PolityGovernance
News 1 of 24

SC Permits Passive Euthanasia Under Article 21, Upholds 'Common Cause Guidelines' for Treatment Withdrawal

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
15 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:Article 2113 years (PVS duration)
Bodies:Supreme CourtLaw Commission of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.SC allows withdrawal of life support for Harish Rana (PVS patient for 13 years) under Article 21's right to life with dignity.

2.The ruling relies on the 'Common Cause guidelines' (2018/2023), establishing that CANH is 'medical treatment' and withdrawal must be in the 'best interest' of the patient.

3.Examiner's angle: Evolution of passive euthanasia in India from Gian Kaur (1996) to Aruna Shanbaug (2011) to Common Cause (2018) and now this application, highlighting judicial activism and legislative vacuum.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has conclusively allowed the withdrawal of life support for a patient in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS), cementing the 'Right to Die with Dignity' as part of Article 21. This ruling applies the 'Common Cause guidelines' (2018/2023) and clarifies that Clinically Assisted Nutrition and Hydration (CANH) qualifies as 'medical treatment' that can be withdrawn in a patient's 'best interest'.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Key ArticleArticle 21
Landmark Case (1996)Gian Kaur vs State of Punjab
Landmark Case (2011)Aruna R. Shanbaug vs Union of India
Watershed Case (2018)Common Cause vs Union of India
Patient ConditionPersistent Vegetative State (PVS)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Key Article: Article 21
  • ›Landmark Case (1996): Gian Kaur vs State of Punjab
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life with Dignity)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench)
  • ›Target this Case Law: Common Cause vs Union of India (2018)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Article of the Indian Constitution has the Supreme Court read the 'Right to Die with Dignity'?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the right to die with dignity in India:

1. In the Gian Kaur case (1996), the Supreme Court held that Article 21 includes the right to die.

2. The Aruna Shanbaug case (2011) led to the first recognition of passive euthanasia by the Supreme Court.

3. The Common Cause vs Union of India case (2018) was decided by a Constitution Bench and provided comprehensive guidelines for passive euthanasia.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

The Supreme Court's recent ruling allowing the withdrawal of life support was in the case of a patient who was in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS) for how many years?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

As per the Supreme Court's 'Common Cause guidelines', what are the two core principles that must be satisfied for the withdrawal of medical treatment?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Tamil Nadu Issues Advance Medical Directives Guidelines 2026 for Passive Euthanasia

Tamil Nadu has issued the Tamil Nadu Advance Medical Directive Guidelines, 2026 to operationalise passive euthanasia and strengthen patient autonomy at the end of life. The guidelines follow Supreme Court directions in Common Cause and Harish Rana vs Union of India, requiring States to establish medical boards and custodians for Advance Medical Directives. This is a landmark state-level health governance step with direct UPSC and State PSC relevance.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Issues Notice to Centre on Plea to Ban Polygamy Under Section 82 BNS Uniformly

The Supreme Court has sought the Centre's response on a petition challenging the constitutional validity of polygamy among Muslims, arguing it violates gender equality and is a primary driver of female destitution. The plea seeks uniform application of Section 82 BNS (bigamy law) and compulsory registration of Muslim marriages. This case could reignite the Uniform Civil Code debate and has implications for personal law reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

EC Decision-Making Under Scrutiny: Article 324, CEC Act 2023, Dissent Notes Explained

The Election Commission's internal dissent has come under the spotlight after two Election Commissioners recorded objections 14 times in 10 months. This raises critical questions about the functioning of a constitutional body, the balance between unanimity and majority decision-making, and the protection of dissenting voices — a core area for UPSC and State PSC exams.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.