The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that freedom of speech does not permit unfounded attacks on the judiciary. Crucially, it also held there is no absolute right to self-representation in criminal cases, allowing courts to mandate trained legal counsel to ensure fair proceedings, especially when a litigant's conduct risks undermining justice.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
- ›Judge: Justice Sanjay Vashisth
- ›Target this Data: 'No absolute or indefeasible right for a party to appear in person in criminal proceedings' - the exact legal principle.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Punjab and Haryana High Court (Justice Sanjay Vashisth).
- ›Target this Legal Point: Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 & Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.