The article argues that the collegium system for judicial appointments lacks transparency, citing nepotism (30% SC judges with familial links) and the recent withdrawal of reasoned resolutions. It calls for reforms like publishing vacancies, criteria, and reasoned recommendations, while preserving confidentiality on integrity.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›SC Judges with Familial Links: 30% (10 of 33)
- ›Collegium Ceased Reasoned Resolutions: November 28, 2024
- ›Target this Data: 30% of SC judges (roughly 10 of 33) had familial links to former judges.
- ›Target this Legal Point: Second Judges Case (1993) shifted primacy to CJI and senior judges; Third Judges Case (1998) expanded to 5-member collegium.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court Collegium (5-member, headed by CJI).
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.