PolityGovernance
News 22 of 23

SC Stays HC Order Declaring NSEI as 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act Section 2(h)

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
31 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:July 31, 2026July 1, 2026April 2010Section 2(h)
Bodies:Supreme CourtDelhi High CourtNational Stock Exchange of India (NSEI)Central Information Commission
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.SC stays Delhi HC division bench verdict of July 1, 2026, which upheld a single judge's 2010 decision declaring NSEI a 'public authority' under RTI Act.

2.The case hinges on whether NSEI is 'owned, controlled or substantially financed' by the government, making it liable to share information under RTI.

3.Examiner's angle: Tests understanding of 'public authority' definition under Section 2(h) of RTI Act, 2005, and the difference between regulatory control and public authority status.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court has stayed a Delhi High Court order that declared the National Stock Exchange of India (NSEI) a 'public authority' under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. This means citizens cannot currently enforce their right to information from NSEI. The case challenges whether a stock exchange, though controlled by the government, should be treated as a public authority.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Court & BenchSupreme Court (Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta)
HC Division Bench Verdict DateJuly 1, 2026
Key Legal ProvisionSection 2(h), RTI Act, 2005
Original Single Judge DecisionApril 2010 (Delhi HC)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court & Bench: Supreme Court (Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta)
  • ›HC Division Bench Verdict Date: July 1, 2026
  • ›Target this Data: July 31, 2026 — SC stay order date
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: National Stock Exchange of India (NSEI)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 2(h) of RTI Act, 2005 defines 'public authority'

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which provision of the Right to Information Act, 2005 defines the term 'public authority'?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's order on NSEI:

1. The Supreme Court has stayed the Delhi High Court order that declared NSEI a 'public authority' under the RTI Act.

2. The Delhi High Court's division bench had dismissed NSEI's appeal against a single judge's decision from 2010.

3. The Supreme Court has permanently quashed the Delhi High Court's order.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did the Delhi High Court's division bench deliver the verdict that NSEI is a 'public authority' under the RTI Act?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary legal consequence if NSEI is finally declared a 'public authority' under the RTI Act?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Uses Article 142 to Quash NEET FIRs; PM at SCO Demands Action on Terror Financing

Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to quash all NEET protest FIRs, showcasing its plenary powers. PM Modi at the SCO summit called for united action against state-sponsored terrorism, indirectly targeting Pakistan. Other key updates include bank unions striking over PLI and 5-day week, totaliser debate, and India's tunnel rescue in Nepal.

Polity Current Affairs

CIC Directs CBSE to Charge RTI Fees for Answer Scripts, Upholds Section 22 Override

CIC has ruled that CBSE must charge photocopying fees strictly as per RTI Rules, 2012, and recommended amending its May 2025 circular that barred revaluation for students who obtained answer sheets under RTI. The decision reinforces the overriding effect of Section 22 of the RTI Act over institutional rules.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Mandates SOPs to Curb Digital Arrests, Orders Time-Bound Refunds via I4C-RBI Portal

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre, States, RBI, and telecom authorities to implement standard operating procedures (SOPs) to combat 'digital arrest' scams. The order mandates time-bound grievance redressal, zero FIR registration, and money restoration mechanisms. The I4C report shows a 86% reduction in complaints from 2024 to June 2026.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs RBI, States, CBI on Digital Arrest Scams: SOP, Kill Switch, ₹18 Cr Restored

The Supreme Court issued interim directions to combat digital arrest scams, including RBI SOP for banks, operationalization of grievance redressal and money restoration modules, and examination of a 'kill switch' for calls. The court noted a decline in reported fraud but stressed continued vigilance. This is crucial for understanding judicial activism in cybercrime and institutional coordination.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds NCTE Notice: TEIs Must File Annual Appraisal Reports Under RTE Act

The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) to require all Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs) to file annual Performance Appraisal Reports. This judgment reinforces the regulatory power of NCTE, links the RTE Act's academic authority provisions, and expands the concept of 'duty-bearers' to include TEIs and NCTE itself. For exam aspirants, this is a key case in education governance, statutory interpretation, and fundamental rights.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC: No Sanction Needed Under BNSS Section 218 for Disproportionate Assets Cases

The Madras High Court has ruled that no prior sanction is required under Section 197 CrPC or Section 218 BNSS to prosecute public servants for disproportionate assets, because such an offence has no nexus with official duty. The ruling, which refused to discharge former DMK Minister M.R.K. Panneerselvam and his family, clarifies a key examiner-relevant dimension of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Rules BCI Cannot Discipline Law Students; Manipur Ethnic Violence Toll 306 Dead, 49 Missing Since 2023

A landmark Supreme Court ruling clarifies that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has no disciplinary authority over law students, limiting its powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 to registered advocates only. Meanwhile, Manipur's Home Minister disclosed in the Assembly that 306 people have been killed and 49 are missing in ethnic violence since May 2023. These two developments carry significant weight for UPSC Polity and Social Issues sections.