. The Supreme Court used its extraordinary power under Article 142 to close cases linked to CJP protests, raising important constitutional questions. Other key updates include OpenAI’s new autonomous AI model, Manipur’s NRC-first demand for Census deferral, mistrust in GDP data, and Tata Chemicals’ Kenya dispute.

Polity Current Affairs

Parliamentary Panel Demands Meta Apology Over PM Video Removal, Threatens Revocation of Safe Harbour Under IT Act Section 79

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and IT, chaired by Nishikant Dubey, has demanded Meta apologize for erroneously blocking PM Modi's video, or face revocation of safe harbour under Section 79 of the IT Act. Similar action is threatened against Google India for financial frauds. This highlights the government's push to enforce intermediary accountability and the conditional nature of safe harbour immunity.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Holds Doctor Must Verify Minor's Age, Report Termination Under POCSO

Delhi HC rules that a medical practitioner cannot rely solely on a patient's oral age claim for abortion; must verify age through documentary evidence and report minor's pregnancy under POCSO. This reinforces medico-legal responsibilities and is crucial for exam questions on MTP Act, POCSO Act, and judicial interpretation.

Polity Current Affairs

US Appeals Court Upholds $565.2M ICC Award Against Antrix Corp: FSIA Arbitration Exception Examined

The US Ninth Circuit upheld a $565.2 million ICC arbitration award against ISRO's commercial arm Antrix Corp, rejecting arguments of sovereign immunity under the FSIA. This landmark ruling clarifies the limits of state immunity in commercial arbitration and has significant implications for India's space sector and international investment disputes.

Science & Tech Current Affairs

Meta Smart Glasses at ₹25,000 Expose Privacy Law Gaps Under DPDPA 2023

Meta's AI-powered smart glasses, priced at ₹25,000, enable discreet recording, raising serious privacy concerns. The article highlights how India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 fails to regulate non-consensual recording in public spaces, despite the constitutional right to privacy under Article 21. Examines the need for updated laws to address surveillance tech.

Is training an AI model ‘public…, Current Affairs for Exams