PolityGovernance
News 2 of 24

Chief Election Commissioner Impeachment Motion Filed Under Judges Inquiry Act: Key Provisions of Article 324 (5) Explained

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
16 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Article 324 (5)Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968100 members (LS)50 members (RS)CEC and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023
Bodies:Election Commission of IndiaParliamentSupreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Impeachment notices against CEC Gyanesh Kumar submitted in Parliament, highlighting the removal procedure under Article 324(5).

2.Article 324(5) mandates CEC removal process is identical to that of a Supreme Court Judge, governed by the Judges (Inquiry) Act.

3.The CEC and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023, changes the appointment committee composition from PM-LoP-CJI to PM-LoP-Cabinet Minister.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The opposition has initiated impeachment proceedings against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, bringing Article 324 of the Constitution and the Judges (Inquiry) Act into sharp focus. This news tests your understanding of constitutional provisions for the removal of high constitutional functionaries, a core topic for UPSC Polity. Understanding the 'like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court' clause under Article 324(5) is crucial.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Article for CEC RemovalArticle 324 (5)
Process FollowedJudges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
Signatures Required (Lok Sabha)At least 100 members
Signatures Required (Rajya Sabha)At least 50 members
New Appointment Committee (2023 Act)PM, LoP, Union Cabinet Minister

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Article for CEC Removal: Article 324 (5)
  • ›Process Followed: Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
  • ›Target this Data: Minimum 100 Lok Sabha or 50 Rajya Sabha members' signatures required for a removal motion.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The three-member inquiry committee comprises a Supreme Court Judge, a High Court Chief Justice, and a distinguished jurist.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 324(5) states CEC removal is 'in like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme Court'.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Article of the Constitution is the procedure for removal of the Chief Election Commissioner specified?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner:

1. A motion for removal must be signed by at least 100 members of Lok Sabha or 50 members of Rajya Sabha.

2. The removal process is governed by the provisions of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.

3. The Constitution mandates that the CEC can be removed only on the recommendation of other Election Commissioners.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

As per the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, who are the members of the Selection Committee for appointing CEC and ECs?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional safeguard for the independence of the Chief Election Commissioner as highlighted in the news?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

EC Decision-Making Under Scrutiny: Article 324, CEC Act 2023, Dissent Notes Explained

The Election Commission's internal dissent has come under the spotlight after two Election Commissioners recorded objections 14 times in 10 months. This raises critical questions about the functioning of a constitutional body, the balance between unanimity and majority decision-making, and the protection of dissenting voices — a core area for UPSC and State PSC exams.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Split Verdict on CEC/EC Appointment Act, 2023; Matter Referred to CJI for Constitution Bench

A two-judge Supreme Court bench has split on whether to refer the challenge to the CEC and ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 to a five-judge Constitution Bench. With Justice Dipankar Datta disagreeing with Justice S C Sharma, the case now goes to the CJI for constituting a larger bench. For aspirants, this is a direct link to Article 324, the Anoop Baranwal verdict, and the independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to 2023 EC Appointment Law to 5-Judge Constitution Bench

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of Election Commissioners to a 5-judge Constitution Bench after a split verdict. The law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the selection committee, raising concerns about executive dominance and independence of the Election Commission. This case is crucial for exam aspirants as it involves constitutional principles of independence of constitutional bodies and separation of powers.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Refers 2023 CEC Appointment Law to CJI for Constitution Bench; Excludes CJI from Selection Panel

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of CEC and ECs to the CJI for consideration of a Constitution Bench. The law replaced the CJI with a Cabinet minister in the selection panel, raising concerns about executive influence. A split verdict between two judges led to the referral.

Polity Current Affairs

Anoop Baranwal Principle vs Prescription: SC Split on Referral of CEC Appointment Act Challenge

The Supreme Court's two-judge bench split on whether to refer the challenge to the 2023 CEC Appointment Act to a Constitution Bench. Justice Datta held that the Anoop Baranwal principle (appointments free from exclusive executive control) is binding, while the specific committee composition (including CJI) was advisory; thus the challenge raises only application, not interpretation. Justice Sharma disagreed, citing need for independent examination. This debate is crucial for understanding the constitutional independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

Judges (Inquiry) Act 1968 Invoked: Panel Finds Unexplained Cash at Justice Varma’s Residence, Report Tabled in Parliament

A three-member parliamentary inquiry committee under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 has found that former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma failed to explain the source of cash bundles discovered in his official residence after a fire. This is a rare invocation of the judicial removal mechanism, making it crucial for understanding the process of judicial accountability and the role of Parliament in the impeachment of judges.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Polity Current Affairs

AP High Court Declares Three-Capitals Petitions Infructuous; Amaravati Now Sole Capital Under AP Reorganisation (Amendment) Act 2026

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has deemed all petitions against the proposed three-capitals model as infructuous after Parliament amended the AP Reorganisation Act, 2014, making Amaravati the sole capital by law. This ends a long-standing political and legal battle, with implications for state governance and federal structure.

Knowledge Nugget | Impeachment…, Current Affairs for Exams