PolityScience_Tech
News 5 of 21

Delhi HC: LLM Training on Copyrighted Works is Fair Dealing, Not Infringement

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
18 Aug 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:July 24, 2026ANI vs OpenAISection 52 Copyright ActFair DealingGoogle LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (2021)
Bodies:Delhi High CourtAsian News International (ANI)OpenAI
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Delhi HC interim ruling in ANI vs OpenAI: training LLMs on copyrighted works is permissible under fair dealing.

2.Court rejected blind adoption of US fair use test and laid down a unique three-factor fairness test.

3.Ruling clarifies that 'lawful access' is not a general requirement under fair dealing, good for AI innovation.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Delhi High Court has ruled that training AI models (LLMs) on copyrighted works can fall under India's 'fair dealing' exception, providing legal cover for AI developers. The court rejected the US-style 'fair use' four-factor test and developed a unique fairness test focusing on market harm. This ruling is crucial for AI development in India and balances copyright holder rights with innovation.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtDelhi High Court
CaseANI vs OpenAI
Interim Order DateJuly 24, 2026
Key Legal ProvisionSection 52 of Copyright Act, 1957 (Fair Dealing)
US PrecedentGoogle LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (2021) - fair use for copying code

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Delhi High Court
  • ›Case: ANI vs OpenAI
  • ›Target this Data: July 24, 2026 (Delhi HC interim order in ANI vs OpenAI)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Delhi High Court
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 52 of Copyright Act, 1957 (Fair Dealing)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which court gave the interim ruling in the ANI vs OpenAI case regarding copyright and AI training?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Delhi High Court's ruling on AI training and copyright:

1. The Delhi HC held that using copyrighted works for LLM training is permissible under the fair dealing exception.

2. The court adopted the US four-factor fair use test for the fairness analysis.

3. The court noted that 'lawful access' is not a general requirement under the fair dealing provision.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did the Delhi High Court pass the interim order in the ANI vs OpenAI case?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the impact of the Delhi High Court's ruling on AI developers like OpenAI and Sarvam?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Refuses Stay on Copyright Ruling: LLM Training as 'Fair Use' Under Scrutiny

The Delhi High Court has refused to immediately stay a landmark ruling that allowed AI companies like OpenAI to train large language models on copyrighted content without licensing, citing 'fair use'. This case will define India's legal stance on AI training and intellectual property, with implications for tech regulation and content creators.

Polity Current Affairs

Varsha Ashok Aglawe Appointed as 54th GSI Director General, First Woman in 176 Years

Varsha Ashok Aglawe, a palaeontologist with over three decades of experience, has become the first woman to head the Geological Survey of India (GSI) in its 176-year history. This landmark appointment signals a gender shift in India's premier geoscientific institution and comes with strategic priorities on critical mineral exploration and mineral security—key for national resource self-sufficiency.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Summons Meta Global Execs Over CSAM Handling, PM Modi Post Moderation Error

The Indian government has summoned Meta's global leadership, including Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan, to address concerns over Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) handling and wrongful moderation of verified accounts, following the brief blocking of PM Modi's Facebook post. This signals a major escalation in platform accountability, with implications for India's digital governance framework.

Polity Current Affairs

Parliamentary Panel Demands Meta Apology Over PM Video Removal, Threatens Revocation of Safe Harbour Under IT Act Section 79

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and IT, chaired by Nishikant Dubey, has demanded Meta apologize for erroneously blocking PM Modi's video, or face revocation of safe harbour under Section 79 of the IT Act. Similar action is threatened against Google India for financial frauds. This highlights the government's push to enforce intermediary accountability and the conditional nature of safe harbour immunity.

Polity Current Affairs

ISI Bill 2026 Introduced in Lok Sabha: Replaces Governing Council with 11-Member Board, Sparks Autonomy Debate

The Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) Bill, 2026, introduced in Lok Sabha, proposes to replace the 33-member Governing Council with an 11-member Board of Governors and change the institute's structure from a society to a body corporate. Faculty and opposition parties oppose the bill, citing loss of autonomy, while the government argues it is necessary for expansion and accountability. The bill would repeal the 1959 Act governing ISI.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Releases 2 Life Convicts Citing Chekhov; SRB Rejection 'Arbitrary' Under Article 21

The Delhi High Court ordered the release of two life-term convicts, holding that prolonged imprisonment 'kills slowly' and that Sentence Review Boards cannot reject early release pleas based on stereotyped reasoning. The judgment reinforces Article 21 rights and sets important guidelines for evaluating post-conviction conduct.

Polity Current Affairs

IT Rules 2025 Amendments: Joint Secretary Rank Mandated for Content Removal, Monthly Review by Secretary

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology informed Lok Sabha that amendments to IT rules (November 2025) enhance safeguards for content removal, requiring Joint Secretary-level officers to issue directions and monthly review by Secretary. This is crucial for understanding intermediary liability and digital governance.

Polity Current Affairs

Copyright Office Rules AI System DABUS Cannot Be Author, Work Still Eligible for Copyright

The Indian Copyright Office ruled that AI system DABUS cannot be legally recognised as an author under the Copyright Act, but the artwork it generated is original enough for copyright protection. The order clarifies that authorship requires a 'person' who 'causes' the work to be created, which under Indian law can only be a natural or juristic person. This is a landmark decision on AI and copyright in India.

Expert Explains | Why ‘lawful…, Current Affairs for Exams