PolityJudiciary
News 0 of 33

Gujarat HC Quashes Retrospective Use of 2023 Anti-Cheating Act Under Article 20(1) Protection

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
20 May 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:February 12, 2017Article 20(1)
Bodies:Gujarat High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Gujarat High Court quashed charges under the Gujarat Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2023, for a 2017 exam cheating case, calling retrospective application 'bad, illegal and violative'.

2.The court invoked Article 20(1) of the Constitution, protecting against ex post facto laws, and the Latin maxim 'lex prospicit non respicit' (law looks forward, not backward).

3.This judgment highlights a critical examiner angle: the interplay between new legislation, the principle of non-retrospectivity, and fundamental rights, a classic trap in polity questions.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Gujarat High Court has quashed charges under a 2023 anti-cheating law for an offense from 2017, declaring retrospective application as illegal and violative of fundamental rights. This ruling reinforces the constitutional protection against ex post facto laws under Article 20(1), a core principle in Indian polity. For aspirants, this is a direct test of your understanding of constitutional safeguards in criminal law and judicial interpretation.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Act QuashedGujarat Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2023
Constitutional ArticleArticle 20(1)
Key Legal Maximlex prospicit non respicit
Date of OffenseFebruary 12, 2017

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Act Quashed: Gujarat Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2023
  • ›Constitutional Article: Article 20(1)
  • ›Target this Data: The case involved the 'Gujarat Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2023'.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The Gujarat High Court (Justice Vimal Vyas).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 20(1) and the maxim 'lex prospicit non respicit'.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article provides protection against ex post facto laws, as invoked in the Gujarat HC judgment?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Gujarat High Court judgment:

1. It quashed charges under the Gujarat Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2023, for an offense dating back to 2012.

2. The court held that the Act contained an express provision giving it retrospective effect.

3. The judgment cited the Latin maxim 'lex prospicit non respicit', meaning law looks forward not backward.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

In which year was the examination conducted for which the accused allegedly arranged a dummy candidate, leading to the Gujarat HC case?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary legal ground on which the Gujarat High Court quashed the FIR under the 2023 Anti-Cheating Act?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Gujarat HC Quashes Demolition Order of Waqf Qabarstan, Upholds Statutory Right of Appeal

The Gujarat High Court quashed a demolition order against a century-old Muslim burial ground (Qabarstan) in Bhavnagar, ruling that the revenue authority violated the Waqf committee's statutory right to appeal under the Land Revenue Code by issuing a removal notice before the 90-day appeal window had even begun. This case is a critical reminder of procedural due process in property and religious rights matters.

Polity Current Affairs

Karnataka HC Quashes KPSC Chairperson Suspension; Governor's Independent Action Invalid Under Article 317(1)

Karnataka High Court reinstates KPSC Chairperson Sahukar, ruling that the Governor's suspension order was invalid because it was passed without the aid and advice of the State Cabinet. This reaffirms the constitutional principle that the Governor is bound by Cabinet advice, even in matters concerning removal of SPSC members under Article 317(1). Important for understanding Governor's discretionary powers and the role of the Supreme Court in such inquiries.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Releases 2 Life Convicts Citing Chekhov; SRB Rejection 'Arbitrary' Under Article 21

The Delhi High Court ordered the release of two life-term convicts, holding that prolonged imprisonment 'kills slowly' and that Sentence Review Boards cannot reject early release pleas based on stereotyped reasoning. The judgment reinforces Article 21 rights and sets important guidelines for evaluating post-conviction conduct.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

Governor Suspends KPSC Chairman Under Article 317(2) for Second Time Amid Recruitment Scam

Karnataka Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot has suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa S. Sahukar for the second time, this time with Cabinet approval, under Article 317(2) of the Constitution. The suspension follows a High Court order quashing the Governor's earlier unilateral suspension, and comes amid ED raids related to bribery in veterinary officer recruitments. This case highlights the constitutional balance between Governor's powers and Cabinet aid and advice.