PolityScience & Technology
News 18 of 21

Delhi Police Affidavit in SC: Facial Recognition Identifies 2,873 Criminals at Jantar Mantar Protest

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
18 Aug 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:2,873 individuals47 history-sheeters92 involved in >10 cases2,402 from Crime Kundli471 from dossier records7 vehicle thefts
Bodies:Supreme CourtDelhi Police
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Delhi Police used facial recognition at Jantar Mantar protest, identified 2,873 persons with criminal records from Crime Kundli and dossier databases.

2.Police deny mass surveillance, stating the system only captures faces of those with serious criminal charges (murder, rape, POCSO, etc.) and does not profile peaceful protesters.

3.Supreme Court is hearing petitions; police claim protest was infiltrated by criminals citing 7 vehicle thefts, 67 other thefts, and 123 lost reports during July 20-26.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

Delhi Police has filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court defending its use of facial recognition technology during the Jantar Mantar protest, claiming it only identifies individuals with prior criminal records. The SC is hearing petitions alleging excessive force. This case is crucial for understanding the legal framework around surveillance technology and privacy rights in India.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Individuals identified with criminal records2,873
History-sheeters identified47
Persons involved in >10 cases92
Crime Kundli database count2,402
Dossier records count471
Vehicle thefts (July 20-26)7
Other thefts (July 20-26)67
Lost reports (July 20-26)123

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Individuals identified with criminal records: 2,873
  • ›History-sheeters identified: 47
  • ›Target this Data: 2,873 individuals identified with criminal records; 47 history-sheeters; 92 involved in >10 cases.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Delhi Police (filed affidavit in Supreme Court).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 32 (writ petitions for fundamental rights).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which court is hearing the petitions related to the use of facial recognition technology during the Jantar Mantar protest?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Delhi Police affidavit on facial recognition:

1. The facial recognition system was used to identify individuals with prior criminal records.

2. The system captured biometric data and Aadhaar details of all protesters.

3. The police identified 47 history-sheeters among those with criminal records.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the Delhi Police affidavit, how many individuals were identified through the Crime Kundli database?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary purpose of deploying the facial recognition system according to Delhi Police?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court to Examine Proportionality of Facial Recognition System in Delhi Protest

The Supreme Court will examine the proportionality of facial recognition technology used by Delhi Police during a student protest, raising critical questions about privacy, surveillance, and the balance between security and civil liberties. This has implications for the legal framework governing biometric surveillance in India.

Polity Current Affairs

Vitraya Tech Moves SC for CBI Probe into Health Data Breach by Competitors

A health insurance firm, Vitraya Technologies, has petitioned the Supreme Court alleging a coordinated cyber attack by competitors led to a massive data breach of sensitive customer information including Aadhaar and medical records. The company claims the Punjab Police registered an FIR after a six-month delay in a 'mechanical' manner, failing to investigate the named perpetrators. The Supreme Court has issued notices to the Centre, CBI, and Punjab government, making this a significant case on data privacy, corporate cybercrime, and investigative accountability.

Polity Current Affairs

UPSC Key: 14 Internal EC Dissents, Tarang Shakti-26 Multinational Exercise, and AI-Driven Semiconductor Supercycle

This Indian Express 'UPSC Key' compilation covers six critical topics: unprecedented internal dissent within the Election Commission (14 objections in 10 months), the second edition of India's largest multinational air exercise Tarang Shakti-26, the Supreme Court's reaffirmation of the Bijoe Emmanuel precedent on Vande Mataram, a new Centre scheme for lithium and nickel processing, the evolution of Yemen's Houthis from a local revivalist movement to a Red Sea power, and the global semiconductor 'supercycle' driven by AI demand. Each story is mapped to UPSC syllabus with previous year questions.

Polity Current Affairs

Karnataka HC Upholds 1.27 Acre Land Acquisition for DRDO's CAIR Project as National Security Imperative

Karnataka HC upheld acquisition of 1.27 acres for DRDO's CAIR project, overriding procedural lapses due to national security. This judgment harmonizes private property rights with constitutional duty to protect the nation.

Polity Current Affairs

NTA Gets CISF Security Cover After NEET Paper Leak; CBI Chargesheet Reveals Lapses

Following the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak that triggered nationwide protests and the resignation of the Union Education Minister, the NTA is shifting to a new office with CISF security cover. The CBI chargesheet highlights systemic lapses, including lack of frisking and CCTV monitoring, which allowed the leak. A high-powered task force under Nandan Nilekani has been set up to recommend exam reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Security & Defence Current Affairs

NIA Special Court Convicts 10 Maoists in 2013 Jheeram Valley Massacre: 27 Killed

A Special NIA Court in Chhattisgarh has convicted 10 Maoists for the 2013 Jheeram Valley massacre that killed 27 people, including top Congress leaders. This landmark conviction highlights the NIA's role in counter-insurgency and judicial accountability, making it critical for internal security and polity sections.

How facial recognition was used…, Current Affairs for Exams